Jump to content

Review: The " Swan " Pen/ The Fountain Pen Used By Professor James Moriarty Revisited


NathanLow

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • NathanLow

    13

  • Cepasaccus

    9

  • Alex2014

    3

  • Ceilidh

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Cepasaccus,

 

Hi,I find 2 of your pen's feed in front nib are almost same length,with what I see in the http://vintageflex.com/MabieTodd.html pens for sale,such as Mabie Todd & Bard "Swan" 1880's,"Swan" 1503 and "Swan" 1500.And as the "Swan" 1880's,which made in mid of 1880's,if is true,it subvert http://www.fountainpen.it/Swan article by saying "The name Swan was introduce as a trademark since about 1890..."

 

The feed in front nib of my pen are shorter than yours,still,I don't know what is the distinct of feed's length.Maybe it had been modify before,and I haven't disassemble the pen yet,just afraid of couldn't restructure it.

 

Best regards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure what feed this 1880s pen has. The end is not visible and there is no silver wire. So the dating might be correct, or not. They gave no reason for this. And there is sticking something from the other pen part. Is it part of the feed?

 

I once carefully removed the feed from such a pen. It went well until nearly the end, then I had two parts in my hand as suddenly the lower feed tonge broke off. So I cannot really recommend disassembling such a feed.

 

Cepasaccus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I recently bought an identical Mabie Todd & Co. Chatelaine like NathanLow's one (btw excellent story and review!). The same printing on the barrel, the same crowns and band. The seller dated it "1912, in original box". Surprise: the original box was a Mabie Todd & Bard one! I supposed the box could be one from the stock used by the manufacturer after 1907, or, maybe, a reseller replacement. Logically, in both cases, the FP could be dated early 1912, probably 1908-9. Reading Cepassacus' posts, my indecision regarding the dating is now bigger. In any case, I like the Chatelaine MT a lot.

 

post-109852-0-98112600-1414827023_thumb.jpg

Edited by Alex2014
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is my oldest Mabie Todd with this patent date of 1877 for which I could not find any suitable patent. It has an excellent nib. Writing with it feels like painting. When I got it it was full of dried up ink. I poured it out, filled in new ink and it wrote.

 

Cepasaccus

post-91927-0-49495100-1414837514_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is my oldest Mabie Todd with this patent date of 1877 for which I could not find any suitable patent. It has an excellent nib. Writing with it feels like painting. When I got it it was full of dried up ink. I poured it out, filled in new ink and it wrote.

 

Cepasaccus

 

Chapeau bas ! :o The oldest adds for such an over/under feed in Moak's book date from 1895. The only patent of Mabie in 1877 I found here. As for Swan FP's, it seems (see David Nishimura's site) that they are based on William W. Stewart's patent from 1878 (here)

Edited by Alex2014
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have looked through all the US patents. There is no patent (submitted or issued) from 9th of August 1877 related to fountain pens. As issue date it is not even possible. The patents you have shown are from about the correct time from the correct persons, but IMHO it does not look from the pictures, that they are related to this fountain pen. The first related patent from the correct persons is US426692 from 1890 (submitted 1889) which shows the feed with silver wire.

 

So I have a few dates relevant to this pen:

- 1877-08-09: Patent date imprint

- 1884: Date provided by websites regarding the fountain pen production start of Mabie Todd and also the opening of their UK office. (I do have this pen from the UK.)

- 1889/1890: Related patent submission and issue date.

- 1895: Date provided by websites as introduction of the Swan trademark.

 

Cepasaccus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I got recently this Mabie Todd & Bard, 3012. The imprint on the barrel is

 

THE SWAN PEN

PAT. FEB 8 81 FEB 21 82 MAR 6 88

MABIE TODD & BARD NEW YORK

 

post-109852-0-65613000-1416042364_thumb.jpg

 

The box is marked MABIE TODD & BARD as well, although there is an over print (a golden pen) with MABIE TODD & Co, probably a later over print. I cannot but suppose that the FP was manufactured just before the name of the brand was changed in 1907. The user instructions inside the box mention the FP was sold by the London office, 93 Cheapside.

 

post-109852-0-04141000-1416042373_thumb.jpg

Edited by Alex2014
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 3012 is a very nice pen. It is not expensive, the cap can seal the pen quite well (if it has no air holes) and, most of all, the nibs are excellent.

 

The &Co. seems to have been used in parallel with &Bard. So I would not to much emphasis on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26772
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...