Jump to content

Identify Imperial/triumph Sheaffer


Buttonboy

Recommended Posts

I always think of the squared ends barrels as correct for the touchdown models .... Gotta be able to unscrew the blind cap. We do see the squared and rounded top caps mixed quite a bit in our NOS inventory.

 

Yes, about the "quasi-imperial" moniker -- guilty as charged. I just resist calling them "Triumph White Dot" ......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Happy Harry

    9

  • mitto

    6

  • Buttonboy

    6

  • terim

    4

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I always think of the squared ends barrels as correct for the touchdown models .... Gotta be able to unscrew the blind cap. We do see the squared and rounded top caps mixed quite a bit in our NOS inventory.

Yes, about the "quasi-imperial" moniker -- guilty as charged. I just resist calling them "Triumph White Dot" ......

So do you think, terim, that the round ended barrel on my CC Imperial VI is correct?

Khan M. Ilyas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not want to appear thick but I am not clear what gold "fiiled" means. Happy Harry mentioned this earlier in the tread. I have "fluted" and "striated" Sheaffers but I dont think I have come across this particular descripion.

 

Ian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not want to appear thick but I am not clear what gold "fiiled" means. Happy Harry mentioned this earlier in the tread. I have "fluted" and "striated" Sheaffers but I dont think I have come across this particular descripion.

 

Ian

See here for the definitions of 'Gold Filled', 'Rolled Gold' and 'Gold Plated' (along other things).

 

http://parkerpens.net/codekey.html

Khan M. Ilyas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Named triumphs by Sheaffer and quasi - Imperial by the collector community.

 

I think more a case of people not knowing the model name, I wouldn't bother making up a name when they already have a name. I think the collectors generally call these pens Triumphs.

The "quasi" is just a modifier to the Imperial description, not intended as an actual product name. For us it's short hand for Imperial-like. We try not to use the expression without mentioning its non-official status.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "quasi" is just a modifier to the Imperial description, not intended as an actual product name. For us it's short hand for Imperial-like. We try not to use the expression without mentioning its non-official status.

 

I find that confusing. Triumph is shorter than Quasi-Imperial. I looked at your web site and find : Sheaffer 440 ( Quasi-Imperial). Why not correctly describe it as a Sheaffer Triumph 440 as Sheaffer did ? I just don't see any value in spreading an incorrect name through the hobby, I even see sellers on ebay using quasi-imperial !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sheaffer made many, many pens that follow the original design started with the 1960 Target and continued with names including Imperial, Lifetime, Triumph, Triumph Imperial, and so on from 1960 until the late 1990s. Among these pens, Sheaffer fitted various nib units, including multiple conical and inlaid types, short and long clips, differently shaped caps and barrels, and multiple filling systems. To make matters worse, there are many examples I can think of that have incorrect cap/barrel swaps. Sheaffer catalogs across the nearly 40 years are not 100% available, so collectors struggle with what to call these pens, when they are trying to be accurate with model names and numbers.

 

In my opinion, I don't mind them all being called Imperials or Triumphs as a general name, as they do all appear to have a family resemblance. That said, there is likely someone who may have information on the particular pen's provenance, including model name and catalog number, and I am always happy to know it.

 

Let's all make sure we approach this as being helpful to each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The history section on sheaffertarga.com clearly documents the names ( taken from '74 UK retail price list) of these in the current discussion quiet well. I have little problem with common usage of calling them all Imperials but I'm not keen on adding to the confusion with made up names when the correct can be used instead. For the sake of "correctness" the correct name should be promoted where possible imo. From that site.

 

http://www.sheaffertarga.com/Imperial%20and%20Triumph/Scanned%20Images/triumph%20550.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26771
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...