QUOTE(Nirvana5253 @ Feb 12 2008, 07:14 AM) [snapback]511790[/snapback]
well now i am thoroughly confused. Firstly, the reason I am selling this is that a box of pens (yes a box haha) is being sent to me from home that my dad literally found while salvaging a house. I know that this particular parker is of greater historical significance than others hence me selling it. the whole poor college student thing is also a mild factor :-D. anyways- Im not sure why you say the appraisal is inflated. Michael said that he looked at the posts on here (in the parker forum) as well as the pictures I sent him personally. I mean, given that the pen could go for anywhere up to 1400, I thought trying to get at leas 6-700 was a pretty good bargain. Perhaps Im wrong?
Hi,
I will dive in on this.
Whilst i believe i'm not the one who said any appraisal here is inflated (inflated has an
active flavor to it that makes me uncomfortable), I do believe a couple points have become clear via this conversation:
1) Different views of pen value (different appraisals values) are not uncommon, and the highest found might be, but might NOT be , the most accurate
and
2) A theoretical appraisal at any level might or might not reflect a real world retail price, never mind wholesale price, or any gray zone price in between.
Further, i do not offhand know of which pens are in your lot, but
historical significance is a bit of a nebulous term. No evil there, but the word does not help me when it comes to an ad soliciting bids. A pen might be older than another, but is that
historically significant? I s'pose i lean more towards Collector Cachet- that mix of rarity and desirability- to describe the import- if not the price- of a pen.
QUOTE
Michael said that he looked at the posts on here (in the parker forum) as well as the pictures I sent him personally.
I sort of wish that names had not come in on this conversation, but we have what we have. Michael is a professional in every sense. A good guy, skilled restorer and respected seller of pens. I would rather debate the notion of the appraisal itself than perhaps have to see, "gee, this time i disagree with Michael", but hey, we are where we are now. It is possible to like and respect my fellow hobbyists even whilst occasionally disagreeing on some nuance.
QUOTE
I mean, given that the pen could go for anywhere up to 1400
And it is here that several of us at least seemingly disagree with what you cite from Michael, though perhaps we do not disagree as you have cited an appraisal of $800-$1400 (conveniently now described as "up to $1400") not an offer.
See, putting aside Michael and focusing on you, i assert the phrase "a pen could go for anywhere up to $1400" is a meaningless statement. I could find a chewed up bic and opine that it "could" go for $1400. I also might win a lottery. Many things "could" happen. A better question might be, "what have been prior price points for sales of pens such as this, accounting for model, condition and market".
In other words, I invite anyone to show me that in the entire history of pen collecting that a worn and olived Parker 28 1/2 has ever
gone for $1400.
And, i imply in that invitation that none ever has. I greatly doubt claim that this pen could go for anywhere in the close range to $800 (a key part of that appraisal now being forgotten) never mind $1400.
What if five other people propose this pen could retail for up to $75? Which appraisal then is correct?
It seems you heard one very nice number and several other less nice numbers on this pen, and are convinced the high end is a rational retail target. That is fine, but i simply disagree. Indeed, i suspect a near perfect version of this pen would struggle to get to that $800-1400 that was cited, and this pen is 1/2 or less of a perfect pen. AOn the other hand, time will tell.
regards
david