Jump to content

The Fountain Pen Network uses (functional) cookies. Read the FPN Privacy Policy for more info.  To remove this message, please click here to accept the use of cookies


Registration on the Fountain Pen Network

Dearest Visitor of the little Fountain Pen Nut house on the digital prairie,

Due to the enormous influx of spammers, it is no longer possible to handle valditions in the traditional way. For registrations we therefore kindly and respectfully request you to send an email with your request to our especially created email address. This email address is register at fountainpennetwork dot com. Please include your desired user name, and after validation we will send you a return email containing the validation key, normally wiithin a week.

Thank you very much in advance!
The FPN Admin Team






Photo

Parson's Essential Vs. Pelikan M200

italix parsons essential pelikan m200

  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Claudiu

Claudiu

    Mint

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPip
  • 54 posts
  • Location:Transylvania
  • Flag:

Posted 27 March 2015 - 21:59

My question is not which one is better, because that's obviously subjective. I have an Italix Parson's Essential for more than two years and I'm still enthusiastic about it, although I'm not using it daily, but I try to, with every occasion. The writing experience is absolutely fantastic.

 

I wonder if, as a n00b, I'll feel any difference if I'd use a Pelikan M200, compared to Italix Parson's Essential. Pelikan is a little bit more expensive, but I like to looks of it and it has some good reviews. Parson's Essential gives a smooth feeling when touching the paper and I wonder if a Pelikan M200 would top that (I'm also considering having the M400 nib upgrade). 

 

Anyone around here have both pens and could tell me if M200 would be smoother?


The most important thing in life is to be yourself. Unless you can be Batman. Always be Batman.

Sponsored Content

#2 Ste_S

Ste_S

    Extremely Rare

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 311 posts
  • Flag:

Posted 28 March 2015 - 00:06

I don't have a Parson's Essential, but I do have a Pelikan M200 amongst many other pens.

 

You will notice a difference - it's a different size for a start. It's also a piston filler as opposed to the c/c of the Italix. Pelikan finishes tend to be more conservative, and I would tend towards one of the demo versions in the M2xx range.

 

As for nibs... I've found most modern steel nibbed pens to be roughly equivalently smooth. Where noticeable smoothness differences happen is in the wetness and flow of pens, and the lubrication and flow of the ink.

In that regard Pelikan pens tend to be wet by default, the M200 Broad I have is probably the wettest pen I own. The cheap Pelikan Twist being no slouch in that regard either



#3 cleosmama

cleosmama

    Vintage

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 649 posts
  • Location:Lafayette, Louisiana
  • Flag:

Posted 28 March 2015 - 00:17

I have both, and they are completely different writing experiences. They are both smooth writers, but the M200, like Ste-S says, is a smaller pen with a smaller grip section. It is much lighter, too, than the Parson's. They are both wet writers in my judgment, though I do feel more feedback with the M200 than the Parson's. Compared to the M200, the Parson's has a more solid feel; the Pelikan is really very light plastic where the Parson's is pretty solid feeling. 



#4 Danny Kaffee

Danny Kaffee

    Rare

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 125 posts
  • Flag:

Posted 28 March 2015 - 00:42

If you choose the M200, don't waste the money with a gold nib.  The gold-plated steel nib is excellent, and in many ways is better than the gold nib.  It's got more spring and life.

 

My M200 (medium) is silky smooth and I'm a finicky pen user.  Although the medium nib is a touch broader than most mediums I've used.

 

My only complaint with the M200 is that the threads are where my middle finger normally holds the pen.


Edited by Danny Kaffee, 28 March 2015 - 00:43.


#5 Claudiu

Claudiu

    Mint

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPip
  • 54 posts
  • Location:Transylvania
  • Flag:

Posted 28 March 2015 - 07:31

Thanks for your replies, this kinda settles it for me. I think I'm better of without spending money on a M200, since i like heavy pens better than light, plastic ones. So maybe the next on my list would be a Churchman's Prescriptor.


The most important thing in life is to be yourself. Unless you can be Batman. Always be Batman.

#6 FountainPages

FountainPages

    Runs With Sharp Pens!

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 504 posts
  • Location:Toledo,Ohio
  • Flag:

Posted 29 March 2015 - 00:48

I have both and while both are nice pens, I don't see all the fuss about the Italix. It is heavy and a good pen but far from the be all, end all of fountain pens. Yes, it is smooth but many nibs are smooth. Yes, it is handworked but many are. The Italix are no better than many others.


letterji9.png

I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.

Mark Twain

#7 jkingrph

jkingrph

    Collectors Item

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 970 posts
  • Location:E.Texas, NE Louisiana
  • Flag:

Posted 29 March 2015 - 01:31

I have both and will say in black one is as conservative as the other.  As for writing both are very good, nice and wet.   The Parsons Essential offers a greater choice of nibs, italic , stub, cursive, ect for a total of 18 nib choices, compared to 4 for the Pelikan.   The Pelikan is constructed of plastic and is very lightweight whereas the Parsons is made of lacquered brass and feels much more substantial in the hand.  The traditional Pelican is a piston feed, although they are now offering a cartridge;/convertor model, the Parsons is cartridge/convertor only.  The Parsons is available in solid black, burgundy, green, and a mottled amber and blue model, with matching rollerbals and ballpoints in most colors.

 

Pelikans website shows 8 colors, but there are others available, I just got one in café crème, a beige/coffee brown color, and I just saw a cognac( clear amber) demonstrator,and there are probably others out that I did not see while writing  this.

 

You will not go wrong with either.

 


Regards

Jeff

#8 Bemo

Bemo

    Vintage

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 423 posts
  • Flag:

Posted 29 March 2015 - 01:33

I have the Italix and 4 m200's. I prefer the Pelikan overall, however, I have had one steel nib that was pretty rough. The benefit of the Italix is you're assured that the nib will be good. But I believe I have 10 Pelikan's and only 1 Italix.



#9 Claudiu

Claudiu

    Mint

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPip
  • 54 posts
  • Location:Transylvania
  • Flag:

Posted 29 March 2015 - 06:26

I have both and while both are nice pens, I don't see all the fuss about the Italix. It is heavy and a good pen but far from the be all, end all of fountain pens. Yes, it is smooth but many nibs are smooth. Yes, it is handworked but many are. The Italix are no better than many others.

 

It's cheap, compared with other pens that look/behave the same.


The most important thing in life is to be yourself. Unless you can be Batman. Always be Batman.





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: italix parsons essential, pelikan m200



Sponsored Content




|