QUOTE(goodguy @ Jul 9 2008, 05:22 PM) [snapback]664852[/snapback]
QUOTE(QM2 @ Jul 9 2008, 05:07 PM) [snapback]664832[/snapback]
In my opinion, turning the 1911 into a piston filler is just one step further toward an already too-close-for-comfort MB Meisterstueck imitation.
Very intersting insight.
Hmmm you got a point there
But there is one things that is the main thing that devides betwenn MB and Sailor and thats the nib.
I do love MB nibs and owning a Sailor nib should be a whole different experience even though the cigar shaped body looks closly the same.
Just as a theoretical question would you feel more confortable with a different kind of a filling method ?
Lever filler,ED...etc ?
You are right of course: The Sailor nib
is unique and quite famous -- which I think is another reason why it is a shame that they downplay the company's uniqueness by concentrating on the model that is visually imitative rather on the model that is original in design. The Pro-Gear/Sapporo has the same nib as the 1911. What a powerful combination the original beauty of this model's shape
and the Sailor nib would make!...
Filling systems... It is funny, because it took me a while to gravitate towards this point of view, but I now prefer piston and lever fillers to CC. If you look at my earlier reviews, they say that I like CC, but this has changed. I've discovered that I develop interesting emotional attachments to the pens with internal filling systems, which does not happen with CC filling pens.
Out of internal filling systems, I like both the piston and the lever filler, probably equally, but for different reasons. Also crescent, but that is really just a version of the lever. I do not like the eyedropper system, because it is very impractical for me at this time.
I would love to see a lever
or piston fill Pro-Gear model; that would be incredibly exciting.