The handwritten Review may be hard to read, as this color does not scan very well. Transcription and other thoughts follow the images.
Click to view attachment
Click to view attachment
This ink is significantly lighter than I thought it would be. It starts pale purple, but dries more blue.
Decent water resistance, it does not smear with a moistened finger.
No discernible odor in the jar.
Ink shows very little shading, and the normally buttery smooth nib on the Waterman Charleston is a bit "squeaky" in certain directions.
{/Handwritten Ink Review}
In testing pen combos, I dipped one of the "Sharper Image" pens from winedoc (wet medium nib), and it draws a heavier, much easier to read line that dries more purple than blue. I will need to load a converter and see how it actually behaves with this ink.
So far, I would say that if you are a fan of dry (or semi-dry) and fine nibs, this ink is NOT for you. However, if your nibs are wet and put a thick line down, this is a nice, if not extraordinary purple. However, Waterman Purple, PR Purple Mojo, PR Tanzanite, and Violette Pensee are probably better choices.
Addendum: There is absolutely no feathering or bleedthrough on the 28# paper. However, on a small Moleskine that most other inks feather on, it has intermittent bleedthrough (the tips of the double strokes on 't's) and very, very, very slight feathering (had to use a loupe to see it).
I did not experience any start-up problems in any of the three pens I have loaded this ink into (Waterman Hemispehere F, Waterman Charleston M, 'Sharper Image' M), but these are all well behaved pens.