Jump to content

The Fountain Pen Network uses (functional) cookies. Read the FPN Privacy Policy for more info.  To remove this message, please click here to accept the use of cookies


Registration on the Fountain Pen Network

Dearest Visitor of the little Fountain Pen Nut house on the digital prairie,

Due to the enormous influx of spammers, it is no longer possible to handle valditions in the traditional way. For registrations we therefore kindly and respectfully request you to send an email with your request to our especially created email address. This email address is register at fountainpennetwork dot com. Please include your desired user name, and after validation we will send you a return email containing the validation key, normally wiithin a week.

Thank you very much in advance!
The FPN Admin Team






Photo

Pilot Murex


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Bruno_Taut

Bruno_Taut

    Searching, searching...

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 211 posts
  • Location:In exile, always in exile.
  • Flag:

Posted 14 July 2010 - 16:19

Pen review. Pilot Murex (MR, model MR-500SS)

1. Introduction. General impression. (8.5/10)
After the success of the all steel pocket pen Myu-701, Pilot decided to create a full sized pen in the same fashion with the goal of comfort in mind. Such is the Pilot Murex, in production between 1977 and 1983.

This is a well known pen that follows the trend initiated by Parker with the short lived Parker T-1. Interestingly enough, Parker followed up this idea in 1978 with the model Falcon 50—this time in steel instead of in titanium.

So, this Pilot Murex is an all–steel pen with the nib perfectly integrated in the grip section—they are the same piece of metal. The only contrasting elements in the pen are the black plastic feed and the black accents on the clip.

It is unavoidable to compare this pen to its immediate predecessor the Myu-701. The Murex lacks the overall cleanliness of lines and shows many more rough angles.

Posted Image
2. Design. (8.5/10)
This is a well made pen. It has a number of details that make it comfortable in the hand. The gripping section, for instance, has some grooves to reduce the slippery feeling of stainless steel. The cap attaches firmly to the section with a set of spring-loaded protrusions inserted in the section. Posted, the cap and the barrel fit tightly, making the set comfortable to write.

Posted Image
The spring-loaded protrusions inserted in the section to attach the cap when the pen is closed. The gripping grooves are also visible.

The black accented clip. It is loaded with a spring.

The clip is probably the least appealing feature on this pen. Very square, it looks like it had just been glued to the cap, with little if any intention to integrate both elements smoothly. Quite a paradox in a pen where nib and section show the ultimate integration. Anyway, the clip is not totally awful and this design allows to be spring loaded.


3. Design, size, weight. (7.5/10)
Despite being an all metal pen, it does not feel heavy. Its 21 grams are correctly balanced and writing is comfortable either posted or unposted. Perhaps it is marginally better unposted.

Size-wise, there is not much to add. This pen is average in size. Its only problem might be on its diameter—thicker would make it more comfortable to write.

These are the physical dimensions:
Diameter: 10.5 mm.
Length capped: 132 mm.
Length uncapped: 117 mm.
Length posted: 142 mm.
Weight: 21 g.


4. Nib writing and performance. (8.0/10)
This pen has a stainless steel F nib. Few examples of this pen can be seen with and M nib.

This is a smooth, albeit dry, nib to write with. And being as rigid as a nail, not much ink flow is needed. No line variation at all, of course.

All in all, a pleasant, if boring, writer.
Posted Image

5. Filling system. (8.5/10)
Being Pilot, both proprietary cartridges and converters can be used. Only the CON-20, aerometric, fits in. This converter does not allow checking the remaining ink in the pen.

As an all metal pen, this pen is not suitable for conversion into an eye-dropper.


6. Cost and value. (6.0/10)
The Murex pen, as well as its older cousin the Myu-701, is becoming popular and basic market laws are making both of them quite expensive.

The appeal of this pen lies mainly on the looks. Therefore, the question of how much is worth becomes very personal. The nib, nice as it is, is nothing special—just a smooth rigid nail with correct ink flow.

All in all, I give this pen low marks on this section based not on the performance and looks –I do like this pen— but on the present price.


7. Conclusion. (47/60 = 78/100)
This is a correct pen with a very nice design. It performs very well but without much excitement or character.

The lower scores come in the actual value given the current market conditions, which is alien to the pen or to the manufacturer.

More pics, here.
Bruno_Taut

The contents and pictures of this post belong to the author, here identified as Bruno_Taut or Iosepus

Crónicas Estilográficas: http://estilofilos.blogspot.com/

Sponsored Content

#2 777

777

    Donor Pen

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,021 posts
  • Location:Big Sandy, Tennessee
  • Flag:

Posted 14 July 2010 - 17:09

Thanks for the nice review! I think I like the looks of the original MYU-701 better but this pen is still a nice looking pen. How much ink does it hold?

Regards,
777

Need a pen repaired or a nib re-ground? I'd love to help you out.


Posted Image


Colossians 3:17 - And whatever you do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through Him.


#3 Namo

Namo

    Antique

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,460 posts

Posted 14 July 2010 - 19:12

Excellent review. I sold my beloved Murex - too thin for me and money was needed for another pen -, but it is IMHO one of the most beautiful pen ever produced, and I personnaly like it better than the 701. The nib is amazing, equal to the best I ever tried. I don't like stiff nibs, but this does not mean I cannot recognize the fantastic quality of what Pilot achived there!

amonjak.com

cropped-amonjak-partie-4-de-4_page_4-modifiee1.jpg  

free 70 pages graphic novel. Enjoy!


#4 Bruno_Taut

Bruno_Taut

    Searching, searching...

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 211 posts
  • Location:In exile, always in exile.
  • Flag:

Posted 20 July 2010 - 15:17

According to some figures published in here --FPN--, the converter CON-20 holds 0.8 ml, and the Pilot cartridge, 1.1 ml.

And I agree--I like the Myu 701 better.

Hope this helps.

Cheers,

Iosepues


Thanks for the nice review! I think I like the looks of the original MYU-701 better but this pen is still a nice looking pen. How much ink does it hold?

Regards,
777


Bruno_Taut

The contents and pictures of this post belong to the author, here identified as Bruno_Taut or Iosepus

Crónicas Estilográficas: http://estilofilos.blogspot.com/

#5 LYTH

LYTH

    L2K LOVER

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 163 posts
  • Location:Brittany, Californistère
  • Flag:

Posted 12 October 2014 - 19:24

I have owned a MYU 701 but it was too slippery for me, tought the design is terrific.

Waiting for Murex now. Will see if it's more convenient for me.


LYTH
Posted Image

#6 DylanKeefe

DylanKeefe

    Near Mint

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPip
  • 38 posts
  • Flag:

Posted 13 October 2014 - 23:16

Thanks for the review! I agree, the pen looks cool, but it seems a bit too overrated on the market right now. If I do get one, it will be in the future, when the market dies down.



#7 dex248

dex248

    NOS (New Old Stock)

  • Member - Silver

  • PipPip
  • 12 posts

Posted 14 October 2014 - 01:31

I have this pen and love it. In fact, it is my daily writer. My only regret is that I had another but sold it.






Sponsored Content




|