Jump to content

Regarding Edward Johnston's Writing & Illuminating & Lettering


dragos.mocanu

Recommended Posts

Greetings,

 

I was looking to buy a copy of Edward Johnston's famous book, and stumbled across this piece of information: it would seem that copies printed prior to the 1940s have 499 pages, whereas those published after the 1940s only have 434 pages. Does anyone know which of the pages might be missing in the shorter version? Could the text be more condensed?

 

I am also aware that there are a couple of recent reprints, but from what I understand, these books are printed after photocopies of the original version. Has anyone compared the old with the new?

 

Cheers!

"The truth may be puzzling. It may take some work to grapple with. It may be counterintuitive. It may contradict deeply held prejudices. It may not be consonant with what we desperately want to be true. But our preferences do not determine what's true..." (Carl Sagan)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • dragos.mocanu

    4

  • inkstainedruth

    1

  • LeonW

    1

  • AnneLyle

    1

Hmm, that's interesting - I have the 1948 edition (belonged to my late mum) which has 434 pages. I skimmed the introduction and preface but couldn't find any mention of the revision changes.

 

I'll be interested to hear what the difference is!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The online version (which can be found here https://archive.org/details/writingilluminat00johnuoft ) is a photocopy after the 1917 print, and has 500+ pages (but the last pages are various advertisements)...Normally, no important information should be missing from the later versions (the ones with 434 pages), but I could be wrong...

 

AnneLyle, could you please compare the Contents table of your book with the one in the online version? Any major discrepancy should be observed right away.

"The truth may be puzzling. It may take some work to grapple with. It may be counterintuitive. It may contradict deeply held prejudices. It may not be consonant with what we desperately want to be true. But our preferences do not determine what's true..." (Carl Sagan)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hmm, that's interesting - I have the 1948 edition (belonged to my late mum) which has 434 pages. I skimmed the introduction and preface but couldn't find any mention of the revision changes.

 

I'll be interested to hear what the difference is!

 

I've eventually ended up buying both "versions" (1920 and 1965), but I'm still waiting for the newer one. When I'll have both, I'll compare them carefully.

"The truth may be puzzling. It may take some work to grapple with. It may be counterintuitive. It may contradict deeply held prejudices. It may not be consonant with what we desperately want to be true. But our preferences do not determine what's true..." (Carl Sagan)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now I'm going to have to try and dig up my reprint copy to see which edition it is. All I remember is that it was put out by the same company that also did a facsimile reprint of an old needlework book from roughly the same time period called Embroidery and Tapestry Weaving -- and I keep getting the books mixed up because the covers are so similar (they're both paperbacks, and the books are about the same size and cover color...).

Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth

 

edited for formatting

Edited by inkstainedruth

"It's very nice, but frankly, when I signed that list for a P-51, what I had in mind was a fountain pen."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have unraveled the mystery of the two versions (510pp and 439pp)...ironically, the later version actually has more content (a third appendix was added). The difference in the number of pages is due to the following:

 

1. The first chapter of the old version starts from page 35 (continuing the numbering from the preface and table of contents), whereas in the later version it starts with page 1; this is not so much a difference in the number of pages, but it is a difference in numbering

2. The collotypes in the old version were printed one per sheet, whereas in the later version they were printed one per page (sparing 24 pages)

3. In the old version there is a blank page and a title page between the 2 main sections, whereas in the later one there aren't any (sparing 2 pages)

4. In the old version there are advertisements at the end of the book, whereas in the later one there are none.

 

Cheers!

"The truth may be puzzling. It may take some work to grapple with. It may be counterintuitive. It may contradict deeply held prejudices. It may not be consonant with what we desperately want to be true. But our preferences do not determine what's true..." (Carl Sagan)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Okay, thanks for the additional information. Just dug out my copy and found that it's the 1978 edition.

 

Currently working on Michael Sull and Deborah (?) book on learning Spencerian writing. Will return to Mr. Johnston's volume directly... or somewhat soon.

“Don't put off till tomorrow what you can do today, because if you do it today and like it, you can do again tomorrow!”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33559
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26744
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...