QUOTE (Carrie @ Nov 20 2005, 09:32 PM)
I've got to agree with Ray about the photos. Just out of interest, what camera are you using? Also, what settings? I'm always interested to hear how people have taken a photo. I really need to get a decent Macro lens for my Nikon, it's rather silly that I've been getting better pen photo results with a little 90 quid camera when with my D70.
Maybe once you've got some more responses you'll tell us which photos have the most accurate colour representation and which you prefer.
Hi Carrie,
I am using a Canon 350D, and in this case with a macro lens (60 mm, which amounts to 96 on this camera when converted to 35 mm format) and a TS-E 90 mm (144 mm converted), 3 flashes, a main one to the side, 2 small slave units, one at the back, one to the top right, or right back, depending on the result I want to achieve.
Manual focus and settings, 1/160 s and F11 in all cases, to get enough DOF (depth of field), camera mounted on a big sturdy tripod, remote release cable, angle finder with magnification of 1.25 and 2.5 X for accurate focusing.
The pens etc. were placed on a plate of perspex, very carefully cleaned of grime and dust (very difficult and time consuming

), a blue one for the d'Inverno, a dark grey one for the Indian Nights. Oh, I had some black velvet on top of the light tent (light cube) to prevent reflections of the top side in the perspex. Any non-transparnt not too heavy material will do for that, though.
I experimented a lot with the light setup, a bit higher, a bit lower, at the sides, at the back, to the right, etc., just to get the results I was looking for. I took about 150 pictures, and threw away a lot, mostly because of dust and over- or under-exposure (the cam doesn't take the small flash guns into account, they're not coupled).
You could do the same with a few day-light bulbs, btw, but you need a few stands for those. I have the bulbs, but didn't build the stands yet. It certainly is a very much cheaper solution than a bundle of flash-guns. You could use normal bulbs as well, but most cameras don't deal well with normal bulbs when it comes to white balance.
Regarding lenses: I'd recommend a 100 mm lens or thereabouts, or a TS or PC lens if you can afford one. The Nikon ones are very good, so that shouldn't be a problem. You could also think of buying a few extension rings, to allow closer focusing, and as a cheaper solution, a close-up lens, at least a 3.00 D or 5.00 D (B&W makes excellent ones). But you do have to focus manually. I find the camera has a fair amount of problems picking the right focus point. The point it focuses on is sharp, but because it can't think like a human, it doesn't necessarily pick a point where all comes into focus. With the cosumer cams, you have focal distances and lens openings that are very small, which means virtually everything is in focus all the time anyway. This is probably why the results with the cheaper cam look so good, especially at the lower resolution used on the internet.
HTH, warm regards, Wim