Jump to content

21, The Fasces & The Swastika,


rhr

Recommended Posts

Don't worry, both of these trademarks were from a period well before these symbols took on their more sinister connotations and became stigmatized. It's like the co-opting of the word "gay". You can't use the word to merely mean happy any more, not without a lot of bracketed explanation, or footnoting. All the other uses of these words and symbols have been severely curtailed to historic mention rather than use. Trademark no. 21,916, E. R. Oettinger & Co., "Steel And Other Pens", Nov 1, 1892, used since Mar 1, 1889, is for an image of the seated female figure Lady Liberty holding a fasces in one hand and the tiller of a rudder in the other. Trademark no. 52,888, Payot, Upham & Co., "Steel Pens", May 22, 1906, used since May 8, 1905, is for an image of a scimitar and a swastika. There are also the Parker #52 and #53 fountain pens with either sterling-silver, or gold-filled swastika overlays that were first advertised in Parker's in-house magazine Side Talks in January 1910.

 

George Kovalenko.

 

:ninja:

 

If you want to perform the trademark searches, simply cut and paste, or type the trademark numbers into the search window in the Trademark Document Retrieval Portlet.

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • rhr

    3

  • mandarintje

    2

  • Sertorius

    2

  • encremental

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

crickets. Maybe it is the "favorite" part. No comment.

"... for even though the multitude may be utterly deceived, subsequently it usually hates those who have led it to do anything improper." Aristotle, Athenian Constitution, XXVIII:3 Loeb Edition

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right, it's a matter of "favorites". I was torn about marking them as some of my "least favorites", the same as I did with the type-writer segment in this series, but these precede the later, tainted uses of these symbols. It's also a matter of mention, not use.

 

George Kovalenko.

 

:ninja:

Edited by rhr

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahem .... I wouldn't say the word gay had sinister connotations, was stigmatised or was anything like the swastika. Seriously. Some of us are a bit sensitive about stuff like that. Consider this a footnote.

 

John

Edited by encremental
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I knew that it was going to be a sensitive issue, and that it was a problematic pairing of examples, but I didn't mean to say that the word "gay" had sinister connotations, or was stigmatized, or anything like that. I only meant to say, and this is the only similarity, that it's one of those words that's been co-opted for another use, and can't be used for its original meaning without a lot of tagged-on explanation, which is what we're doing now. The new use of the word has almost completely displaced the old usage.

 

Footnote added. ;~)

 

George Kovalenko.

 

:ninja:

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not so long ago on UK TV, there was an old man and his wife talking about some kind of construction in their town. "it's a magnificent erection" said the old man. His wife realised the modern association and her eyes twinkled at the thought =)))) it was so funny!

 

For me the Swastika has a different association because half my family is from India.

Gay for me only has a positive association either way!

 

It's like the word in Dutch for happy and lucky are the one and the same. Gelukkig. How do you say I'm happy to be lucky then? or I'm lucky to be happy. Mind bending.

you can never get it wrong, because you can never get it done!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in Dutch it isn't the same, we do have different words for happy and lucky, happy = vrolijk, and lucky = gelukkig.

Edited by Gub
Link to comment
Share on other sites

in Dutch it isn't the same, we do have different words for happy and lucky, happy = vrolijk, and lucky = gelukkig.

ah but can't you say "ik ben gelukkig dat u..."

I am happy that you....

and "het is gelukkig dat" it is lucky that....

 

Vrolijk I forgot about though =)

I associate it with frolick!

you can never get it wrong, because you can never get it done!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 years later...

post-133976-0-47368200-1484568407.jpgThis is my first post, I've been watching in the wings for a while and like the tone of this forum.

 

I wonder if the collective wisdom of the FPN community could guide me on this one. I was looking for a French nib and found this (attached) which I purchased and which certainly looks French.

 

Did a French brand of pen have this fasces symbol on the nib? Or was it the symbol of a nib maker rather than a pen maker? From which period is it?

 

Any light that could be shed on this obscurity would be much appreciated.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26772
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...