I stopped by The Paper Zone, one of our local paper specialty shops yesterday, and picked up a few samples of some different papers to try out.
The two papers I tested were Conqueror 70# Text, and Conqueror sub 26.6# Writing.
The Conqueror range of papers (www.conqueror.com) appears to be a primarily available in the UK, and is a division of ArjoWiggins Fine Papers.
I had never heard of it before discovering it serendipitously at the Paper Zone.
Alas, Paper Zone does not seem to list the Conqueror paper on their web site.
I apologize in advance for the lack of scans. No scanner.
The inks I tested were:
Noodler's X-Feather in a Pilot VP F
Aurora Black in a Visconti Pericle with a Mottishaw'd EF Bock Nib
Noodler's Kiowa Pecan in a Pilot VP F
Noodler's Zhivago in a Lamy Safari M
Noodler's El Lawrence in a Lamy Al-Star F
Results:
The Conqueror 26.6# Writing and the Conquerer 70# Text were both amazing.
The 26.6# Writing had almost NO Feathering with the X-Feather, Aurora Black, or the Kiowa Pecan, and very slight feather with the Zhivago and El Lawrence. There was no bleed through with any of these inks, and the paper is smooth.
The 70# Text, however, was flawless. This paper is as good as the HP Premium Choice 32# Laserjet that, for me, is the gold standard for FP friendly paper. This paper had NO feathering with any of my test inks, NO bleed through, and the pen glided over the paper effortlessly.
The bad news is the price.
At my local Staples and Office Depot, HP Premium Choice goes for around $17.00 for a ream of 500.
At Paper Zone, a ream of 500 sheets of the Conquerer 70# is $26.99.
Is Conquerer better than the HP? No. Not really. According to the Print Industry Newsleter 28# Laser or Bond is about equivalent to a 70# text, so the HP 32# Paper would be about the thickness of an 80# Text, ergo the HP is actually a tad thickler, but if you were to hand me a piece of the 70# Conquerer and a piece of the 32# HP, I probably would not be able to tell them apart based on th thickness of an individual sheet. They are really close, and the brightness of both pages are very close as well.
It is certainly not worth paying a 40% premium for a nearly functionally identical product.
If, for some reason, HP Premium Choice suddenly became unavailable, I would stock up on the Conqueror.
But, to me, there is no significant difference in thickness, smoothness, or performance that would sway me toward or away from either produce, so, a bug thumbs up for the Conqueror, but for now I'll stick with the HP.