Jump to content

Original Big 4 Fountain Pen Companies


punchy71

Recommended Posts

I read a website that said Waterman was part of the original "Big 4" fountain pen companies in the United States, but the site didn't mention who the other "Big 3" companies were. Who were the other 3 and who was the biggest of the 4 and who was the smallest? I guess it would go by market share- who had the largest slice of the pie and who had the smallest say during the golden age of American Fountain pen companies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • ANM

    4

  • Roger W.

    3

  • Florida Blue

    3

  • Richard

    2

Top Posters In This Topic

Waterman, Parker, Eversharp or Wahl Eversharp, and Sheaffer. It's hard to say who was the biggest as that title seems to have changed hands depending on the year. I wonder if we ask that question today who would today's big four be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waterman, Parker, Eversharp or Wahl Eversharp, and Sheaffer. It's hard to say who was the biggest as that title seems to have changed hands depending on the year. I wonder if we ask that question today who would today's big four be?

 

Here on FPN it's Lamy, TWSBI, Edison, and Noodler's.

 

wink.gif

In some things in life it's better to take a Zen approach. If you think too much you won't achieve your goal, wheras if you don't think and let yourself go, it shall be achieved with ease. I find this helpful in writing, kendo and music.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waterman, Parker, Eversharp or Wahl Eversharp, and Sheaffer. It's hard to say who was the biggest as that title seems to have changed hands depending on the year. I wonder if we ask that question today who would today's big four be?

 

Here on FPN it's Lamy, TWSBI, Edison, and Noodler's.

 

wink.gif

 

Ain't ever going to happen..... :rolleyes: :thumbup: :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read a website that said Waterman was part of the original "Big 4" fountain pen companies in the United States, but the site didn't mention who the other "Big 3" companies were. Who were the other 3 and who was the biggest of the 4 and who was the smallest? I guess it would go by market share- who had the largest slice of the pie and who had the smallest say during the golden age of American Fountain pen companies.

 

The original big 4 were: Waterman, Parker, Sheaffer and Conklin. Conklin declined through the 1920's and by 1930 Whal Eversharpe had supplanted Conklin on the Big 4 list.

 

NOTE: I got this information from Richard Binder's article in the April 2011 issue of Pen World.

Edited by raging.dragon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waterman, Parker, Eversharp or Wahl Eversharp, and Sheaffer. It's hard to say who was the biggest as that title seems to have changed hands depending on the year. I wonder if we ask that question today who would today's big four be?

 

Here on FPN it's Lamy, TWSBI, Edison, and Noodler's.

 

wink.gif

 

Ain't ever going to happen..... :rolleyes: :thumbup: :rolleyes:

Sure it could. I already non-moderate the first, you could take on the second. I'll send you a kilt.

San Francisco International Pen Show - The next “Funnest Pen Show” is on schedule for August 23-24-25, 2024.  Watch the show website for registration details. 
 

My PM box is usually full. Just email me: my last name at the google mail address.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as pen connoisseurs wouldn't like to admit Wearever was the largest fountain pen manufacturer in the world by the 1950s making tens of millions of pens each year easily surpassing the production of Parker or Sheaffer.

Parker: Sonnet Flighter, Rialto Red Metallic Laque, IM Chiseled Gunmetal, Latitude Stainless, 45 Black, Duovac Blue Pearl Striped, 51 Standard Black, Vac Jr. Black, 51 Aero Black, 51 Vac Blue Cedar, Duofold Jr. Lapis, 51 Aero Demi Black, 51 Aero Demi Teal, 51 Aero Navy Gray, Duofold Pastel Moire Violet, Vac Major Golden Brown, Vac Deb. Emerald, 51 Vac Dove Gray, Vac Major Azure, Vac Jr. Silver Pearl, 51 Vac Black GF Cap, 51 Forest Green GF cap, Vac Jr. Silver Pearl, Duovac Senior Green & Gold, Duovac Deb. Black, Challenger Black, 51 Aero Midnight, Vac. Emerald Jr., Challenger Gray Pearl, 51 Vac Black, Duofold Int. Black, Duofold Jr. Red.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as pen connoisseurs wouldn't like to admit Wearever was the largest fountain pen manufacturer in the world by the 1950s making tens of millions of pens each year easily surpassing the production of Parker or Sheaffer.

 

That's because we are in The Nile ;) The big 4 were Waterman, Parker, Sheaffer and Conklin.

Pedro

 

Looking for interesting Sheaffer OS Balance pens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as pen connoisseurs wouldn't like to admit Wearever was the largest fountain pen manufacturer in the world by the 1950s making tens of millions of pens each year easily surpassing the production of Parker or Sheaffer.

 

That's because we are in The Nile ;) The big 4 were Waterman, Parker, Sheaffer and Conklin.

 

It's not just a river in Egypt :roflmho:

Parker: Sonnet Flighter, Rialto Red Metallic Laque, IM Chiseled Gunmetal, Latitude Stainless, 45 Black, Duovac Blue Pearl Striped, 51 Standard Black, Vac Jr. Black, 51 Aero Black, 51 Vac Blue Cedar, Duofold Jr. Lapis, 51 Aero Demi Black, 51 Aero Demi Teal, 51 Aero Navy Gray, Duofold Pastel Moire Violet, Vac Major Golden Brown, Vac Deb. Emerald, 51 Vac Dove Gray, Vac Major Azure, Vac Jr. Silver Pearl, 51 Vac Black GF Cap, 51 Forest Green GF cap, Vac Jr. Silver Pearl, Duovac Senior Green & Gold, Duovac Deb. Black, Challenger Black, 51 Aero Midnight, Vac. Emerald Jr., Challenger Gray Pearl, 51 Vac Black, Duofold Int. Black, Duofold Jr. Red.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you speak of the big four in fountain pens in the United States, it generally refers to the golden age which could arguably be at about same time as the decline of hard rubber pens. That was the mid twenties through the forties. That was the time Conklin was in decline and also about the time the Wahl Evershsarp company began aggressively marketing fountains pens. By then they had introduced the rollerball clip, desk pens with tapers, Gold Seal Insignia and Art Deco style pens and probably some of the most beautiful plastics. In my opinion, Conklin was never part of the big four during the golden age of fountain pens. It is generally acknowledged that Sheaffer, Parker, Waterman and Wahl-Eversharp were the classic big four in fountain pen. Before then and after then other companies held some degree of prominence but those are the four of which are meant when Big Four is mentioned in respect to that historical era.

And the end of all our exploring

Will be to arrive where we started

And know the place for the first time. TS Eliot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read a website that said Waterman was part of the original "Big 4" fountain pen companies in the United States, but the site didn't mention who the other "Big 3" companies were. Who were the other 3 and who was the biggest of the 4 and who was the smallest? I guess it would go by market share- who had the largest slice of the pie and who had the smallest say during the golden age of American Fountain pen companies.

 

The original big 4 were: Waterman, Parker, Sheaffer and Conklin. Conklin declined through the 1920's and by 1930 Whal Eversharpe had supplanted Conklin on the Big 4 list.

 

NOTE: I got this information from Richard Binder's article in the April 2011 issue of Pen World.

 

I don't see how Sheaffer could be considered a part of the 'big 4" along with Conklin. Sheaffer did not become a large company until around 1926. They incorporated as a pen company in 1913 but reached the status of a large pen company with the introduction of Radite (Pyroxylin) as a fountain pen material. That corresponds with the era of Conklins decline and Eversharp's emergence. Waterman, Parker and Conklin were big companies in the early part of that century but the big four were the largest pen makers during the latter part of the 20's through the early part of the 50's. Waterman was declining by then.

And the end of all our exploring

Will be to arrive where we started

And know the place for the first time. TS Eliot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read a website that said Waterman was part of the original "Big 4" fountain pen companies in the United States, but the site didn't mention who the other "Big 3" companies were. Who were the other 3 and who was the biggest of the 4 and who was the smallest? I guess it would go by market share- who had the largest slice of the pie and who had the smallest say during the golden age of American Fountain pen companies.

 

 

None of the 4 began and ended the classic era as the largest. The one which was the largest switched between Waterman, Sheaffer and Parker. Sheaffer and Parker seesawed the honor. I don't think Eversharp was ever in the lead though. They were the only one of the big four that was a corporation before they ever made fountain pens and never a family run business like the other three. They probably ran their large company by committee and divisional heads. They were the last one to stop using hard rubber altogether and late in the game of introducing plastic pens. They had a big snafu with ball points and were never able to be considered the biggest pen company although as a business enterprise on the whole were probably the biggest in that regard.

And the end of all our exploring

Will be to arrive where we started

And know the place for the first time. TS Eliot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until 1968, Parker and Sheaffer were the only two I had ever known. My next FP was a Cross in 1998.

Jeffery

In the Irish Channel of

New Orleans, LA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's Ironic that Mabie Todd's came to be considered the "Pen of the British Empire" during the early 20th, considering the company originated in the US.

 

I don't know how 'big' they were when their US side was still doing well, but they are certainly 19th century.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see how Sheaffer could be considered a part of the 'big 4" along with Conklin...

It has to do with a variety of factors. Sheaffer introduced the lever filling system, Sheaffer was the first widely U.S. successful manufacturer to use celluloid, Sheaffer was known for its quality and invented the concept of a lifetime warranty (and in so doing gave Parker fits), Sheaffer was a multinational company by the mid-1920s and was by then selling pens at a faster rate than Conklin ever managed. The consensus among the experienced collectors of my acquaintance (which includes Andy Lambrou and Stuart Schneider as well as others of equal stature if not equal publishing credentials) is that the Big Four were Parker=, Waterman, Sheaffer, and Conklin until about 1927 when Wahl-Eversharp displaced Conklin.

sig.jpg.2d63a57b2eed52a0310c0428310c3731.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as pen connoisseurs wouldn't like to admit Wearever was the largest fountain pen manufacturer in the world by the 1950s making tens of millions of pens each year easily surpassing the production of Parker or Sheaffer.

But by the mid-'60s, Esterbrook was making more pens in seven plants worldwide: 600,000 per DAY. That's 6,000,000 pens every two weeks. Put that in your David Kahn and smoke it. :P

sig.jpg.2d63a57b2eed52a0310c0428310c3731.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you speak of the big four in fountain pens in the United States, it generally refers to the golden age which could arguably be at about same time as the decline of hard rubber pens. That was the mid twenties through the forties. That was the time Conklin was in decline and also about the time the Wahl Evershsarp company began aggressively marketing fountains pens. By then they had introduced the rollerball clip, desk pens with tapers, Gold Seal Insignia and Art Deco style pens and probably some of the most beautiful plastics. In my opinion, Conklin was never part of the big four during the golden age of fountain pens. It is generally acknowledged that Sheaffer, Parker, Waterman and Wahl-Eversharp were the classic big four in fountain pen. Before then and after then other companies held some degree of prominence but those are the four of which are meant when Big Four is mentioned in respect to that historical era.

 

Boston Fountain Pen Company introduced the roller ball clip. They were later purchased by Wahl. Sheaffer introduced the desk pen with Wahl and Parker close behind. These three formed the Pen Desk Set Company to pool patents and control the desk set market with Wahl the obvious junior partner of the other two. Wahl is very interesting in that they are the last company in the big four and the first out with a run from 1917-1957 (I think it is '57) so a mere 40 years in pens (Wahl was founded earlier selling primarily a add on adding machine for the Remington typewriter but, they also made brake parts).

 

Roger W.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read a website that said Waterman was part of the original "Big 4" fountain pen companies in the United States, but the site didn't mention who the other "Big 3" companies were. Who were the other 3 and who was the biggest of the 4 and who was the smallest? I guess it would go by market share- who had the largest slice of the pie and who had the smallest say during the golden age of American Fountain pen companies.

 

The original big 4 were: Waterman, Parker, Sheaffer and Conklin. Conklin declined through the 1920's and by 1930 Whal Eversharpe had supplanted Conklin on the Big 4 list.

 

NOTE: I got this information from Richard Binder's article in the April 2011 issue of Pen World.

 

I don't see how Sheaffer could be considered a part of the 'big 4" along with Conklin. Sheaffer did not become a large company until around 1926. They incorporated as a pen company in 1913 but reached the status of a large pen company with the introduction of Radite (Pyroxylin) as a fountain pen material. That corresponds with the era of Conklins decline and Eversharp's emergence. Waterman, Parker and Conklin were big companies in the early part of that century but the big four were the largest pen makers during the latter part of the 20's through the early part of the 50's. Waterman was declining by then.

 

Sheaffer's sales surpassed Parker in 1921 but, both lagged Wahl's gross sales which were based on more than pens. All three were roughly on par by 1926 with the fourth, Waterman, lagging considerably behind. Another interesting fact about the big four is beyond them, only one other company was ever publicly listed in the 1920's and that was Ingersoll in 1926 and 1927.

 

Also, Radite was introduced in 1924 predating Pyroxylin by two years both of which were proprietary names for Celluloid Nitrate.

 

Roger W.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point is that it is quite a novel thing to say that Conklin was one of the big four for the purposes of answering the original posters question about who they were. During what is considered the 'golden age' of fountain pens, the classic big four did not include Conklin. Putting Conklin in with three others as the big four requires a caveat that it wasn't during the time frame usually thought about when discussing that subject.

And the end of all our exploring

Will be to arrive where we started

And know the place for the first time. TS Eliot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33494
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26624
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...