Jump to content

Woodbin Thin-Wall Or Regular "silicone" Sacs For Sheaffer Converter?


mhosea

Recommended Posts

I want to re-sac several of the squeeze converters I use on various Sheaffer C/C pens. I'd like to use the "silicone" (presumably PVC) sacs from Woodbin for robustness and longevity, but I'm not sure whether to get the regular or thin-wall sacs for this purpose. I had a spare #16 thin-wall, and this works fine, but if the regular ones are the same stuff and just have thicker walls, then I would think that would be better. What do you think? Are they the same stuff? I don't want pure silicone for this (I even have some of those on-hand already if I did).

I know my id is "mhosea", but you can call me Mike. It's an old Unix thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • mhosea

    5

  • Ron Z

    3

  • adyf

    2

  • 3rdlakerobert

    1

Hey Mike,

 

I believe that they are the same stuff. If I am wrong I suspect that something big will land on my head.

Since you are using squeeze converters I don't think that it will matter which ones you use. Now if you were talking about some British mid range lever fillers that would be another story.

 

All the best

 

Philip

www.scriptusinc.com



Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Woodbin silicone sacs are PVC, both thin and regular walled. The thick ones are made only in even number sizes i.e. 14, 16, 18 etc, the thin walled are odd numbered half sizes i.e.14 1/2, 15 1/2, 17 1/2, which was used for the snorkel, TD and PFM respectively.

 

The thinner sacs were made on the belief that the thinner sac would compress more easily, and therefore the pen would fill more easily. They do compress more easily, but because the wall is thinner they don't have the strength to return to their original position, so can't draw in as much ink. The fact that snorkel sacs and Richard Binder and I got from the Sheaffer were decidedly not thin walled, but were regular sacs confirmed our belief. I still use the 15 1/2 and 17 1/2 sacs because they fit into the sac guard, where the 16 and 18 will not. But I use regular #14 synthetic sacs in snorkels.

 

I it is my considered and experienced opinion that a synthetic sac (and I use the ones from Woodbin) should be used in snorkels, and never latex sacs, whether you use 14 or 14 1/2. The latex sac will break down, and its failure can lead to expensive damage i.e rusting of the spring, rusting of the spring to the ring on the sac guard, rusting of the blind cap screw etc, which can be pretty much eliminated with the use of a synthetic sac. I've also seen early failure of latex sacs in the pens with sac guards regardless the source.

spacer.png
Visit Main Street Pens
A full service pen shop providing professional, thoughtful vintage pen repair...

Please use email, not a PM for repair and pen purchase inquiries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I it is my considered and experienced opinion that a synthetic sac (and I use the ones from Woodbin) should be used in snorkels, and never latex sacs, whether you use 14 or 14 1/2.

Yes, I'm a believer. I followed your advice and changed my snorkels and touchdowns to the synthetic ones from Woodbin.

 

I just ordered a batch of #16's for my black-plug Sheaffer squeeze converters. When I remove the latex sacs of these converters, they seem to have held up pretty well (most have seen scant use over the last 30-ish years, I guess), but I don't trust them, and I'm never quite sure of what kind of shape they're really in until I remove them.

Edited by mhosea

I know my id is "mhosea", but you can call me Mike. It's an old Unix thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey Mike,

 

I believe that they are the same stuff. If I am wrong I suspect that something big will land on my head.

Since you are using squeeze converters I don't think that it will matter which ones you use. Now if you were talking about some British mid range lever fillers that would be another story.

 

All the best

 

Philip

 

Got them in today. Sure looks like the same stuff to me. I do like the thicker ones (the non-thin ones, rather) a bit better for this application. Thanks again, Philip.

I know my id is "mhosea", but you can call me Mike. It's an old Unix thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike:

 

I use standard walled PVC/Silicone sacs in squeeze converters from Sheaffer or Parker. They are a little thicker hence I hope more durable when my clumsy fingers squeeze them.

 

Plus I like seeing the ink stain them. I have even checked how much ink I get in them a time or two.

 

More importantly Ron Z's reasons for using PVC/Silicone sacs in metal housings like Snorkels, Touchdowns, and Converters are pretty strong. He makes a compelling argument.

 

Jon the Eclectic Penner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I'm a believer. I followed your advice and changed my snorkels and touchdowns to the synthetic ones from Woodbin.I just ordered a batch of #16's for my black-plug Sheaffer squeeze converters. When I remove the latex sacs of these converters, they seem to have held up pretty well (most have seen scant use over the last 30-ish years, I guess), but I don't trust them, and I'm never quite sure of what kind of shape they're really in until I remove them.

I've got a Sheaffer converter that requires a new sac, never contemplated being able to resac it myself. So thanks for the tip, is the black plug in the end of the converter easy to remove?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got a Sheaffer converter that requires a new sac, never contemplated being able to resac it myself. So thanks for the tip, is the black plug in the end of the converter easy to remove?

Varies depending on how deeply it was staked. Use heat. I hook it through the opening and pull while heating. If you can get a little movement, it can be wiggled out with with fingernails under the edge. It's easy to damage the opening, so take care with whatever you're using to hook it. I suppose the best practice is to flatten the metal where it was previously staked before reassembling, then re-stake it. Sometimes I don't. Note that there is a slot for the squeeze bar. I like to slide the squeeze bar out about a half mm to make sure it's in the slot.

I know my id is "mhosea", but you can call me Mike. It's an old Unix thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose the best practice is to flatten the metal where it was previously staked before reassembling, then re-stake it.

 

It is. Flattening the wall of the converter makes it easier to put the plug back in the casing. Staking it again helps to ensure that the plug doesn't get left behind when you remove the converter. This could be a real issue if ink leaks around the seal on the piercing tube and dries, which makes taking the converter out entertaining enough. We don't need to add the thrill of getting the stuck plug off down in the section threads as well. :gaah:

 

I love that emoticon. I wish I had a poster size, or at least a picture size, image of it to hang on my shop wall.

spacer.png
Visit Main Street Pens
A full service pen shop providing professional, thoughtful vintage pen repair...

Please use email, not a PM for repair and pen purchase inquiries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Mike and Ron, I don't suppose I've anything to lose by giving it a try. That is, as long as the black plug holds firm in the converter after reassembly :) .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Not that I know of. His daughter was helping him. I hope that she will either pick up the business once ownership is settled, or maybe sell it to someone in Canada. He provided a niche service that an awful lot of people depended on, not just pen mechanics.

spacer.png
Visit Main Street Pens
A full service pen shop providing professional, thoughtful vintage pen repair...

Please use email, not a PM for repair and pen purchase inquiries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33577
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26766
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...