Jump to content

Wearever Pennant Review


JonB55198

Recommended Posts

Hi Group,

 

If you haven't my original post, please see here: https://www.fountainpennetwork.com/forum/index.php?/topic/188488-one-red-fountain-pen/page__p__1903771__fromsearch__1#entry1903771. The premise is that I will be making a series of up-trades starting with a Red Wing Sung 322. My plan is to get to my current Grail Pen: the Pelikan M1000 Green Striated with Double-Broad or Cursive Italic Broad nib.

 

Well, I made my 2nd trade and Kris was kind enough to trade me two pens. I traded my Airmail 69TS for a Wearever Pennant and a Stypen UP! So, as promised in my original "deal" with the FPN, I'm going to review each pen that I receive in trade along the way. This review will be for the Wearever Pennant and I will review the other pen shortly.

 

Wearever Pennant Review:

Appearance & Design (6/10) – I really like the appearance of this pen...from the outside. The high gloss gold cap and the high gloss black resin barrel and section look very nice. Shortcomings are the plain looking chrome cap which lacks any design at all and the plain looking filler bar. Once you open up the pen you will see what is probably the ugliest nib you have ever seen. There is very little ornamentation about this nib and the shield over the slit makes the appearance worse. The clear feed is really cool and you can see the ink making its way down to the nib.

 

Construction & Quality (7/10) – The pen has a good weight to it that conveys a sense of quality. However, the model I had been given had a loose clip which I was unable to tighten. This may be a weak point of the pen that may fail often. I'm not sure. I have heard though that the J-bars break quite often on these as well and are unreliable. Obviously the sac has a finite life as well.

 

Weight & Dimensions (6/10) – As stated before, this pen has a decent weight for its size. I like a pen to have a higher density than a disposable. I like to be reminded that I am writing with something special. At 6.25" posted, it has a good size and feel to it. The balance isn't bad either and I had no trouble writing with it while taking notes in a 3 hour class. But, the cap is a bit heavier than the barrel so it is not perfect. The pen is not too thin as to be uncomfortable.

 

Nib & Performance (7/10) – The pen filled right up with ease. At first it skipped a little. But after a while this was remedied. After letting it sit for a few days, it started up with about 5 strokes. That was not as impressive as my Pelikan M200. But for the price of this pen, I felt this was reliable enough. The nib lays down a nice wet medium-fine line. My only problem with the nib is that if it is held at just the wrong angle, it feels a bit scratchy on the paper. One of the coolest things about the performance was the thread pitch of the cap. It is coarse enough to be able to deploy quickly with just 3/4 of a turn. I like this better than the pens where you have to turn the cap a few times to get it off.

 

Filling System & Maintenance (7/10) - I liked the way the pen filled. It seemed to take up alot of ink with each lift of the filler lever. During the couple of weeks that I used the pen, it didn't leak or drip into the cap at all. I have heard that the J-bars break easily and often though. I never had to perform maintenance no this filling system, so I'm goign to give it a 7 of 10.

 

Cost & Value (9/10) – In NOS in box condition these go for $30. I can imagine a used one without box like mine might be worth $15. After all, even though this pen is from the 50s and onward, millions were made. For $15, this is probably the highest quality pen I have in that price range. It is certainly the only lever filler I have for that price. Therefore, this pen scores high on the value rating.

 

Conclusion (42/60 = 70%) - If you like lever fillers and want one for short money, try to find one of these pens. They are pretty easily found since they were produced in large volumes. If you like screw caps, you will like this cap. If you like a medium sized pen about the size of a Pelikan 120, then you will like this pen. If you like a pen that will dazzle people with looks, you will not like this pen. If you like a reliable writer that you can carry with you out of the office with some old-school nostalgia to it, you will like this pen.

 

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5310/5613636310_c109083b72_b.jpg

 

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5061/5613020901_ee4507f004_b.jpg

 

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5141/5613020899_429f46a333_b.jpg

 

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5308/5613020897_304456470a_b.jpg

WTT: Conklin Nozac Cursive Italic & Edison Beaumont Broad for Pelikan M1000 or Something Cool (PM me to discuss. It's part of my One Red Fountain Pen trading post)

WTB: 1. Camlin SD

2. 1950s to early 1960s 1st Gen MB 149 with BB nib

3. Airmail 90T Teal Swirl

4. PenBBS 355-16SF Demonstrator

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • JonB55198

    1

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33559
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26746
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...