Jump to content

Montblanc 146 - the icon that one can't overlook


dandelion

Recommended Posts

http://lh5.ggpht.com/_FODBn3j5KLc/SskfCFfzVMI/AAAAAAAARhc/9MF0fCHyN4A/Kyrksession_0127.JPG

 

Intro

This Montblanc 146 was made in the 1980s. It has a single tone, 14 k, gold nib that originally was an extra fine nib, but I had it customized into a cursive italic by the FPN member Oxonian, who I really recommend. The ink window is light grey-blue instead of the big, clear square shaped (or striped - depending how one sees it) ink windows of the contemporary 146. I actually didn't intend to write a review of the Montblanc 146. My idea was to take a few photos of it and then sell it. I've bought too many pens lately and am having a hard time choosing which pens that have to go and I thought that a MB 146 is more easy to replace than the other candidates. What was intended as a short photo session taking a few photos instead made me realize that I probably can't let go of this pen and I also started to browse through the bunch of photos I've taken of it during the time I've had it - of which some are posted here - an eclectic mix from different sessions. It is generic and less "original" than many of my other pens. Black/gold and very traditional design is not my usual preference, but there is something about it that makes it very hard to let it go. I've thus postponed the decision.

 

Design 10/10 (objective) 8/10 (subjective)

http://lh3.ggpht.com/_FODBn3j5KLc/S5j2_PAOf2I/AAAAAAAARrg/nz9lmhphWSc/mb%20146%20filo%20V.jpg

 

Some people would disagree when I call this - and the whole Meisterstück series - iconic and instead claim that it is the Montblanc 149 - the corpulent cigar - that is the icon. For me all of the more or less fat, cigar shaped fountain pens - 144, 145, 146, 147 (despite its cartridge filling system) and 149 - in the traditional black/gold Meisterstück series are icons . This series is by many people - far beyond the fountain pen community - seen as the ultimate, first class, fountain pen. There is no other pen model with as many knock offs and copies, and there are only a few pen makers that don't have their own cigar shaped, high brow pen - more or less obviously inspired by the Meisterstück. Especially among non-German pen makers, it almost seems mandatory to have at least one pen in the higher price ranges that is modelled upon the Meisterstück - just look at Sailor, Pilot and Platignum.

http://lh5.ggpht.com/_FODBn3j5KLc/S5j2PP-Y8tI/AAAAAAAARpM/UqvCepSUOI0/mb%20146%20r%C3%B6d%20II.jpg

 

Since the design has become an icon I find it hard to keep a distance to it and rate it. I don't think I have or have had nearly as mixed feelings towards any other pen model as I have towards the classic Meisterstück. It is to some degree personal. The Meisterstück was the first "real" fountain pen that I bought (a 144 when I still lived at my parents in my late teens) . I had wanted it for so long and used some of the money that I had earned by working weekends and parts of the summer vacation. I didn't dare to tell my mother how much I spent on it. I actually bought a used computer at the same time as well and in the long run the Meisterstück kept its value a lot better than the computer - since long sent to the graveyard of electronics. When I sold the 144 I almost got as much as I initially paid for it (if one doesn't count the devaluation). A great part of why I choose a Meisterstück was that it was the classy fountain pen incarnated - the pen. I guess this teenage love for it contributes to my love/hate relationship to the Meisterstück. A part of me see it as an immature, shallow love for an icon - for the pen and all the (PR created) mystique that surrounds it. Another part of me has a sweet spot for this über classic pen - the original - and think that if one shall have one cigarshaped pen in black and gold it must be the real thing - the original. So, there I am - attracted and repelled by the very same features.

 

http://lh6.ggpht.com/_FODBn3j5KLc/S5gYp9JuoZI/AAAAAAAARl0/4wqtbUapRNM/MB%20146%20mars_0056.JPG

 

The iconic thing makes it feel generic and replacable. Icon status in exchange for originality and uniqueness. On the other hand it is precisely the iconic thing - that this is the original - that contributes to its attractiveness. All other pens based on it - even first class pens - are merely knock offs (even if they can be very expensive and well made). The Meisterstück in its modern version - this cigar shaped model created in the 50s - must be one of the most successful and long lived brandings one can find. Based on the success, the iconic status and timelessness it would be unfair to give less than maximum points design wise.

 

On the other hand - it is the original, but lacks originality. Montblanc succeeded in creating a timeless model of the fountain pen. A representative. On these grounds I'd say that it is impossible to give the classic black/gold Meisterstück in its different sizes one single verdict. It is a not only a pen - it is a phenomenon. What I do like about this design is that it is elegant without exaggerated bling, that it is exclusive and understated in a way none of the special versions or LEs or WEs are. Still something of a writing instrument that is made to be used. Sometimes I find it too elegant - a bit stiff and dusty - but it is a timeless design where all elements - barrel, cap and nib - are very well balanced and in harmony with each other. Out of the three standard sizes 144/145 and 146 and 149 I prefer the 146. Its lenght is almost the same as the 149, but it is more slender without being meagre - I find the 144 and 145 a tad to meagre - and it is still thicker than a Pelikan M800.

 

The few ornaments that it carries is very well made - the fat cap band with the Meisterstück inscription is meticulously well made with an air of craftsmanship. That is one of the details that I like in particular. Another thing I prefer with this pen compared with the contemporary version is that the nib is more simple - monotone and not so much bling on it. But, the most beautiful nib version is the one from the 50's with a similar design as this, but in duotone. Simple and yet refined. And - lastly - I am a little fond of the snow flake on the cap.

 

Objective grade : 10/10 - based on its status as THE fountain pen and that the design has survived in over 50 years. It is the original and icon.

Subjective grade: 8/10 I both consider the iconic status, the understaded stylishness, but add my own ambivalence and that the cigar shape is not my favourite shape. The contemporary would have a point knocked off becuase of the clumsy nib, but here I am rating my own, older version. But this is a good grade as well.

 

Function & Writing Experience 8/10

Despite being a design icon - this is a pen and should thus be of superior quality with regard to its reputation and price. Itis - doubtlessly - a well built pen. But it is not extraordinary. It is very comfortable to write with - the gripping section is designed for writing and it doesn't have any step bewteen barrel and gripping section, which makes it suitable to many. It posts very well and secure, which I find very important since I prefer posting my pens. The cap unscrews a little bit to easily, though, and should not be carried clipped to a pocket. In all it is one of the most comfortable writers I've used. With the flaws weighed in: 8/10 - a very good grade.

 

http://lh3.ggpht.com/_FODBn3j5KLc/S5kKVlErSPI/AAAAAAAARtk/Y5LSJe30Q5Q/wik%20II_0057.JPG

 

 

Filling system 7/10

The Montblanc 146 sports - of course - a traditional piston filler. The piston moves easily and it is - as all well functioning pistons - easy to fill and flush. One drawback with it is that, out of the two 146 I've had, one developed a leak from the piston knob (a rather new pen) and I had to send it for repair. I've read in the MB forum at FPN that there are others who have had this problem with both the MB 146 and the MB 149, so it might be a construction weakness. I've owned and used several piston fillers and actually never had any problems with a leaking piston knob before - this is the first one. As with the cap that easily unscrews - this is something that shouldn't be common among pens with this reputation and at this price level. This one functions as it should, though, and when it functions it has a great ink capacity and is easy and nice to use. 7/10 - based on the problems I've experience with ink behind the piston with this model. When it works (like this pen) it gets 10/10, but I wanted to weigh in the potential problem here.

 

http://lh5.ggpht.com/_FODBn3j5KLc/S5kKo_ZsTDI/AAAAAAAARts/DSSUjmKo0ns/Lamy%2027_0213.JPG

 

Nib 7.5/10

As stated above: I definitely prefer this monotone nib to the contemporary more blingy and clumsy duotone. The contemporary nib in one of the photos is a MB 146 with a M size nib that I had for a while before I bought this. But, the most beautiful of the MB 146 nibs are, in my (not so humble opinion) the ones from the fifties- a sleek, elegantly shaped two tone nib. You can view a photo of it here and I can warmly recommend www.fountainpen.de for Montblanc references and photos.

 

http://lh5.ggpht.com/_FODBn3j5KLc/S5gUFFb4o5I/AAAAAAAARks/jbLolFSVNK0/mb%20146%20visconti_0010.JPG http://lh3.ggpht.com/_FODBn3j5KLc/S5j_6omQjLI/AAAAAAAARrY/5KTm3alfqYY/MB%20146%20mars%20spets%20II.jpg

 

Anyhow - aesthetics aside - the nib I have on my 146 is customized by the FPN member Oxonian. It originally was an extra fine nib - that put down a rather thick line so I had it customized into a lovely narrow italic (see writing samples) with a width of about 0.4 mm. My experience with original, untampered, Montblanc nibs are that they are generally very pleasant to write with and that the broader nib widths often show some line variation. I shouldn't call this nib flexible, but it has a little hint of spring that adds character to the writing. One thing that all the MBs I've tried have in common is that they seem to run wide. In all very good and well made nibs. It is a pity that MB doesn't offer a broader range of nib sizes, though. I'd love factory made stubs and italics. If I were to rate the original nib I'd give it around 7.5/10, and if I am to rate this customized nib I'd give it 9/10. The parsimonious grade for the original is due to the fact that I wanted to customize it and that I didn't find it smooth enough. A good nib, but not excellent. To rate the customized nib becomes a bit off, since I am not rating the MB nib, but I warmly recommend Oxonian - a pleasure to deal with.

 

http://lh6.ggpht.com/_FODBn3j5KLc/S5j3-DPhHzI/AAAAAAAARqU/uEAQq-c2u44/mb%20146%20filo%20X.jpg

 

In all 31.5/40 ~7.9/10

As stated in the title - the Meisterstück 146 is a model that is almost impossible to neglect. Even if you don't like it you have an opinion of it. I think my ambivalence is a rather good illustration of this position. The negative pole partly stems from its über classic design and partly from the transformation MB has went through the last decades - from being a pen manufacturer with quality pens in different price ranges, like Pelikan, to a luxury brandputting its label on a lot of different products - where pens are sold more as accessoires and status symbols than pens. They still have something special, though, but I am not convinced that a new MB is worth the premium price, but a used one in good condition can often be had for a lot less. But I am more and more feeling that vintage Montblancs are more interesting than the contemporary Montblancs. If I would have a little trunk of money to spend on a MB I'd spend it on a 139 in good condition and use it every day...

 

I've previously published this review on my blog. The text is the same (except that I've added grades to conform to the guidelines here), but I've changed some of the photos. So, if you'd like to see more/other photos you can visit a post on my blog here.

 

http://lh3.ggpht.com/_FODBn3j5KLc/S5j15Jau3eI/AAAAAAAARo8/NsLsUEL9YVo/DSC08819.JPG

Edited by dandelion

*****the dandelion blog is right here*****

*****the dandelion flickr is right here*****

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • dandelion

    3

  • hari317

    2

  • Brian

    2

  • PinarelloOnly

    1

"So, there I am - attracted and repelled by the very same features."

Exactly the same way I ve always felt about almost all MBs and why I generally end up buying pelikans while wistfully looking at the MB in the next shelf.

Great review, almost felt you wrote my mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for a great review full of experiences and some interesting observations. The predecessor of the MB torpedo would be the Sheaffer Balance. That design, when first introduced was groundbreaking in its departure from the flat top.

 

This model 146 is a great design and actually is different from the current offerings. Try holding the current 146 next to this older model and you will see this.

 

BTW, I would probably be in the minority to wish that MB would revise the present design of the 144 (now called something else?) so that it too could benefit from an integrated piston filler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice review.

I had to sacrefice twice my 146, I sure miss it but I take comfort with its bigger sibling the 149.

 

Thank you for sharing your impression of the pen and I love your pictures.

Respect to all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recently sold my 1977 146 to a fellow FPNer - great nib, but I just had moved beyond feeling comfortable with even this much "bling" of a pen. I am much happier using a Parker 51, old Aurora 88 or Lamy 2000, among others. But it did have a very sweet nib, I must say. I am not a fan of MB LEs and all of the pens that are $500 and up. But the 146/149 is a pen that has definitely stood the test of time, and it really is an individual choice, what one likes and doesn't like. For me, at age 20, the 146 was an amazing pen to own, particularly at a price of $90...

<i>"Most people go through life using up half their energy trying to protect a dignity they never had."</i><br>-Marlowe, in <i>The Long Goodbye</i>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thankyou for the nice & thoughtful review.

It's nice to see someone admitting to slightly ambivilent feelings over an expensive pen. I've never had a pen where there hasn't been a 'but...' in my feelings toward it, yet many reviews of high end pens are wholly positive, something I find hard to believe from my own experience.

 

Regards,

 

Richard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent review of this iconic pen, thanks.

And how can this be, because he is the Kwisatz Haderach.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice review, your review mirrors many emotions that I associate with the Meisterstuck line and amazing photography.

 

I believe your pen is earlier than 80s, from the square feeder case lip and 14C marking on the nib, I would think this will be from the early production of the resin 146s in the 70s.

In case you wish to write to me, pls use ONLY email by clicking here. I do not check PMs. Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really superb review. Makes me want to get one.

With the new FPN rules, now I REALLY don't know what to put in my signature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lovely review of a lovely pen.

the photos are lovely and certainly do justice to the pen and your ambivalence.

 

I agree with Hari about this most likely being a 1970's 146 and have a pen quite similar to this myself. It is outstanding and alongside Hari's 149 I recently purchased this pen sits most proudly.

I don't know if I will always keep my 146 but if I move it on, it will be for an even better replacement!

 

Fountain pens have not really improved much overall in design or function ( in my very humble opinion) since this pen was introduced.

________________________________________________________________________________

 

Love and work... work and love, that's all there is.

Sigmund Freud

 

(there was a man who obviously never knew fountain pens!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for overwhelming positive response! blush.gif

 

"So, there I am - attracted and repelled by the very same features."

Exactly the same way I ve always felt about almost all MBs and why I generally end up buying pelikans while wistfully looking at the MB in the next shelf.

Great review, almost felt you wrote my mind.

 

Happy to hear that someone else has this strange relation to MBs. I must admit that while I basically like Pelikans I seem to end up buying Stipulas and other Italians...and a Pilot or three. :)

 

 

Thankyou for the nice & thoughtful review.

It's nice to see someone admitting to slightly ambivilent feelings over an expensive pen. I've never had a pen where there hasn't been a 'but...' in my feelings toward it, yet many reviews of high end pens are wholly positive, something I find hard to believe from my own experience.

 

Regards,

 

Richard.

 

Thanks - I almost always have ambivalent feelings towards expensive pens - and I demand quite a lot more of an expensive pen than a cheaper pen. If a pen costs a lot of money it shall work flawlessly. I don't believe that a $500 is ten times better than a $50 pen, but such an expensive pen doesn't have the privilege of being allowed quality flaws.

 

Nice review, your review mirrors many emotions that I associate with the Meisterstuck line and amazing photography.

 

I believe your pen is earlier than 80s, from the square feeder case lip and 14C marking on the nib, I would think this will be from the early production of the resin 146s in the 70s.

 

 

Thanks for the kind words and for the help to date my pen - I am so impressed by this kind of skill. Did they make 146s in the 70's? I didn't think they made 146s in the 70's.

 

A lovely review of a lovely pen.

the photos are lovely and certainly do justice to the pen and your ambivalence.

 

I agree with Hari about this most likely being a 1970's 146 and have a pen quite similar to this myself. It is outstanding and alongside Hari's 149 I recently purchased this pen sits most proudly.

I don't know if I will always keep my 146 but if I move it on, it will be for an even better replacement!

 

Fountain pens have not really improved much overall in design or function ( in my very humble opinion) since this pen was introduced.

 

Thanks and for confirming Hari's estimation on when it was made.

*****the dandelion blog is right here*****

*****the dandelion flickr is right here*****

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dandelion, thanks for a thoughtful and critical review. It's made me reconsider the Montblanc brand in general and the 146 in particular. Wonderful job with the review.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the kind words and for the help to date my pen - I am so impressed by this kind of skill. Did they make 146s in the 70's? I didn't think they made 146s in the 70's.

 

IIRC, the 146 production was halted in the 60's decade. Enjoy your pen!

 

Regards,

Hari

In case you wish to write to me, pls use ONLY email by clicking here. I do not check PMs. Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33558
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26730
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...