QUOTE (Chemyst @ Aug 24 2008, 05:59 PM)

QUOTE (Iridium @ Aug 24 2008, 05:31 PM)

Is this a game of devil's advocate? Fountain pens obsolete? A pen that can refill from an incredibly wide range of bottled inks and write with the lightest touch seems kind of futuristic to me. Why, it's like a pen from another planet!

Being in a niche market does not in any way imply obsolescence for a useful tool.
Not at all. If fountain pens were comparable or better than ballpoints for the majority of applications, you'd see them everywhere. They are not, so you do not.
We may end up having to agree to disagree on this, but popularity does not determine whether any tool is obsolete. There's no question that ballpoints are more convenient for most people, and often popularity and mainstream acceptance can be decided on the basis of convenience alone, for better or worse. This has nothing to do with the other qualities of any type of tool, and over time, people become increasingly ignorant about what they might have sacrificed long ago in the name of convenience, but this still does not imply that any tool is obsolete.
It's hard to think of good analogies, but in a broad sense, let's look at electric motors, which have been around far longer than internal combustion engines. Some early automobiles were based on electric motors, but the new internal combustion engine won out because of convenience (in range and refueling time). Does this make the old electric motor obsolete for personal vehicles? I bet that if and when everybody is driving an electric automobile in the future, they'll think that it's pretty "advanced" and look back and laugh at the clunky cars that chugged along noisily on the streets all those years ago. Would they even realize the irony of such views? Did they ever fully realize what they were missing before electric motors finally made it into the mainstream after having been rejected earlier? For the average person, the answers are no and no. But regardless, the old electric motor has never been obsolete, and neither are fountain pens, regardless of whether they are mainstream, because they still do some things better than their mainstream counterparts.
QUOTE (Chemyst @ Aug 24 2008, 05:59 PM)

Fountain pens suffer from a raft of problems which do not plague ballpoints:
-no industry standard for nib sizes. Your F is my XF is someone else's M.
Well, this new BiC Ultra (that I'm learning to dislike more and more) is listed as a medium but writes like a broad--it isn't even consistent with other BiCs, much less any industry standard. I also have a gel pen (essentially a ballpoint with a different type of ink) with a 0.5 mm ball that writes just like another gel pen's 0.7 mm ball, and yet another 0.7 mm gel pen that writes much broader still (it seems that some companies measure the ball while others measure the line on some representative type of paper).
QUOTE (Chemyst @ Aug 24 2008, 05:59 PM)

-delicate writing surfaces. You don't have to worry when you drop a ballpoint, if it was nib down or not. You also can't push too hard with a ballpoint.
No argument here.
QUOTE (Chemyst @ Aug 24 2008, 05:59 PM)

-messy and inconvenient filling systems. Even you use cartridges exclusively, there is a much greater opportunity to get ink on yourself than with swapping a ballpoint cartridge.
I get more ballpoint ink on myself than fountain pen ink, believe it or not (except when I'm washing pens and playing around with inks, of course). This is because ballpoint ink sometimes forms globs on the page that don't dry out for hours. Maybe I just have strange luck, but I've also had ballpoints leak on me on several occasions. Just a few weeks ago, a disposable advertising Pentel RSVP squirted a bunch of ink onto a multi-part form I was filling out (I had to request a new form).
QUOTE (Chemyst @ Aug 24 2008, 05:59 PM)

-price point. I can make top of the line ballpoint system for under a buck. If you want an equivalent fountain pen (M200 maybe?) you're talking around 40-200X that cost.
Why would anyone need an M200 to compete with a ballpoint? Fountain pens that write just as well can be had for a few bucks.
QUOTE (Chemyst @ Aug 24 2008, 05:59 PM)

-convenience. I can pick up a ballpoint pen from 10 yrs ago and it starts up, maybe it takes a swirl or two on some scrap paper.
I recently threw away a bunch of ballpoints I got eight years ago after trying to get them started, literally tearing through a couple of sheets of paper in the process. Some of them did work, but I think those were probably the ones that started skipping on me later, so they got tossed, too. I have a few very old ones that still work perfectly, but it's the luck of the draw here.
QUOTE (Chemyst @ Aug 24 2008, 05:59 PM)

A fountain pen left untouched for 10 yrs would be full of dried ink.
I had this issue with a fountain pen that I hadn't used since I was a kid. I flushed the dried ink out and popped in a new cartridge--good as new.
QUOTE (Chemyst @ Aug 24 2008, 05:59 PM)

-ease for the average user. The angle and pressure of my writing matters very little with a ballpoint. Considerably more finesse is required to hit the fountain pen "sweet spot".
I won't argue over these technical points or perceived convenience, but then there is the strain that some people have and the calluses that some people get from using ballpoints, which could have been avoided by using fountain pens, as some people have discovered. Such injuries could be considered a form of inconvenience that is nevertheless not blamed on ballpoints due to the ignorance of the average person (I don't mean this in a rude way--we're all ignorant until we learn something new about something old).
QUOTE (Chemyst @ Aug 24 2008, 05:59 PM)

Fountain pens have some advantages. Like you pointed out, you can have pretty much whatever colour you want from whatever pen body you have. You also don't have to press as hard as you do with some ballpoints or rollerballs. You get the intangibles like nostalgia. All of which are obviously nice for a small demographic. However, by and large, the disadvantages far outweigh the advantages for the average person.
Agreed, but the latter does not make fountain pens obsolete technologically. Perhaps we're merely using different semantics and therefore this isn't worth arguing about, because I think we both have valid points, even if we use certain words differently.