emes441
Jul 13 2008, 07:45 PM
I see that there a few different types of Parker 51s- areomatic and vacumatic. Which one is the best (and where is the best place to get a good, reliable one with a fine nib).
pakmanpony
Jul 13 2008, 08:50 PM
Since you are new to 51's I would go with the aero, it is more likely to not need to be refurbished prior to using it. The market place here is a good place to pick up a 51.
Ernst Bitterman
Jul 14 2008, 12:36 PM
The best one is the one you like. Aero is less likely to break down, vac has a vast ink capacity.
MYU
Jul 14 2008, 10:31 PM
I'll also vote "aerometric" as well. That's the one where the whole barrel unscrews to reveal a squeeze bladder encased in a metal sleeve. It is the simplest design--easy to maintain. The vacumatic is the one with the blind cap that unscrews and reveals a "T" stick that you press down. It's an interesting design and probably a little more "elegant" since you unscrew a small portion of the barrel. But ones you typically find in the wild require a replacement diaphragm in order to completely fill with ink. It's best to start with an aerometric and then later on, if you feel the need to have one, get a vacumatic as well.
SallyLyn
Jul 14 2008, 11:08 PM
Have and Love both. Agree with everything previously mentioned. My experience shows the Vac is harder, takes a lot longer to fully clean of ink.
My favorite writing "51" is a Vac, but start with the Aero. You'll be happy.
david i
Jul 14 2008, 11:29 PM
QUOTE (emes441 @ Jul 13 2008, 03:45 PM)

I see that there a few different types of Parker 51s- areomatic and vacumatic. Which one is the best (and where is the best place to get a good, reliable one with a fine nib).
Generally the Vacs are more collected/collectable (whatever that means), offering higher cachet colors, caps, trim etc.
Aeros often are viewed as being bit "easier" for the user-oriented fan.
Both have their charms.
regards
david
Bill Smith
Jul 14 2008, 11:38 PM
Both the 51 Vac and Aero have their pluses and minuses. I own both kinds and I am happy with both filling systems 'nough said.
penpimperLV
Jul 15 2008, 05:32 AM
QUOTE (david i @ Jul 14 2008, 04:29 PM)

QUOTE (emes441 @ Jul 13 2008, 03:45 PM)

I see that there a few different types of Parker 51s- areomatic and vacumatic. Which one is the best (and where is the best place to get a good, reliable one with a fine nib).
Generally the Vacs are more collected/collectable (whatever that means), offering higher cachet colors, caps, trim etc.
Aeros often are viewed as being bit "easier" for the user-oriented fan.
Both have their charms.
regards
david

Oh my! Those are
beautiful! I'm so jealous!
Nihontochicken
Jul 15 2008, 05:41 AM
Get an Aero first. Then decide whether you're a 51 freak, and, if so (welcome to the Borg!), then contemplate a 51 Vac. Aeros aren't as sexy as Vacs, but work better (both versions write equally well, but Aero sacs just don't fail like Vac diaphragms, and Aeros evacuate old ink like Roto-Rooter, whereas Vacs are more akin to trying to flush your toilet with an eyedropper). The older Aeros with silver breather tubes can experience tube rot, which won't allow a full fill, but the repair is simpler/cheaper than a more probable Vac diaphragm fix.
DerMann
Jul 15 2008, 12:56 PM
The Chinese ruined aerometric pens for me :\
Personally I would go for a vacumatic because it can hold buckets of ink and I just like the vacumatic filling system.
However, as other people said, buy an aerometric first, then a vacumatic.
J English Smith
Jul 16 2008, 03:16 AM
[views d.i. photo]
[goes off to cry, they are so lovely]
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.