QUOTE(ethernautrix @ Jun 11 2008, 02:10 PM) [snapback]637938[/snapback]
Hey, Splicer... isn't this a FOUNTAIN PEN forum?
HA HA HA HA HA!
I kid! Seriously, I kid you. But I had to remark, having read the headline and having read your arguments against the Lamy sub-forum. Hee!
um...
they're fountain pens.
really.
they just have a needle for a nib and tube for a feed.Yeah, that's it.
Seriously, the reason that I think they should have their own subforum is because it would necessarily expand the scope of the site. I think it would be a shame to start "stylographicfountainpennetwork.com" when there's so much expertise right here. There are enough similarities that I think that FPN is an appropriate place for stylograph topics, but enough differences that I don't really think that it should be mixed in with the "regular" fountain pen stuff.
Lamy pens are well-served by the Writing Instruments forum. Maybe they'd be better served by their own subforum; I've already given my opinion about that, but that was just my opinion. I'm not categorically opposed to a Lamy subforum, I just don't think it would be beneficial to the Lamy users and I'll be happy to be proven wrong.
Stylographs are not so well-served by the Writing Instruments forum, though they could be and I'm perfectly willing to let loose with my rapidograph talk in WI to see if it gets some momentum. There are a lot of technical pen users out there that might come to FPN and decide that this isn't the place to ask their questions and move on from the site altogether. Not so with a "missing" brand focus forum.
Again, I'm happy not to have any action taken now, but I'm taking this thread and some of the posts in it as a green light to just keep posting stylograph stuff in the regular forums and see if the topics get any traction. I might just get one of those Rapidosketch pens I saw in Flax and write a review.
[edited to add emoticons and text sizes to lighten the tone to the shade I'd intended]