Which Parker Is This?

[ceejaybee]

Since you accept that the general rule is that the fourth quarter is date coded with just the letter with no number/dot but you claim an exception for the 2000 - 2009 decades, it is very reasonable that you should provide an evidence for your claim rather than demanding the same for the generally accepted rule. Hope you would give that 'firm evidence' to establish the exception that you claim.

 

Regards.

 

I didn't accept the general rule whatever that is? I said the 4th quarter date codes used between 2000 -2009 also used a dot, I think I was quite specific

 

http://i865.photobucket.com/albums/ab212/ceejaybee_photo/IMG_8624.jpg

[Mike 59]

Also bear in mind the use of different Parker symbols in dfferent decades, e.g the sloping P and then the halo with the vertical arrow through the centre.

[mitto]

I didn't accept the general rule whatever that is? I said the 4th quarter date codes used between 2000 -2009 also used a dot, I think I was quite specific

 

http://i865.photobucket.com/albums/ab212/ceejaybee_photo/IMG_8624.jpg

That is quite convincing. A Sonnet refresh version introduced in 2008. But pens being produced in the year preceding the year of introduction (in this case 2007) is understandable.

 

Thank you, ceejaybee.

Edited April 25, 2016 by mitto