QUOTE (RevAaron @ Sep 11 2008, 09:47 AM)

I bought one of these from speerbob, somewhat as impulse- I've such a soft spot for these semi-generic German piston fillers. It's an interesting pen. Goes for the Montblancish look, but does it really skinny. I can't help but wonder if it's supposed to make people think you have an MB 146 or something in your pocket, because the clip is disproportionately large for the pen- looked at straight on it takes up more than half the width of the pen.

It even goes for the modern Montblanc looking ink window, small clears windows w/ black stripes breaking it up. Perhaps it's a Fun-house Mirror Montblanc.

If only it was a wee bit thicker! Then I'd like this pen even more. I don't care much about how long a pen is, unlike a lot of folks around here, but I do need a base level of girth. The 1745 falls short by a tiny bit for me, so I can't use it for long periods. As far as dimensions of this pen, look up the dimensions of a Lamy 2000- the Classico is the same length capped, uncapped and posted as my 2000.

The pen, out of the box, is maybe 3-4/10 wetness. Speaking of a wetness scale, where is info on Richard's? I don't know what the benchmarks are, so for me it's compared to other pens I've used. A lot of the pens I use are really wet, which has become an issue taking a class this fall- most of the pens I use are so wet that they have been feathering like mad on the cheap lab notebook issued to me and the photocopies I'm also writing on in class. Driving me nuts. This pen writes on it without feathering and feels smooth- a lot of more expensive pens do very poorly on cheap paper.
The nibs are very easily swappable between the 1745 and the Classico- so if you've had someone tune or grind the 1745's nib, it's easy to unscrew them both and swap. The 1745's nib is smaller, but this pen isn't all that much bigger, so I don't think it'd feel too odd. I tried it for a minute and it felt fine. I prefer the nib of the Classico; the pen I got from Speerbob wrote better out of the box than my 1745 did. The latter required some hamfisted tuning by myself, where the Classico worked well straight out of the cellophane. The Classico's nib has a bit less spring, but to me that's a good thing for how I tend to use cheaper pens- standing up, on the go.
I'm not sure why I've such an interest to try non-first tier brands of German pens, but I do! Next on the list: a Senator Windsor, or a President if I can find a *really* good price on it.
Now that I have this, I won't likely be using my 1745 anytime soon- if anyone wants it for $8 shipped, PM me. Only inked once.
Aaron
Thanks for your comments, Aaron. Like you, I've enjoyed my 1745 -- both the quality, "well-made-ness" of it, as well as the size. I am using mine for writing comments on student papers with Swishmix Glacier Blue. The smaller size helps me keep what I have to say in the margins, leaving room for other comments on the page as well. It's very precise in that regard, I find. The nib sweats out/creeps a little bit of the Noodler's Swishmix, but nothing like the rivers I saw in other pens I tried that ink in. The one I have now is between an M and F, and it works well on many types of paper. I have ordered an Ex. Fine for "tighter spots" on these student papers, and I look forward to using it too. JJBlanche offers a great deal, and his nib tuning service is wonderful as well. These are very good pens, in my experience -- and incredibly reasonable.
My hands are relatively small -- or fine -- or whatever I should call them. In other days, I've done roofing, poured concrete, written poetry and fiction, and everything in between, so they've worked well, but overall "sensitively," I guess. That's one reason why I like the 1745 -- it's hard to find a solid pen that thin and light. The nib floats across the ink, and I can fly on paper -- easily and solidly all at the same time, and the ideas fly easily too, I find, as they follow the flow of the pen. Oddly, as I've been writing more with the 1745, now that school has started, I've found even my M200 feeling a little too thick. I use that for journaling, writing projects, etc. -- and the nib is hard to beat, but I've been missing that thin, light touch -- even thinner and lighter than the M200. So, that's why I'm giving the Classico a shot. When I have a whole sheet of paper in front of me, a longer pen is preferable -- as there's more room to move/"fly." I often switch to the Pilot 78G I bought from Samovar -- also relatively thin, but as nice as that nib is, it doesn't feel as solid/certain to me as the Reform. So lightness, thinness, and a solid feel combined is what I'm hoping for with the Classico. Will see what happens. I don't think I'll ever retire the Pilot or M200 -- but I'm ready at the same time to take a shot at the Classico.
"Everybody's different, " as they say -- or, "That's baseball," as my mother-in-law likes to say. Achhh... the sound of that word still hurts. Was up til after midnight, suffering with the Red Sox. Ouch....
Anyway, I'll write back with some conclusions, once the pen arrives. Thanks again for your post!