QUOTE (Melnicki @ Jul 23 2008, 10:11 PM)

i'd like everyone to put their heads to this, because i just haven't seen a blue-black ink to look like this!!! it's incredible.
As I learned about in defending my MS thesis,
about maybe making things more complicated than necessary,
could this be a case for Occam's Razor? *
My thoughts when I discovered DuPont blue-black is unavailable
were to mix something like 4 parts of their blue with 1 part of their black
(admittedly I'm looking for something substantially blue).
Haven't tried this yet, but for one thing should minimize
what I understand can be undesirable outcomes.
As when mixing say an acidic ink with more neutral one,
the resulting ink may have hardly any of the good qualities of either,
or some kind of sludge might precipitate out of the solution.
(OK, worst case I know, but why not start out simple?)
http://www.2think.org/occams_razor.shtml *
"William of Occam (or Ockham) (1284-1347) was an English philosopher and theologian. His work on knowledge, logic and scientific inquiry played a major role in the transition from medieval to modern thought. He based scientific knowledge on experience and self-evident truths, and on logical propositions resulting from those two sources. In his writings, Occam stressed the Aristotelian principle that entities must not be multiplied beyond what is necessary. This principle became known as Occam's (or Ockham's) Razor or the law of parsimony. A problem should be stated in its basic and simplest terms. In science, the simplest theory that fits the facts of a problem is the one that should be selected.
This rule is interpreted to mean that the simplest of two or more competing theories is preferable and that an explanation for unknown phenomena should first be attempted in terms of what is already known."
<snip>