Jump to content

Parker Sonnet Finishes And Datecodes


mitto

Recommended Posts

This is my (corrected) list.

If anyone can find any errors please let me know.

 

 

1979 - -- -- NL NI Date coding begins in the US

1980 - QE QC QL QI Date coding begins in the UK and France
1981 - UE UC UL UI
1982 - AE AC AL AI
1983 - LE LC LL LI
1984 - IE IC IL II
1985 - TE TC TL TI
1986 - YE YC YL YI

1987 - PE PC PL PI
1988 - IIIE IIE IE E (change)
1989 - IIIN IIN IN N

1990 - IIIQ IIQ IQ Q
1991 - IIIU IIU IU U
1992 - IIIA IIA IA A
1993 - IIIL IIL IL L
1994 - IIII III II I
1995 - IIIT IIT IT T
1996 - IIIY IIY IY Y

1997 - IIIP IIP IP P
1998 - IIIE IIE IE E
1999 - IIIN IIN IN N

2000 - Q.III Q.II Q.I Q (change)
2001 - U.III U.II U.I U
2002 - A.III A.II A.I A
2003 - L.III L.II L.I L
2004 - I.III I.II I.I I
2005 - T.III T.II T.I T
2006 - Y.III Y.II Y.I Y

2007 - P.III P.II P.I P
2008 - E.III E.II E.I E
2009 - N.III N.II N.I N

2010 - IIIQ IIQ IQ Q (change)
2011 - IIIU IIU IU U

2012 - IIIA IIA IA A

2013 - IIIL IIL IL L

2014 - IIII III II I

2015 – IIIT IIT IT T

Peter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • mitto

    13

  • Matlock

    6

  • Florida Blue

    2

  • columela

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Matlock is correct for upto 2015 datecodes. Yet , going a little ahead of time here are datecodes for 2016 - 2020 :-

 

2016 - IIIY IIY IY Y

2017 - IIIP IIP IP P

2018 - IIIE IIE IE E

2019 - IIIN IIN IN N

2020 - Q.III Q.II Q.I Q (change).

Edited by mitto

Khan M. Ilyas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gentlemen,

 

Every site I can find with Google lists the original reading of the date codes. I trust that you are right -- I'd like to find the accurate information. Where are you seeing it?

We were not seeing it anywhere. We just corrected the list appearing elsewhere. So we are the authors (lol) of this corected list. And this corrected list is as per the actual date codes appearing on the Parker pens. Edited by mitto

Khan M. Ilyas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Just reviving this old topic. Thanks for the info, so I can see that my Paker Sonnet metal and pearl dates from the last quarter of 2011.

Cheers

“Waste no more time arguing about what a good man should be. Be one.”

Marcus Aurelius, Meditations

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Has Parker ever used a period at the end of their fourth quarter date codes? I have a Sonnet with a date code of I. and since it's a Monochrome it's three years early. This pen is exactly duplicate of an existing copy that I believe is real. Even the packaging seems to be correct except the date code. Anyone have any ideas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has Parker ever used a period at the end of their fourth quarter date codes? I have a Sonnet with a date code of I. and since it's a Monochrome it's three years early. This pen is exactly duplicate of an existing copy that I believe is real. Even the packaging seems to be correct except the date code. Anyone have any ideas?

 

Can you post some photos please?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am very late to this post, sorry

 

Only just read it.

 

The Parker Sonnet was developed at Newhaven and produced at Meru.

 

One of it designers was Geoff Hollington from Brighton UK.

( TF has an interview with him on his site )

 

There were very few concept ( pre prototype, non functioning ) pens produced in late 1991 at Newhaven, the nib design was initially different to the production model.

 

The production started in late 1992.

 

 

Mitto,

 

Sir,

 

Would you kind enough to post some images of the pen ‘ flighter CT is datecoded as IIQ’ that you have mentioned, I would like to look at them please.

 

Thank you.

 

Nice car shown on your Bio pic………. Yours?

 

Personally I like the Lotus Elan plus 2 in red……smiling……..

Parker Sonnet CONCEPT FP ab fpn 1.jpg

Parker Sonnet CONCEPT FP ab fpn 2.jpg

Parker Sonnet CONCEPT FP ab fpn 3.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Parker date codes change every 10 years and spell out "QUALITY PEN."

On a side note, I have viewed the date code list at https://parkerpens.net/codekey.html many times, and I have never once noticed that bit about the pattern.

 

Cool!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26771
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...