QUOTE(Roger @ Nov 10 2005, 10:11 AM) [snapback]46552[/snapback]
Nice, Bryan!
I think Nathan had blood in mind with both Tiananmen and Antietem, and one would imagine more dirt mixed in with the Antietem.
BTW, I always thought it was spelled Antietem, but Nathan spells it Antietam. A quick google through some history finds various authors spelling it both ways! Somebody has to reign in this crazy english language.

You could always take the southern solution: call it Sharpsburg.
This was really brought home to me in 2002 when my family made a trip to Tennessee for NCFCA (National Christian Forensics & Communications Association) National Tournament. My middle child was competing in Lincoln-Douglas values debate, and several individual events. In any case, my sister in law and her family lived near where the tournament was held, so we stayed with them. Her then husband (the creek left her for a younger woman) was showing us around some landmarks and talking about "the War". Which in Tennessee, is apparently equivalent to "that recent unpleasantness" in the remainder of the south. He would refer to battles by the name the Confederacy gave them, while I was more familiar with the name the Federals gave them. The south named battles about towns or farms, while the north named them after bodies of water. E.g., Bull Run is a creek which runs through Manassas Junction in Virginia (1st land battle of the war) Sharpsburg is the town through which Antietam Creek runs, etc.
<set mode=pedantic> BTW, the English language needs to be reined in, rather than reigned in. The incorrect usage of reign in place of rein would be considered a malaprop, wherein the incorrect usage could be correct, if the meaning were slightly skewed, e.g., the language needs to be ruled from above to correction, rather than being guided by the reins, as a horse. <set mode=normal>
I supposed I'm a really bad combination. An English and History buff combined. Not quite the Adrian Monk of English teachers, but my children think I'm close.
Donnie