Jump to content

Parker Vacumatic Dating Codes


rachels

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have two double jewel Parker vacumatics that have both a date code and a dot. On one the code is (27.) and on the other the code is (.46.). My research tells me that if it's from the 1940s there will be dots and if its from the 1930s there will be two numbers (quarter + year). Are there any anomalies that allow for both? I only wonder because they both have striated double jewels and no blue diamond, which makes me think 30s...but the dots are throwing me off.

 

I can post some pictures but won't be able to take them until Sunday at the earliest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • rachels

    4

  • pen lady

    1

  • Florida Blue

    1

  • Chouffleur

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

For excellent articles about Parker date codes, check out Richard Binders site (www.richardspens.com) or www.parkerpens.net. Good luck with your research.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As pen lady mentioned: http://www.richardspens.com/?design=pkr_dates

 

Google is your friend. Well, except for the whole military robot thing. ;-)

 

"Notes:

  1. There was a period during which the two quarter-designation schemes overlapped; some 1938 pens bear a date code of .28. (both quarter-designation schemes indicating the second quarter of the year)."

Edited by Chouffleur
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

"Notes:

  1. There was a period during which the two quarter-designation schemes overlapped; some 1938 pens bear a date code of .28. (both quarter-designation schemes indicating the second quarter of the year)."

 

Funny, while researching this I had been to that page many times, but never scrolled all the way to the bottom where this foot note was. Thank you!

 

It still doesn't make complete sense with the codes on my particular pens (to me). According to Richard Binder's site my pen that has a (.27) should be (.27.) to infer second quarter and the (.46.) pen should have no dots to infer fourth quarter. Eh...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It still doesn't make complete sense with the codes on my particular pens (to me). According to Richard Binder's site my pen that has a (.27) should be (.27.) to infer second quarter and the (.46.) pen should have no dots to infer fourth quarter. Eh...

 

The reason Parker switched from two numbers to a single number and the dots was to prevent an overlap with the dates. If Parker kept the original dating scheme a pen made in the 2nd quarter of 1936 and 1946 would have the same date code.

 

If your pen has the two numbers (regardless of the dots) it would be a 1930s date code.

Parker: Sonnet Flighter, Rialto Red Metallic Laque, IM Chiseled Gunmetal, Latitude Stainless, 45 Black, Duovac Blue Pearl Striped, 51 Standard Black, Vac Jr. Black, 51 Aero Black, 51 Vac Blue Cedar, Duofold Jr. Lapis, 51 Aero Demi Black, 51 Aero Demi Teal, 51 Aero Navy Gray, Duofold Pastel Moire Violet, Vac Major Golden Brown, Vac Deb. Emerald, 51 Vac Dove Gray, Vac Major Azure, Vac Jr. Silver Pearl, 51 Vac Black GF Cap, 51 Forest Green GF cap, Vac Jr. Silver Pearl, Duovac Senior Green & Gold, Duovac Deb. Black, Challenger Black, 51 Aero Midnight, Vac. Emerald Jr., Challenger Gray Pearl, 51 Vac Black, Duofold Int. Black, Duofold Jr. Red.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

It still doesn't make complete sense with the codes on my particular pens (to me). According to Richard Binder's site my pen that has a (.27) should be (.27.) to infer second quarter and the (.46.) pen should have no dots to infer fourth quarter. Eh...

 

"Early pens have two digits with no dots." The admired and excellent Mr. Binder´s website is not very successful in this aspect. Really this fpens have 2 digits... and 0, 1 or 2 dots.

 

Probably this recent post will help you get a better view of this period:

 

Some questions about barrels and nibs date code with 2 digits and dots.

 

At least from thrid quarter of 1934 and until at least the second quarter of 1938 we can observe this code system.

 

In this system of two digits, we only can see three options(*), namely: without dot, with 1 dot and with 2 dots, so my theory is that, in these cases, the DOTS MEAN MONTHS of quarter, so, e.g.:

 

27 June-1937 (third month of the second quarter of 1937)

.37. July-1937 (first month of the third quarter)

37. August 1937 (second month of the third quarter)

37 September 1937 (third month of the third quarter)

.47. October 1937 (first month fourth quarter)

47. November 1937 (second month fourth quarter)

47 December 1937 (third month fourth quarter)

.18. January 1938

18. February 1938

18 March 1938

.28. April 1938

 

(*) In contrast to code date single-digit that there are 4 options (0, 1, 2 or 3 dots) as many quarters.

 

Some examples of this two digits period:

 

http://s7.postimg.org/u00elzbln/1934_3_T_Parker_Vacumatic_Lazard.jpg

 

 

http://s17.postimg.org/il6cswujj/Lazard_Parker_Vacumatic_2digits_dots.jpg

Edited by Lazard 20
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33559
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26744
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...