Jump to content

What Effect Does Gsm Have On Absorbency/saturation? And A Few General Paper Questions


BJT

Recommended Posts

What effect does the gsm of paper have on saturation/absorbency of ink, and what other factors affect it besides just gsm?

I was writing today with a fairly wet italic pen using diamine onyx black ink, and had cause to compare its writing on several different papers:

* clairefontaine 90 gsm notebook

* copier paper which I now know to be xerox 80gsm

* a bog standard envelope, probably 'tesco value', no idea what gsm?

 

The clairefontaine 90gsm is definitely the smoothest. However the line has a much better saturation and depth of colour, i.e. it's a much more 'jet' black - quite 'painty', and much more satisfying - on the 80 gsm copier paper. On the cheap envelope it has got the same satisfying painty quality albeit with a very slight amount of feathering, when you write slowly - although only if you look very closely and in my opinion not unattractively so.

 

I think with the 'higher' quality paper it is almost too shiny and it 'shimmers' and resists the ink resulting in less being laid down and reduced depth of colour. Anyone else notice this?

Does even higher gsm paper do this even more?

Is it possible to have the best of both worlds - a paper whcih slurps up ink out of the pen to give excellent saturation, but also very smooth and no feathering?

 

Also, the Clairefontaine notebook describes itself as "90gsm Clairefontaine brushed vellum paper" - is it actual vellum - i.e. does this mean I'm actually writing on a dead cow, as opposed to mushed up trees?

Edited by BJT

Paying by cheque in fish and chip shops since 1981

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • BJT

    3

  • Bobby Check

    1

  • zwack

    1

  • scrivelry

    1

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

I have always believed it was the coating on the paper and the finish on the paper that was most important in absorbency.

 

Also http://www.paperonweb.com/grade.htm may be of use.

 

Bobby

Why carry one pen when four will do!

 

Member of the Calgary Pen Club: <A href="http://www.calgarypenclub.com/" target=_blank>http: //www.calgarypenclub.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

interesting, thanks, yes it does make sense that coating affects it. I'll look into that.

Paying by cheque in fish and chip shops since 1981

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What effect does the gsm of paper have on saturation/absorbency of ink, and what other factors affect it besides just gsm?

I was writing today with a fairly wet italic pen using diamine onyx black ink, and had cause to compare its writing on several different papers:

* clairefontaine 90 gsm notebook

* copier paper which I now know to be xerox 80gsm

* a bog standard envelope, probably 'tesco value', no idea what gsm?

 

The clairefontaine 90gsm is definitely the smoothest. However the line has a much better saturation and depth of colour, i.e. it's a much more 'jet' black - quite 'painty', and much more satisfying - on the 80 gsm copier paper. On the cheap envelope it has got the same satisfying painty quality albeit with a very slight amount of feathering, when you write slowly - although only if you look very closely and in my opinion not unattractively so.

 

I think with the 'higher' quality paper it is almost too shiny and it 'shimmers' and resists the ink resulting in less being laid down and reduced depth of colour. Anyone else notice this?

Does even higher gsm paper do this even more?

Is it possible to have the best of both worlds - a paper whcih slurps up ink out of the pen to give excellent saturation, but also very smooth and no feathering?

 

Also, the Clairefontaine notebook describes itself as "90gsm Clairefontaine brushed vellum paper" - is it actual vellum - i.e. does this mean I'm actually writing on a dead cow, as opposed to mushed up trees?

 

If you were writing on dead cow (or dead any other animal) you would be paying a very high price per sheet, compared to paper. I don't have any Clairfontaine lying around, but from what I have seen and the word "paper" in their description I am personally sure what you've got there is mushed up fibers, though whether from trees, or cotton, or some other plant, or a combination, I couldn't tell you without looking at the notebook and possibly contacting Clairfontaine if it does not say.

 

I have never seen real vellum or parchment for sale anywhere I have ever been. Just searching the net I found once source that seems to cater to Wiccan users that had a 9 by 12 sheet for 39.95. That's for one sheet. Another place had two inch by two inch pieces for something like 9.95. I wouldn't worry about animal parchment being sold as paper - you'd have noticed the price difference and gasped before you bought.

Edited by scrivelry
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok. I thought as much - just confirming the description actually referred to it having the characteristics of vellum, rather than actually being vellum. Since I'm not writing out newly-enacted laws, I'm happy.

Paying by cheque in fish and chip shops since 1981

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The higher GSM papers weigh more for a set surface area, that means they are either thicker or more compressed.

 

If just thicker then they should absorb more, as there is more volume for the ink to vanish into. They might feather more but are less likely to show bleedthrough. A more compressed paper is less likely to absorb ink, so it will take longer to dry, might spread across the surface but could show some bleedthrough.

 

The paper might be coated which would affect absorbency too.

 

So, the same paper from the same manufacturer with a higher weight is more likely to be absorbent. But different manufacturers or even just different papers and all bets are off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26772
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...