Jump to content

The Fountain Pen Network uses (functional) cookies. Read the FPN Privacy Policy for more info.  To remove this message, please click here to accept the use of cookies


Registration on the Fountain Pen Network

Dearest Visitor of the little Fountain Pen Nut house on the digital prairie,

Due to the enormous influx of spammers, it is no longer possible to handle valditions in the traditional way. For registrations we therefore kindly and respectfully request you to send an email with your request to our especially created email address. This email address is register at fountainpennetwork dot com. Please include your desired user name, and after validation we will send you a return email containing the validation key, normally wiithin a week.

Thank you very much in advance!
The FPN Admin Team






Photo

  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Chrissy

Chrissy

    Ancient Artifact

  • Away
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,301 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 22:18

I decided to review this ink sample as it isn't long before the new POTUS will be inaugurated. So this is Diamine Presidential Blue

 
This is a medium range blue, an everyday sort of blue that you could use at home or in the office. I expected it to be darker than it writes. Although it doesn't look like it leans either red or purple like many Royal Blue types, it's chroma test reveals a little violet dye as well as the blue dye. So there is some violet in there.
 
It exhibits plenty of shading, with no noticeable sheen, and feels slightly drier than some other inks I've used recently. I experienced no problems while I was using it, no skips or hard starts, and it didn't dry out on the nib while I was doing swab tests. So for me it's a well-behaved ink
 
It felt slightly wetter when I changed from the F nib to the M nib, and then the B nib. It seems to get darker when the nib is broader. The dry time on all of the papers I used was 10-12 secs. Once dry there was no smearing.
 
It isn't sold as water resistant, but after I soaked the patch then blotted off the water, there was still enough ink left to show the original diagram.

 

  • This isn't sold as a waterproof ink, but shows some water resistance.
  • Bearing in mind the review form paper I use is thick with a shiny surface, and I used Lamy F, M and B nibs this ink took 10-12 secs to dry using the M nib. No smear after dry.
  • It exhibited quite good flow and I found it reasonably smooth to write with. I saw no skips or hard starts while I did swabs and dry time tests.
  • It is currently available in 80ml glass bottles or 30ml plastic bottles
  • Diamine sell it directly to end-users on their web-site.
  • It's a reasonable price.

fpn_1484172949__diamine_presidential_blu

fpn_1484172991__diamine_presidential_blu

fpn_1484173021__diamine_presidential_blu

 

Ink blot on paper towel

 

fpn_1484173061__diamine_presidential_blu



Sponsored Content

#2 inkstainedruth

inkstainedruth

    Ancient Artifact

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,030 posts
  • Flag:

Posted 12 January 2017 - 02:53

Thanks for the review.  

I liked the color of the sample of Presidential Blue okay when I tried it.  And the shading is pretty amazing.  But I found the ink to be dry dry dry....  And there are plenty of other Diamine blues I like better to skip getting a full bottle.

Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth


"It's very nice, but frankly, when I signed that list for a P-51, what I had in mind was a fountain pen."

#3 visvamitra

visvamitra

    Donor Pen

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,463 posts
  • Location:Poland
  • Flag:

Posted 12 January 2017 - 08:40

Rather generic but I guuess there must be some interest in such colors. 



#4 dcwaites

dcwaites

    DavidW

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,001 posts
  • Location:Campbelltown, NSW, Oz
  • Flag:

Posted 12 January 2017 - 09:38

I think this will be on my next batch of inks from Diamine.

A dry, beautiful blue, what's not to love?


fpn_1412827311__pg_d_104def64.gif

 

 

“Them as can do has to do for them as can’t.

And someone has to speak up for them as has no voices.”

Granny Aching


#5 Chrissy

Chrissy

    Ancient Artifact

  • Away
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,301 posts

Posted 12 January 2017 - 10:33

It's a nice blue, and if you need a dryer writing blue, that isn't overly saturated, and shades beautifully, then it fills that niche.  :)



#6 lapis

lapis

    medium rare

  • FPN Super Moderators

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,433 posts
  • Location:West Berlin
  • Flag:

Posted 12 January 2017 - 13:49

NIce review of a nice ink. But with or without a tick of violet -- and I see more a tick of green here-- there still seems to be something missing. As you wrote above, it doesn't smear. Majestic Blue does smear but both have about the same short drying time  (3-5 s on normal HP copy paper). I any case, one can't complain that Diamine doesn't offer a huge range of blues....

 

Mike


Life is too short to drink bad wine (Goethe)


#7 Chrissy

Chrissy

    Ancient Artifact

  • Away
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,301 posts

Posted 12 January 2017 - 14:02

NIce review of a nice ink. But with or without a tick of violet -- and I see more a tick of green here-- there still seems to be something missing. As you wrote above, it doesn't smear. Majestic Blue does smear but both have about the same short drying time  (3-5 s on normal HP copy paper). I any case, one can't complain that Diamine doesn't offer a huge range of blues....

 

Mike

 

There is definitely no green dye in this ink, just the regular blue dye that shows up in so many blue inks, plus a tick of violet. I will add a picture of the chroma test when I get a decent day to take a photo of it.  :mellow:

 

Neither Majestic Blue nor Sargasso Sea smear in my notebooks or on my Xerox paper when I've written with them in my pens. On the review in my notebook I used a glass dip pen when I wrote with both inks, and despite it laying down quite a bit of ink, it still didn't smear either of them in that notebook on 95gsm paper. Maybe my paper is a higher grade than normal HP printer/copy paper, but I probably have some cheap copy paper that I could try. Not that I ever use cheap printer/copy paper for writing on though.  :)



#8 lapis

lapis

    medium rare

  • FPN Super Moderators

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,433 posts
  • Location:West Berlin
  • Flag:

Posted 12 January 2017 - 20:09

Okay, you asked for it ! Ahh, c'mon, jus' kiddn' ! First off using a glass dip pen on Rhodia 80 g/m2. I chose to mention Magestic (M) here (in this thread) because it has more violet in it than P does. These scans show among other things that Presidential (P) is less concentrated and at the same time made up of a less soluble dye.

Secondly, however much violet there in fact is in P, P still has some green in it. That's all I was pointing at.

Last -- but least -- M may have more violet in it but that is also a different violet dye than in P, and that dye apparently overrides the appearance of green dye, even if it is less mobile.

 

Diamine%20P%20vs%20M.jpg


Life is too short to drink bad wine (Goethe)


#9 chromantic

chromantic

    Antique

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,302 posts
  • Location:so cal
  • Flag:

Posted 12 January 2017 - 20:39

Thanks, Chrissy. Not normally the type of blue that appeals to me but it comes across very nicely here, especially on the British notebook and the Rhodia (more so than the review form). I'll put this on my 'hmm' list.


It's hard work to tell which is Old Harry when everybody's got boots on.






Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: diamine presidential blue, diamine blue ink, presidential blue ink, medium blue ink, blue inks, diamine presidential blue ink, diamine mid blue inks



Sponsored Content




|