Jump to content

My First Etruria!


dms525

Recommended Posts

The .9 stub is a gold nib. It has line variation, but the corners are rounded. It isn't crisp, or edged, so it less particular about the angle it is held at.

 

gary

 

Hmmm ... Having looked around, the only 0.9 mm "italic" nib by Stipula I can find is a steel nib. If you have a source for gold Stipula 0.9 mm stub or italic nibs, would you please share it?

 

ASAIK, there is no clear distinction between crisp and cursive italic nor between cursive italic and stub. It appears to be a continuous variable in shoulder roundness and in line differentiation. If this is incorrect, please educate me.

 

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • dms525

    11

  • kazoolaw

    4

  • RMN

    3

  • Raskolnikov

    3

Top Posters In This Topic

David,

 

The nib is an 18K 0.9 stub which was an option on the 991 LE. I have no idea whether you can buy one now, not having been to the on-line Stipula store in ages.

 

I bet Richard Binder could give a numerical definition of stub, cursive italic, and italic. I cannot. His website, on the reference pages, discusses all 3 of these nibs. Look for Nibs II.

 

I would say it is a range of corner sharpness and horizontal nib thinness. Not much help on that score I'm afraid.

 

gary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David,

 

The nib is an 18K 0.9 stub which was an option on the 991 LE. I have no idea whether you can buy one now, not having been to the on-line Stipula store in ages.

 

I bet Richard Binder could give a numerical definition of stub, cursive italic, and italic. I cannot. His website, on the reference pages, discusses all 3 of these nibs. Look for Nibs II.

 

I would say it is a range of corner sharpness and horizontal nib thinness. Not much help on that score I'm afraid.

 

gary

 

Thanks for the additional information, Gary. Currently, the only italic/stub nib Stipula lists is a 14K 1.1mm nib. There is the "52" 18K nib, but that's a different animal.

 

I'm familiar with Richard Binder's excellent explanations of the different special nibs. John Mottishaw has similar information on www.nibs.com. I don't think any one disagrees about the nature of the differences. The question is whether any of the differences are really more than matters of degree. I think the question is interesting enough to merit a new topic.

 

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I remember Stipula had a vast range of specialty nibs until they decided to bring that down 2 years ago.

 

I am not sure about the current line-up. I think Wimg knows more about that.

He may drop by here, or you could PM or mail him.

 

 

D.ick

~

KEEP SAFE, WEAR A MASK, KEEP A DISTANCE.

Freedom exists by virtue of self limitation.

~

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

1.1 stip nibs feel sharper than 0.9 ones, if alone for two reasons:

 

1. The thickness of the nib is the same (horizontal line thickness), and therefore the sharpness ratio is a lot larger for the 1.1 vs. the 0.9 (about 3.2 vs 2.6, although this may vary to some degree)

2. The increase in width means that the nib is much more sensitive to holding it correctly; the wider nib "hooks" more easily on paper and therefore also appears sharper.

 

The 1.1 nibs are still available in gold, as are F, M and 52 degree ("zoom"), all others no longer. This is due to the fact that Bock wanted minimum orders of 500 nibs of each type, and for a small company like Stipula it really becomes untenable to have 10 types of nibs in three variants (30 nibs) at the high gold prices we have these days - we're talking 15000 expensive nibs here, to be held in stock doing nothing. Currently they are at approximately 10, which already is a drain on available resources.

 

Warm regards, Wim

the Mad Dutchman
laugh a little, love a little, live a lot; laugh a lot, love a lot, live forever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.1 stip nibs feel sharper than 0.9 ones, if alone for two reasons:

 

1. The thickness of the nib is the same (horizontal line thickness), and therefore the sharpness ratio is a lot larger for the 1.1 vs. the 0.9 (about 3.2 vs 2.6, although this may vary to some degree)

2. The increase in width means that the nib is much more sensitive to holding it correctly; the wider nib "hooks" more easily on paper and therefore also appears sharper.

 

The 1.1 nibs are still available in gold, as are F, M and 52 degree ("zoom"), all others no longer. This is due to the fact that Bock wanted minimum orders of 500 nibs of each type, and for a small company like Stipula it really becomes untenable to have 10 types of nibs in three variants (30 nibs) at the high gold prices we have these days - we're talking 15000 expensive nibs here, to be held in stock doing nothing. Currently they are at approximately 10, which already is a drain on available resources.

 

Warm regards, Wim

 

Thanks, Wim. I have a 1.1 mm stub being fitted to a Tuscany Dreams Etruria. I hope to get it back in a couple more weeks. I'm eager to see how it compares to my custom-ground nibs on other pens.

 

Your "reason 2." is a new thought to me. It makes a lot of sense.

 

David

Edited by dms525
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26771
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...