Form
This nifty little pen comes in the usual Pilot hard-plastic case with booklet, cartridge and converter (Pilot Con-50). Like the Prera it also takes the Con-20. A seller told me the Stella 90s would also take the Con-70, but I haven't got a 70 on hand so cannot confirm that.
The Stella bears other similarities to the Prera in shape, size, and silvery trimmings. Unlike the plastic-bodied Prera, however, the Stella is dressed in pearly-painted brass casing. If I recall correctly the promotional material says that the finish is studded with pearls to resemble the stars in the sky, or something to that effect; hence the name Stella. Available colors are red, white, blue, and black.
Like all Pilot products, this one is well-finished and solidly constructed. As you can see from the attached photos the Stella is a small pen comparable to the Sailor Sapporo, or the Pelikan 400 in size; but I suspect it'd properly dwarf the Pelikan 300. I don't have with me my Sailor Minis or PG full-sized else they'd probably contrast better; hopefully, the ubiquitous Safaries work as a size-comparison.
Due to its metal casing, the Stella weights slightly more than the rest shown in the photo below except one. It has a tiny bit of heft compare to the others, but hardly noticeable to me. Actually, I find it feels solid and compact in use; a good feel. I weighted them all using a postal scale; they may not be exact, but I also use the postal scale to weight cooking ingredients, and so far haven't had any accident in the kitchen.
1/ Stella - 1.0 oz (un-inked with con-50)
2/ Prera - 0.6 oz (un-inked with con-20)
3/ Sapporo - 0.6 oz (un-inked with converter)
4/ Safari - 0.6 oz (ink half-full; yeep I'm the half-full kind)
5/ Pelikan 400 - 0.7 oz (un-inked)
Function
From experience, I've not been disappointed by a Pilot nib before and this one is no exception. The nib is 14k rhodium plated. I pick the F for this Stella, and it writes like an F; comparable to other Pilot F in line-width I suppose. Incidentally, I was surprised by the Prera F since it wrote more like an XXF; but that was a nice surprise. If you can see from my writing sample the Pelikan 400 EF writes broader that the Stella F, ditto Safari F.
I would say the nib is responsively smooth instead of buttery smooth; meaning one can actually feel every stroke on the paper instead of the nib just gliding over the paper. I prefer responsive smooth. I suspect though the nib might be a bit catchy on rougher paper. Also, the nib is fairly rigid, but not nail-hard like the Prera. The feel is closer to the Sapporo and Pelikan 400; slightly springy not flexible.
All in all, I like the Stella in both form and function. I wonder though if I may be better off picking a darker color. The sparkling white makes me hesitate in using it without washing my hands, even though its glossy surface would probably repel any kind of staining. The pearly white color doesn't show up well on my photos but anyways. I've received lots of helpful information reading this forum I hope this brief review might in turn be helpful to someone who's interested in the Stella 90s.
----------------------------
Click to view attachment
Click to view attachment
Click to view attachment
Click to view attachment
Click to view attachment
Click to view attachment
Click to view attachment