QUOTE (saintsimon @ Sep 20 2006, 12:38 PM)
Maybe pen companies nowadays want to push the piston 'upmarket', where all the other piston fillers by most of the brands are. Even the M200 is not really cheap.
Was the Go! successful on the market?

With a convenient c/c pen there is no marketing risk involved, as cheap pens have to sell in sufficient numbers.
The Level had problems with the base cracking. At least on the cheaper version.
No, the 200 isn't cheap. But then, for some, even $35 isn't "cheap" and that's what these Go's are sometimes uh...Go-ing for these days. I find that absurd. I think I bought 3 for $33 at some point. Kept none - I didn't care for the nibs. But the folks who got them liked them. I'm just not wild about that nib style. My VP is the closest I get to a nib like that. And I say that having used some very good pens with that nib style. For some reason they just never stayed in the rotation.
I think that it's fair to say that since it was discontinued and since there were many Go's that flooded e-bay for a couple of years that, no, it was not successful. I suppose it was meant to draw in the younger buyer but that even in Europe, the fountain pen market for teens doesn't seem to be very strong. If I was in HS I'd be using a cartridge pen or a ballpoint (eegads!) just as I did when I was in HS. I'd not want to fuss with a piston-filler in the middle of notes.