QUOTE(Kalessin @ Jan 15 2008, 09:41 PM) [snapback]479789[/snapback]
From what's visible, I think the pen is most likely genuine if MB ever used plastiic threads on the section. I couldn't find a picture on the internet that showed another older cartridge/converter filler like yours that has the plastic threads. The converter looks like an older MB converter, the rings look correct and the engraving looks right. The nib style is the older one, which can be seen (along with the newer one) at
http://www.fountainpen.de/c-montblanc-meisterstueck-144.htm I will attempt to amplify Kalessin's point here, and comment that while we are all aware of MB fakes out there, a lot of them seem to be some of the less common models (ie, Starwalker vs Meisterstueck). We should consider the changes both the 146s and 149s have undergone over the years. We've discussed in this forum over the past three weeks the changes of the 146 nibs from mono-color to bi-color (&/or tri-color for the 149s), the differences in feeds, the cap ring font differences, clip ring stampings and engravings, solid brass piston mechanism threads, resin piston filler threads, ink window vs. ink slot window.
Why don't we think it's entirely logical for this man's pen to have resin threads, when we know that Montblanc's manufacturing techniques have changed over time? Lack of internet proof is not enough for me, and I agree with Kalessin that photos may not tell the whole story.
The fakery panacea seems to be enveloping a lot of folks right now. But I ask you to look at what is being faked: LEs, Starwalkers, etc., and for other manufacturers, the types of pens--guilloche & lacquer finishes, many of which are extremely well made (Cartier & Caran d'Ache). But for MB fakes, especially when you think about the 144/6/9s; why fake a pen that is so prevalent in both private and retail inventory? It would be like counterfeiting $1.00 bills. The watch we saw in this forum last week is a good example of what I am talking about. An item with a low production #, high cache, not a lot of publicity, but enough to make someone think he got a deal.
I believe changes in manufacturing processes, technology, and materials (not to mention style) are most likely the reasons for many of the the differences in the MBs we see as we stumble across these pens we find. I can spot the obvious eBay fakes, what I am having a harder time of these days is the frankenpens. Like the WWII MB pen with a 134 piston and barrel, with a #4 nib and 234 cap. It all fits, and it all works, but it just ain't quite right.
What we should do is take an objective look at each of these requests for help and conduct good research before we give our experience-based answers. We should look at documentation availiable (on and off-line), and take a "reasonable man approach." I found a pen in Goodland, Kansas last summer (actually a mess of broken pens), and the 149 in that pile just didn't seem right. Come to find out it was an early 60s, first generation MB resin pen. I found another exactly like it by accident a couple weeks ago on eBay.
There are always discussions about the Parker and Sheaffer's factories using excess "ancient" inventory to make a variety of pens that cannot readily be explained. Why not Montblanc? Especially the vintage pieces...since we seem to agree that MB caters to the luxury crowd these days.
I'd be interested in hearing other opinions.
Regards, Eric