Jump to content

Monte Rosa - Montblanc Or Not Montblanc


FrElip

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have read here in FPN, as much as I could about Monte Rosa, and have seen a lot of pics of Monte Rosa pens.

Some have the Montblanc logo and some don't, some have the name engraved in the cap near the clip, some have the name on the bottom of the cap, some have de nib exposed and some don't...

 

Is there any other Monte Rosa besides the Monte Rosa from Montblanc ?

 

I gained a Monte Rosa pen (among others) from my grandfather, but it isn't mentioned Montblanc anywhere, it doesn't have the montblanc logo and the nib isn't exposed (as the 042).

The word Monte Rosa is engraved arround the cap, near the bottom.

 

It's like the one from the link below, but slightly different in the barrel near the thread.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-Monte-Rosa-piston-filler-german-made-/150659567780

 

I'm not wanting it to be a Montblanc pen :) I just would like to know what it is.

 

I can post some photos of my Monte Rosa pen, but honestly, it is in so bad shape/looking all over the pen, that I even am ashamed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FrElip

    10

  • mase001

    4

  • JLS1

    4

  • GRJP

    3

Top Posters In This Topic

As said above, Monte Rosa pens are definitely MB pens, but it would probably help if you provided a pic or two to confirm.

 

FWIW, at the time the Monte Rosas were being produced, MB sold a larger variety of pens than they do today (much like today's Pilot or Parker) to a wider variety of markets - I believe the Monte Rosa was aimed at the student market and would be MB's student pen (or schulfuller). I've heard that Monte Rosas were/are pretty good pens, so fixing up your grandfather's pen (if needed) might give you a great writer, as well as a keepsake!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the answers.

I'll post some photos later. But please, don't expel me from the forum, because the pen really is in bad bad shape and aspect.

Be compreensive :) i have received it as is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The MonteRosa is a very fine writer and build quality wise it feels like a sturdy pen. I have one ((this model to be exact) and I can say that while not as nice to write with as the 334 1/2 it is a very good writer and a keeper. They are MBs and quite good ones to use at that, although I can only speak for the one I have and the general impression I've heard.

Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen. - Winston Churchill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the answers.

I'll post some photos later. But please, don't expel me from the forum, because the pen really is in bad bad shape and aspect.

Be compreensive :) i have received it as is.

 

Don't worry - we FPN'ers are a very understanding bunch of people. As far as I know, no one has ever been expelled for bad pictures. (Bad language, maybe... :hmm1: )

 

Oh yeah, :W2FPN:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the pictures aren't quite good once they were taken with cell phone, but I was refering to the pen itself. Then pen really isn't in good shape (concerning the image of the pen).

 

Here are the pictures, and please, once more, I apologise for the pens aspect (besides de rust in the cap, some rubber band has been in contact with the pen trough the years, and got stuck all over the pen):

In the third picture, looks like is missing some ring where the hood screw to the barrel. Don't you think?

What more can you tell me about this pen? I am interested in recover this ben to the good days.

 

http://imageshack.us/a/img812/4839/fotografia4r.th.jpg

 

http://imageshack.us/a/img341/5675/fotografia5v.th.jpg

 

http://imageshack.us/a/img706/7172/fotografia3b.th.jpg

 

http://imageshack.us/a/img845/7680/fotografia2uc.th.jpg

 

http://imageshack.us/a/img842/6056/fotografia1it.th.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To answer the original question, yes, there were Monte Rosa pens not manufactured by Montblanc. There was a Swiss company, Dimmler, that sold pens under that name. They were made by various manufacturers, (I think) not including Montblanc.

 

Although I am prepared to believe that the pen in question was manufactured by (or for) Montblanc if there is some evidence to support that, there are Monte Rosa pens with no Hamburg provenance.

 

The only Monte Rosa pen I own, an 042, says both Montblanc and Monte Rosa on the cap, and MONTBLANC is in capital letters much larger than the upper and lower case letters that said MonteRosa in script. Other 042s have an imprint with Monterosa in larger type. In either case the word "Montblanc" is present and I don't think Montblanc was trying to conceal its connection with the Monte Rosa pens it sold.

 

However, I am not a Montblanc specialist, far less a Dimmler specialist, and would defer to the opinion of someone like PenParadise, or Tom Westerich of penboard.de, both of whom post to this forum.

 

PS: So far as I know, Dimmler was in Zurich and made and/or sold Monte Rosa pens before World War II and for a while afterward. The pen we are asked to comment upon has a nib and an overall look that seem too recent for Dimmler pens. And it may be that the Montblanc imprint has simply worn off. One awaits expert opinion, or even the opinion of an FPNer who owns an example of the same pen.

Edited by Jerome Tarshis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To answer the original question, yes, there were Monte Rosa pens not manufactured by Montblanc. There was a Swiss company, Dimmler, that sold pens under that name. They were made by various manufacturers, (I think) not including Montblanc.

 

Although I am prepared to believe that the pen in question was manufactured by (or for) Montblanc if there is some evidence to support that, there are Monte Rosa pens with no Hamburg provenance.

 

The only Monte Rosa pen I own, an 042, says both Montblanc and Monte Rosa on the cap, and MONTBLANC is in capital letters much larger than the upper and lower case letters that said MonteRosa in script. Other 042s have an imprint with Monterosa in larger type. In either case the word "Montblanc" is present and I don't think Montblanc was trying to conceal its connection with the Monte Rosa pens it sold.

 

However, I am not a Montblanc specialist, far less a Dimmler specialist, and would defer to the opinion of someone like PenParadise, or Tom Westerich of penboard.de, both of whom post to this forum.

 

PS: So far as I know, Dimmler was in Zurich and made and/or sold Monte Rosa pens before World War II and for a while afterward. The pen we are asked to comment upon has a nib and an overall look that seem too recent for Dimmler pens. And it may be that the Montblanc imprint has simply worn off. One awaits expert opinion, or even the opinion of an FPNer who owns an example of the same pen.

 

Very interesting information. Thank you for that.

However, in the cap, near the Monte Rosa word, it's written either "made in Germany".

 

Does this change anything?

I will wait for the montblanc expert user commets.

Edited by FrElip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To answer the original question, yes, there were Monte Rosa pens not manufactured by Montblanc. There was a Swiss company, Dimmler, that sold pens under that name. They were made by various manufacturers, (I think) not including Montblanc.

 

Although I am prepared to believe that the pen in question was manufactured by (or for) Montblanc if there is some evidence to support that, there are Monte Rosa pens with no Hamburg provenance.

 

The only Monte Rosa pen I own, an 042, says both Montblanc and Monte Rosa on the cap, and MONTBLANC is in capital letters much larger than the upper and lower case letters that said MonteRosa in script. Other 042s have an imprint with Monterosa in larger type. In either case the word "Montblanc" is present and I don't think Montblanc was trying to conceal its connection with the Monte Rosa pens it sold.

 

However, I am not a Montblanc specialist, far less a Dimmler specialist, and would defer to the opinion of someone like PenParadise, or Tom Westerich of penboard.de, both of whom post to this forum.

 

PS: So far as I know, Dimmler was in Zurich and made and/or sold Monte Rosa pens before World War II and for a while afterward. The pen we are asked to comment upon has a nib and an overall look that seem too recent for Dimmler pens. And it may be that the Montblanc imprint has simply worn off. One awaits expert opinion, or even the opinion of an FPNer who owns an example of the same pen.

 

Very interesting information. Thank you for that.

However, in the cap, near the Monte Rosa word, it's written either "made in Germany".

 

Does this change anything?

I will wait for the montblanc expert user commets.

 

I found a similar pen to your model here. By looking at the description & some of the pictures, it looks like there should be a MB 'star' at or near the top of the clip. I can't tell from your pictures whether there is one, so could you check and let us know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I found a similar pen to your model here. By looking at the description & some of the pictures, it looks like there should be a MB 'star' at or near the top of the clip. I can't tell from your pictures whether there is one, so could you check and let us know?

 

Indeed, the outside is very similar. But the nib isn't. Mine is inside the hood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I stated in the 1st response to this thread, yes this is a Monte Rosa made by Montblanc.

 

More specifically it looks to be a Reference # 41 or 401 with diamond shaped ink windows and slip cap.

 

This particular Monte Rosa was from roughly 1961 to 1967.

 

They came in both cartridge and piston filler.

 

If you'd like to see them in print, please check Rosler's Collectible Stars Page 52 and 53.

 

Here are some small pictures to help:

http://i275.photobucket.com/albums/jj281/ducati748rs/photo1_zpsef1551fc.jpg

 

http://i275.photobucket.com/albums/jj281/ducati748rs/photo2_zps6edfe155.jpg

 

I hope this helps.

 

Mason

Edited by mase001
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I stated in the 1st response to this thread, yes this is a Monte Rosa made by Montblanc.

 

More specifically it looks to be a Reference # 41 or 401 with diamond shaped ink windows and slip cap.

 

This particular Monte Rosa was from roughly 1961 to 1967.

 

They came in both cartridge and piston filler.

 

If you'd like to see them in print, please check Rosler's Collectible Stars Page 52 and 53.

 

Here are some small pictures to help:

http://i275.photobucket.com/albums/jj281/ducati748rs/photo1_zpsef1551fc.jpg

 

http://i275.photobucket.com/albums/jj281/ducati748rs/photo2_zps6edfe155.jpg

 

I hope this helps.

 

Mason

 

wonderful.

To me, it looks like the red pen. But in the the red i dont see the diamond shape window.

I said the red one because of the metal ring between the hood and the barrel. But in mine, i dont have the ring, it could be seem the gap.

And all those except the red have a polished ring in the bottom of the cap with the lettering. Mine is like the cap from the red... All brushed with the lettering.

Edited by FrElip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

they are good pens for the money

Pens are like watches , once you start a collection, you can hardly go back. And pens like all fine luxury items do improve with time

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Mase001: Thanks for sharing this - it's very helpful to know the Monte Rosa came in all shapes/sizes!

 

@ FrElip: It sounds like you have a real MB Monte Rosa - congratulations! BTW, do you know if it's a piston version or a cartridge/converter (CC) version?

Edited by JLS1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct. It's a piston filler. Anyway, judging form the rear of the hood, there is no cartdrige to fit there.

 

I'm sad that it misses the metal ring in mine, and threading de hood in the barrel, even squeezing it tight, the gap from metal ring could be noticed :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct. It's a piston filler. Anyway, judging form the rear of the hood, there is no cartdrige to fit there.

 

I'm sad that it misses the metal ring in mine, and threading de hood in the barrel, even squeezing it tight, the gap from metal ring could be noticed :wacko:

 

The ring was part of the cap closure system IIRC and it's likely the cap will not be secure and the nib may dry out more without it.

 

My Website

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33567
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26750
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...