I've enjoyed reading over the Pelikan forum the past few days in anticipation of ordering my first Pel, a 215. I'm already lusting for an M800 and M625! Now that I've settled on the 215 (with thoughts of replacing it in a few years with a bigger bird) I'm wondering what would be the best nib for me.
I'm a relative noob to fountain pens, so I'm not sure I'd appreciate the difference between a steel and a gold nib (hence the 215 instead of a M400). I've been writing with an extra-fine Lamy Al-Star and I find that I like the line it puts down--to my eye, it's nearly identical to the Pilot G-2 07mm gel pens I've been using the past few years. I do really prefer a fine or extra-fine writer. I've used a M Waterman Phileas and found it to be too wide for my tastes. I'm going to be writing my thesis in the coming months, so I'll really be putting it through it's paces.
Unfortunately, there isn't a Pelikan dealer anywhere nearby, so I can't test different nibs firsthand. I downloaded Richard Binder's "Stroke Width Chart for Reground Nibs" and compared my Al-Star output to his custom XF round nibs. Since it is $45 more, I'm wondering if I should pony up for his services or if I'd be just as happy with a fine that his shop looked over before sending out. Does a Binder fine write as small as the Al-Star extra-fine, or perhaps only a little larger? I'd hate to run the risk of getting a stock XF from other retailers and finding that it has trouble (I take it this is common among new XF Pelikan nibs). I'm not worried about the added cost for the XF and have total confidence that a Binder nib on a Pelikan pen would be a dream--I'm just not sure if I ought to go for a Fine, Extra-Fine or Binder Extra-Fine. Would anyone with experience with these nibs care to chime in?
Thanks!
