Jump to content

Jinhao 8812 Review


baik12

Recommended Posts

This is my first pen review so constructive criticism is welcomed :)

 

Basic Info:

Model: Jinhao 8812

Length: 13.9 cm capped (12.5 cm uncapped, 16.5 cm posted)

Weight: 39 grams (caps is 13 grams)

Nib: M, 18K GP

Filling system: comes with a Jinhao converter, fits international standard cartridge

 

http://s29.postimg.org/hgvtp0ruf/20151007_202627.png

http://s13.postimg.org/5rnaatlaf/20151007_202710.png

 

What really drew me to this pen is the aesthetics. I am a sucker for wood motifs. Not to mention that it is very economically priced (just $7.64 on Amazon).

 

 

 

http://s1.postimg.org/ctkqkd4bz/20151007_210603.png

 

The converter works okay. It sometimes has trouble sucking up the ink. If you can directly fill the converter with a syringe, that won't be a problem. It holds around 0.5 mL.

 

 

 

http://s29.postimg.org/8jfp5eos7/20151007_202716.png

 

My main problem with this pen is that the nib has a tendency to move around a bit. Nib itself is not the best quality. Nib could be easily pulled out of the pen (but good luck pushing it back into the pen).

 

 

 

http://s16.postimg.org/en73m640l/20151007_203024.png

http://s21.postimg.org/hxr6ss1yv/Untitled.png

 

The pen writes pretty smoothly. It feels very similar to other Jinhao pens that I own. The pen is very long when posted, and feels awkward in my small hand.

 

 

 

Aesthetics: 4/5

Flow: Medium

Nib quality: 2/5

Cleaning: Easy

Quality: 3

Overall: 3/5

 

 

 

Overall, the pen performs very well for a budget pen. But you cannot expect a "wow" factor from this pen.

Edited by baik12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • baik12

    2

  • garyc

    1

  • drjmb

    1

  • rramesh

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

I would use it with the cap unlisted. I like Chinese pens, but the metal ones are heavy and can feel unbalanced when posted, even for someone with very large paws (that's me).

Nice looking pen, and good job on the review.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

A nice pen and a nice short review..is the barrel really made of wood?

 

As far as I can tell, it is wood.

It does feel like wood...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Let me add my two cents on this pen.

I am not a big fun of Chinese pens. I do collect Parker Sonnet clones so I am familiar with the initial bad quality and the progress of chinese pen manufacturers. I bought a Duke Opera many years ago, just to populate the collection with a pen with a distinctive chinese theme. It was heavy (as many chinese pens are) wrote reasonably well but the magnetically closing cap lost its magnetism (perhaps when I left my jacket next to a heating element).

I have seen noticed an increasing chatter for chinese pens, perhaps indicating a new wave of newcomers into our hobby. Good, I said, it is a low cost entry and if they ever graduate to a quality pen, then are trapped :)

So I was not looking for purchasing more chinese pens. I do have a sizable vintage/modern collection and there was no reason to get more inferior quality pens. Or so I thought. I saw this pen when a friend recommended it on FB. The combination of wood barrel, black plastic cap and silver appointments was very pleasing (at least to me). It was about 8 bucks, so I bought one.

The visual effect was pleasing. The presence of the good makes this pen much better weight balance compared to the rest of the chinese heavies.
The quality is about right for a $8 pen. Small gaps between adjacent parts (wood, metal, plastic at the top of the barrel), rough edges (under the microscope) of metallic parts, machining chips at the base of the clip. Having said than none of them is visible to the naked eye. They do make me worry in terms of how it is going to behave in the long run due to the wood.

The converter is a problem... I could not fill it from my trusted Rotring bottle (see here). A little bit of googling showed that this has been consistently the problem with most if not all Jihnao pens. It is just not worth losing time from our life to fix such a converter. There are many reasonable quality ones around $5. If you like and want to use this pen - use cartridges or a proper converter.

As a writer the nib is reasonable. Some feedback (I would have liked it a little less) and the characteristic feeling of steel nibs. Solid, I have written few pages and did not find a problem. It wrote every time I tried.

Conclusion. Usable low quality pen. If the converter was not a problem it would be a reasonable entry point pen. The converter issue can be a problem for the new users.

Can someone tell now? It cannot be otherwise. Which pen is this modeled after?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I also bought this pen from eBay just before Christmas (£5.41 shipped which is about $7.89 at the current exchange rate) and it arrived the day before yesterday.

 

I have to say I very much like this pen. I don't have any of the problems mentioned here: the nib is very smooth, perhaps a little dry writing, but it puts down quite a finer line compared to the majority of Chinese medium nibs I have used (Jinhao X750, Hero, Baoer etc.). I had no trouble with the converter and getting a fairly full 'fill'. Diamine Ancient Copper goes very well with the colour of the barrel. The cap also fits snugly and smoothly and can be removed quite easily.

 

I quite like the relatively restrained looks and style, it has many external design points similar to the Jinao 500, but the section is quite different, it has a different clip and the barrel is straight with a chrome 'step' down to the finial. The only thing I don't much care for is the clip which is a bit fat and basic in design - it looks a bit cheap and 'stamped' out. The Baoer 519 is also reminiscent but with a slightly slimmer barrel but with a cap and clip à la Faber Castell. I don't think the 8182 is modelled after any particular pen to my knowledge.

 

It's by no means a Kaigelu 316, but for a fiver I have nothing really to complain about with my copy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Just received the Jinhao 8812 in rosewood finish.

 

Design - Interesting design with use of real wood elements.

 

Quality - Is very good for a pen that costs only about USD 3-4. Writes smoothly and the filler works very well contrary to what I have heard in the past. Cap is a little tight but I guess it will loosen over time.

 

Weight - Pen is a trifle heavy and must be used unposted.

 

Feel - The pen definitely feels better than the larger 450 and 750.

 

Nib - It can be easily removed and replaced though its not a #6 size. Probably a smaller #5. Haven't tried replacing it with other nibs. The feed can be moved up or down to increase wetness if needed.

Edited by rramesh

"Sitting and writing for an hour consumes only 50 calories, but the satisfaction is PRICELESS."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I, too, bought the rosewood Jinhao 8812 and, in fact, am using it as a daily writer. I've had no issues with it at all and like the pen enough to have it replace my previous note jotter as a daily user. It doesn't write like my Watermans but at $5-$9 shipping included, it is bulletproof. I also agree with rramesh's post. I have and use the Jinhao x750, x450, and 159. The 8812 is my preference followed by the x450. The 159 is a gorgeous $10 pen, very heavy, seemingly well-made, and with a screw-on cap but, alas, it's just too large for my hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...
  • 1 month later...

Okay, my thoughts having written about five pages in my engineering notebook with this pen:

 

1) It's a very smooth writer.

2) The converter is, as people have said, problematic. Mine would only suck to about halfway full. I have a different International-size converter around here somewhere, I'll give it a try the next time I clean/fill the pen.

3) I post the cap. But I have large hands (I wear men's size-XL gloves) so what's balanced for me may not be for you.

4) The size and weight is pleasing to me. My Pilot Metropolitan is too light and small and feels like a toy pen to me.

5) I like the looks. It is restrained. Not gaudy like some of the Jinhao pens. The barrel is supposedly real wood. It feels like real wood, anyhow. I like the look and feel of natural materials on a fountain pen. I hate plastic disposable pens, they're too symbolic of our plastic disposable lives. I like pens with lots of natural materials -- metal, ceramic, wood. They are pleasing to me. An aesthetic choice, but mine to make for me.

 

Will I buy another one? Probably not. From what I understand, it's a crapshoot as to what you get when you order a Jinhao pen. I got a good one, other people have gotten turkeys. Mine doesn't have any of the problems that have been mentioned here (loose nib etc.), so I got lucky once, I probably won't get lucky again. Still, I'm happy with the pen. It punches above its class, at least if you get one of the "good" ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26772
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...