Jump to content

The Fountain Pen Network uses (functional) cookies. Read the FPN Privacy Policy for more info.  To remove this message, please click here to accept the use of cookies


Registration on the Fountain Pen Network

Dearest Visitor of the little Fountain Pen Nut house on the digital prairie,

Due to the enormous influx of spammers, it is no longer possible to handle valditions in the traditional way. For registrations we therefore kindly and respectfully request you to send an email with your request to our especially created email address. This email address is register at fountainpennetwork dot com. Please include your desired user name, and after validation we will send you a return email containing the validation key, normally wiithin a week.

Thank you very much in advance!
The FPN Admin Team






Photo

Comparison:: Vintage Student Pens


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Pfhorrest

Pfhorrest

    Collectors Item

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,147 posts
  • Location:Texas

Posted 28 December 2009 - 07:28

Posted Image

Both of these great pens are regular ones in my rotations. They are vintage models from two of the most famous pen companies in the world. I decided to do a comparison review to address each of the pen's shortcomings (only in relation to each other, of course).

Quick facts:

Parker 21:
Nib: Hooded "octanium" steel nib, Extra Fine
Body: Plastic
Cap: Stainless Steel
Filling system: Aerometric
Cost: $20

Pelikan Mk. 10:
Nib: Partially hooded gold-plated steel nib, Oblique Fine
Body: Resin
Cap: Resin
Filling system: Piston
Cost: $20

Appearance and Design:

Parker: 9/10
Pelikan: 9/10

The Parker's timeless (according to some) design is elegant, functional, and simple - a rare combination. The stainless cap (Lustraloy) contrasts well with the dark black plastic.

The Pelikan's design seems a bit more modern, with slightly angular ends and an oddly-shaped clip. Brass furniture is a nice touch on a pen designated for the student market, and the resin has a depth unmatched by that of the Parker's plastic.

The two pens are tied in appearance as far as I'm concerned - it's very hard to choose a pen that trumps the other in this category.

Construction and Quality:

Parker: 9/10
Pelikan: 7/10

The Parker is nearly perfect as far as construction is concerned - the hooded nib is perfectly aligned, finish is suprisingly good for a lower-market pen that the Parker 21 was, and the stainless cap has no dents or scratches. All threaded parts come together flawlessly.

The Pelikan's piston is superb - extremely smooth, suprising for a vintage pen. The polish on the resin is perfect - there are no rough spots or uneven surfaces anywhere. However, there is quite a bit of play in the clip and the cap and barrel interface when the pen is capped. Although there has been no side effects of this, it's a bit dissapointing.

Parker is the winner!

Posted Image

Weight and Dimentions:

Parker: 6/10
Pelikan: 7/10

The Parker lacks a bit in the ergonomics department - it's uncomfortable unless I hold it in a strange position. The nib is a bit too small for comfort, and it's way too light, almost feather-weight.

The Pelikan is much better, with a more open nib and more space to grip the section - it fits better in my hand than the Parker, although it too is a bit small.

Pelikan is the winner!

Posted Image

Nib and Performance:

Parker: 8/10
Pelikan: 9/10

This was a close call. The Parker extrafine is very smooth and glides across the page, with a suprisingly large sweet spot for an extrafine. The Pelikan nib is an Oblique Fine, an uncommon size (as I assume) that is also very smooth and with a large sweet spot. However, I must give the Pelikan the upper hand, since the steel nib actually does have a bit of flex! It's not as much, as, say, a Lamy semi-flex 14k nib, but it is there and it is very pleasant.

Pelikan is the winner!

Posted Image

Filling System:

Parker: 9/10
Pelikan: 8/10

As much as I like piston and cartridge pens, the Parker's aerometric system is very nice. A few quick squeezes of the bar, and the pen is ready to go. This is very useful for times when I don't want to fiddle with pistons and clean up the accompanying mess. The Pelikan piston is very smooth and holds quite a bit of ink, more than the Parker.

Parker is the winner!

Cost and value:

Parker: 10/10
Pelikan: 10/10

There's not much to say here. Two excellent vintage pens that could be had for the fraction of the cost of a comparable modern one. I applaud both Parker and Pelikan for designing these pens.

Although the final score has a difference by 7, I tie both pens since they are such great writers. Not faultless, but the benefits far outweigh any little quirks.

Thank you for reading.

Posted Image
The sword is mightier than the pen. However, swords are now obsolete whereas pens are not.

-Unknown

Sponsored Content

#2 spot

spot

    Rare

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 153 posts

Posted 28 December 2009 - 17:38

nice review!
I have two '21' myself. I am currently using one and it is a great writer. Maybe small and lacks the 'royal presence' of the Parker "51", but it has still the timeless look of its big brother. I will sell them both soon, I have 4 great pens in use already and the Parker 21's are left unused.
"To remember what needs to be remembered is the secret of success" Nisargadatta Maharaj

#3 streeton

streeton

    UpsideDown

  • Member - Gold

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 445 posts
  • Location:Sydney, Australia
  • Flag:

Posted 02 January 2010 - 06:56

Phorrest, thanks for a great review. I noticed a Charcoal Safari in your photo - I have one inked with Noodlers burgundy with the 1.1mm nib. This is my best writer - truly superb and I'm wondering how your charcoal safari compares with the two you have reviewed.






Sponsored Content




|