Jump to content







Photo

PR Velvet Black


  • Please log in to reply
32 replies to this topic

#1 Catsmelt

Catsmelt

    Extremely Rare

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 366 posts

Posted 05 January 2007 - 13:50

Does FPN need another black ink review? I didn't see anything for Velvet Black, so I thought I'd give it a shot.

Velvet Black has been brought up in other discussions, but not reviewed on it's own merits, I believe. In reference to it, some have mentioned a longish drying time and the ink having some brownish overtones.

In my experience the drying time is neither short nor long. With regard to the overtones, my eyes aren't discerning enough to notice anything -- until I did the soak test and those brownish overtones come through...

More images will follow this post.

Attached Images

  • PR_Velvet_Black.jpg


#2 Catsmelt

Catsmelt

    Extremely Rare

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 366 posts

Posted 05 January 2007 - 13:51

A comparison with other common black inks:

Attached Images

  • PR_Velvet_Black_comparison.jpg


#3 Catsmelt

Catsmelt

    Extremely Rare

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 366 posts

Posted 05 January 2007 - 13:54

After a 20 minute soak in cold tap water.

Note the brown overtones from the PR while the Quink and Waterman turn bluish. Does this happen with most common black inks, or is this exhibit 1 for those prone to conspiracy that SANFORD is now forcing a common recipe between Waterman and Quink?

Attached Images

  • PR_Velvet_Black_soak.jpg


#4 Johnson

Johnson

    I like fountain pens.

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,158 posts

Posted 05 January 2007 - 14:58

Cool review! I particularly like the soak test, very interesting how the PR turns a bit brownish while the other blacks turn blue. As an aside, when I was playing around with PR Ultra Black, I noticed that when I dipped the nib of a pen filled with it in water, the color was overwhelmingly purple! blink.gif

I have a bottle of Velvet Black I haven't used yet, I'll have to give it a shot.

EDIT: Looking at the ink comparison scan again, I see the Velvet Black also displays some purple properties.

Edited by Johnson, 05 January 2007 - 14:59.

happiness isn't caused

#5 Catsmelt

Catsmelt

    Extremely Rare

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 366 posts

Posted 05 January 2007 - 15:16

QUOTE(Johnson @ Jan 5 2007, 02:58 PM)
Cool review! I particularly like the soak test, very interesting how the PR turns a bit brownish while the other blacks turn blue. As an aside, when I was playing around with PR Ultra Black, I noticed that when I dipped the nib of a pen filled with it in water, the color was overwhelmingly purple! blink.gif

I have a bottle of Velvet Black I haven't used yet, I'll have to give it a shot.

EDIT: Looking at the ink comparison scan again, I see the Velvet Black also displays some purple properties.

Your eye's aren't deceiving you...

There is a wash of brown/red/purple in the haze you see around "PR Black Velvet."

The Quinks and Waterman have a blue cloud, and it seems as if there is no trace of black left anywhere.

#6 autophile

autophile

    Silly Cat

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPip
  • 55 posts

Posted 06 January 2007 - 03:52

Maybe the ones that turned blue in the water are composed of two components, one a water-soluble black ink, and the other a water-insoluble blue ink? I guess such an ink would have to be called "blue-black"?

I hear tell of inks that are actually combinations of two types, such as "archival" ink actually being a combination of dye-based ink (which doesn't last long, but flows well) and pigment-based ink (which does last long, but doesn't flow well)...

--Rob
The Singularity Is Near!

#7 krz

krz

    ...just drawn that way.

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,325 posts
  • Location:the swamp
  • Flag:

Posted 06 January 2007 - 03:55

Thanks for the review catsmelt. I always have time to look at new blacks. smile.gif
How can you tell when you're out of invisible ink?

#8 psfred

psfred

    Donor Pen

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,126 posts

Posted 06 January 2007 - 04:30

Probably depends on what dyes are used to get black -- to the best of my knowledge, there is no "black" single component dye.

I've run paper chromatrography on several -- most are a combination of red, blue, and green inks, sometimes some yellow as well. The only one that seems to be a single spot is Noodler's black, and that may just be because the dye/dyes don't move at all in water/ethanol on cellulose paper. Silica gel TLC might show differences, but I don't have any plates to play with.

Peter

#9 autophile

autophile

    Silly Cat

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPip
  • 55 posts

Posted 06 January 2007 - 04:38

I just tried some Noodler's Polar Black. Dry or soaked in water 20 minutes, there's absolutely no difference. Aside from the paper being wrinkly, you couldn't even tell it was soaked.

--Rob
The Singularity Is Near!

#10 handlebar

handlebar

    Long distance runner!!!

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,159 posts

Posted 06 January 2007 - 18:37

Thanks for the review.This PR ink was the first i had ever used.Good ink but not my favourite black.I prefered either Visconti's or Watermans black.
Does a fine job for normal everyday use though.

JD

#11 Col

Col

    Antique

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,575 posts

Posted 07 January 2007 - 09:51

QUOTE(Catsmelt @ Jan 5 2007, 01:51 PM)
A comparison with other common black inks:

To my eyes, the PR made the other inks look blue-black even before seeing the soak test - especially the new Quink.

---
Col

#12 Catsmelt

Catsmelt

    Extremely Rare

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 366 posts

Posted 07 January 2007 - 15:01

QUOTE(Col @ Jan 7 2007, 09:51 AM)
QUOTE(Catsmelt @ Jan 5 2007, 01:51 PM)
A comparison with other common black inks:

To my eyes, the PR made the other inks look blue-black even before seeing the soak test - especially the new Quink.

---
Col

It's probably my monitor and my lack of digital imaging skills, but to my eye the real-life comparison blacks differ only by shade or saturation. The least saturated by far is the new Quink black.

I'd consider Cross blue-black cartridge as the blackest B-B I've come across, and these comparison inks still look black relative to that.

******************

And thanks for everyone else's feedback. I'm continually surprised by the interest in black ink. In a good way, that is.

#13 Col

Col

    Antique

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,575 posts

Posted 07 January 2007 - 16:12

QUOTE(Catsmelt @ Jan 7 2007, 03:01 PM)
It's probably my monitor and my lack of digital imaging skills, but to my eye the real-life comparison blacks differ only by shade or saturation.  The least saturated by far is the new Quink black.

I think there's bound to be variation on how people view the sample, depending on screen resolution, colour depth and so on; I expect your eyes looking at the paper are a more reliable benchmark in this case!

I can only say though, that when I scrolled down to see the saturated sample, somehow I wasn't entirely surprised. And when you think about it, what is it that makes one black ink less black than another, if it isn't the presence of another colour? True black (if such a thing exists beyond the dreams of alchemists) would be a complete absence of colour.

---
Col
Col

#14 Studio1F

Studio1F

    Dipped Only

  • Member - Gold

  • Pip
  • 9 posts

Posted 28 February 2009 - 01:55

QUOTE (Catsmelt @ Jan 5 2007, 10:16 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Your eye's aren't deceiving you... There is a wash of brown/red/purple in the haze you see around "PR Black Velvet."

I agree with this assessment entirely and that's why PR Velvet Black is my favorite so far for pen and wash sketching. Here is a comparison of some other wash colors with the Velvet black, which I call my benchmark.

Jan

#15 Joe in Seattle

Joe in Seattle

    Donor Pen

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,091 posts
  • Location:Seattle, Washington
  • Flag:

Posted 07 September 2010 - 23:37

Nice. My experience of V.B. In a vintage Conway-Stewart M nib is that it is black, no shading. In my wet nib it does bleed through Moleskine, but not through Rhodia grid pads.
"how do I know what I think until I write it down?"

#16 Thornton

Thornton

    Antique

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,062 posts
  • Flag:

Posted 07 September 2010 - 23:44

I was presently surprised by this ink. At the D.C. Pen Show, Pendemonium was giving out complimentary PR cartridges with every purchase. Mine happened to be Velvet Black and it flowed quite nicely in my MB 144. A true black in my opinion. I would consider buying a bottle if I didn't already have so many black inks in my collection.
Posted Image"Instant Gratification Takes Too Long."-Carrie Fisher

#17 Senate1123

Senate1123

    Mint

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPip
  • 84 posts

Posted 28 December 2010 - 13:54

Sorry to bring this back up but I'd like to see if someone else has this same issue as me.

My experience with this ink is not only that it takes forever to dry but also that certain areas don't dry at all. I've left the sample out overnight to dry but the start/finish or every letter tends to remain tacky and semi-wet. I live thetrue black color of this ink but every page I write with this ink ends up smearing onto the backside of the previous page. Or just smears all over my hand.

I've used this ink on a Rotring 600 with a fine nib as well as a Pelikan M600 with semiflex nib. Granted I have more issues on the flex nib but thr fine nib still exhibits this annoying feature. Anyone else? Maybe I just got an old crappy bottle of Velvet Black?
Posted Image

#18 Ghost Plane

Ghost Plane

    Indescribable

  • FPN Moderators

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 24,429 posts
  • Location:Florida
  • Flag:

Posted 28 December 2010 - 13:57

Some folks experience this with PR inks in general depending on the paper they're using it on. Smoother, high gloss papers tend to suffer more than more textured, absorbent papers.

I use these inks in very wet BB, O3B, and stub nibs, so I'm conscious of paper choices if I care about drying times.

A blotter may be your friend.

#19 Senate1123

Senate1123

    Mint

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPip
  • 84 posts

Posted 28 December 2010 - 15:12

Thanks for the response!

Is blotter paper any different than regular paper? I've tried placing regular copy paper over my writing and squashing the two pages under some heavy books. But the tackiness is still present at the extremes.

I am using this ink on Clairefontaine paper; Triomphe stationary, Rhodia Webbies, Habanas, etc.
Posted Image

#20 jde

jde

    Antique

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,635 posts
  • Location:how important is it, really?

Posted 28 December 2010 - 19:23

Thanks for the response!

Is blotter paper any different than regular paper? I've tried placing regular copy paper over my writing and squashing the two pages under some heavy books. But the tackiness is still present at the extremes.

I am using this ink on Clairefontaine paper; Triomphe stationary, Rhodia Webbies, Habanas, etc.


Yes, blotter paper is different. Softer and more absorbent. You can find old advertising blotters on eBay or out in the wild. Or even new blotter paper by J. Herbin at some of the retailers mentioned here on FPN (GouletPens, Pendemonium, etc.)
 
...writing only requires focus, and something to write on. —John August
...and a pen that's comfortable in the hand.—moi




[Sponsored Content]