QUOTE(davefoe @ Jun 24 2008, 01:03 PM) [snapback]649759[/snapback]
I would say if you enjoy a firm nib, with a "pencil" type feel, get the Prelude. The Legacy nibs are softer (18K gold) and a little flexy, and personally, I don't like that feel. I prefer a good old Sheaffer firm nib. But it's a matter of choice. Sheaffer badly needs a pen choice in between the Prelude and the Legacy, something around $100, with a stainless steel or plated inlaid nib. Maybe someday they'll wise up and put the Imperial back on the market!
Dave
Dave, I fear that you and I may be destined to post in tandem on all the recent Sheaffer woes.
I strongly agree that Sheaffer needs a model in between the Prelude and the Legacy. As I've probably mentioned before (sorry to belabor a point), I suggested to an official Sheaffer personage, a few months ago, that the reintroduced Targa - if it appears - should be offered with steel nibs as well as gold nibs. His response was to the effect that there was concern about steel causing undue wear on the nib tools, inclining the company toward fitting the pens exclusively with gold nibs. So what seems like an obvious choice to fill a hole in the product range - a steel Inlaid Nib model - may entail less-than-obvious complications.
No wonder prices for vintage Imperials - steel and gold nibbed alike - have been rising!
Cheers,
Jon
PS Here's a question. Conceding that production of steel nibs may "use up" a tool more quickly: is Sheaffer's plan to produce new Targas just until the old tools give up the ghost, and then discontinue the model once again? I mean...how many tools must have been worn out over the long lifetime of the original Targa? Isn't it possible to produce new tooling when the old tooling is worn out? And if production of new tooling, as necessary, is not in the Sheaffer plans, then mustn't one wonder about the long-term commitment to the brand?