Hello,
I'm brand new here, so sorry if I embarrass myself with my limited knowledge! I am soon to buy my first "big" fountain pen - and hopefully my last. I want something that should last a lifetime, up to now I've only had LAMY Safaris, which get quite uncomfortable after long writing perionds, but have been ok on the whole.
So I'm considering a Montblanc - my dad's had his for 20 years and it's still as good as new, even the finish if almost flawless - good signs. I blush and admit I do want a cartridge pen, it's just so much more convenient for me, I go all over the place and it's much easier to carry round cartridges than big ink bottles! So I'm heavily considering either a MB Meisterstuck Chopin, or a Meisterstuck LeGrand Traveller - the fact that the latter can't take a piston converter isn't too much of an issue.
My issue now is that I've just been slightly unnerved by all this stuff I've read about controversy surrounding Montblanc; is it purely due to the "image" a Montblanc gives off, or performance issues, or...what?
I initially presumed it was due to them being percieved as overpriced; presumably because people have paid the money and not got swift performance, on some occasions; but doesn't the same occur for other brands? -Every manufacturer produces a lemon once in a while, surely? And are these problems not usually fixed under warranty? Their price is the same as many other brands I've tried (high-end parkers, high-end watermans, pelikan, caran d'ache), and in my view the Montblancs are the best performers - or in other words, they certainly aren't significantly worse, which is the only reason I could imagine people claiming them to be overpriced. So is it an "image" thing?
Just curious... much appreciated!
