Diamine WES Kensington Blue Can anyone say what it compares to?
#1
Posted 07 November 2009 - 07:23 AM
Cheers
#4
Posted 07 November 2009 - 09:27 AM
I'd say this is another go at Penman Sapphire. I have a page of each in front of me, and it is very close. Maybe the shading does not pool to quite such depths, but it's not a bad attempt. I can't say I'm seeing any Quink BB teal undertones in daylight myself, but there is not the slightest hint of purple either.
In a wet Pelikan M400 F nib there's very attractive shading and the saturation and flow are both similar to Penman, i.e. lots of both!
John
#5
Posted 07 November 2009 - 12:11 PM
Second page is a writing sample of Diamine Kensington blue, Rohrer & Klingner Permanent Blue and Diamine Presidential Blue. The R&K and the Diamine Presidential do need wet nibs. Otherwise it looks a bit pale.
I like the Kensington very much. It is a tad brighter than the other two inks. It is a medium blue, neither turquoise nor with purple hues.
Kensington blue is not picky. Works perfectly with the Sheaffer Snorkel and I will try another pen next time.
http://i547.photobucket.com/albums/hh474/piembi/Ink%20Samples/DiamineInks1.jpg
http://i547.photobucket.com/albums/hh474/piembi/Ink%20Samples/DiamineInks2.jpg
#9
Posted 07 November 2009 - 10:30 PM
saintsimon, on 08 November 2009 - 05:53 AM, said:
Same here. There is no way the colour of my bottle of Kensington is anywhere near the colour of my Penman Sapphire. It is much closer to the colour of slightly faded Parker Quink Blue-Black.
Are there two batches of this ink out there, with different colours?
#11
Posted 07 November 2009 - 11:02 PM
dcwaites, on 07 November 2009 - 11:30 PM, said:
saintsimon, on 08 November 2009 - 05:53 AM, said:
Same here. There is no way the colour of my bottle of Kensington is anywhere near the colour of my Penman Sapphire. It is much closer to the colour of slightly faded Parker Quink Blue-Black.
Are there two batches of this ink out there, with different colours?
It is darker than the first three samples (Meditterranean, Florida and Royal Blue) and lighter than Presidential blue. It is a medium blue. The scan is somewhat darker than the inks on paper. Maybe the comparison does help.
Coming out of the Sheaffer Snorkel the ink is considerably darker than with the 1.1 Lamy nib. Since the pen has been fitted with a new sac it has been filled with Kensington Blue. No mix with any kind of ink residue. Well, maybe pen and ink are a perfect match :)
#12
Posted 08 November 2009 - 04:09 AM
First off, some reference inks --
http://lh6.ggpht.com/_g_oFvX9K3R0/SvY6WS9KbwI/AAAAAAAAATc/pfke7aixDt0/s640/New%20Reference%20Inks%202c.jpg
Next, 4 Diamine inks --
http://lh5.ggpht.com/_g_oFvX9K3R0/SvY6Qw4zS0I/AAAAAAAAATY/Q__leDpPy3Y/s720/New%20Diamine%20Inks%202c.jpg
Note that the Havasu Turquoise is a little greener than shown, and the Kensington is a little bluer.
Finally, a blend of 9 parts Majestic Blue and 50 parts Havasu Turquoise --
http://lh6.ggpht.com/_g_oFvX9K3R0/SvY93l6BdRI/AAAAAAAAATk/RV4g1AudTO0/s720/HavasuMajestic.jpg
The scanning settings and final brightness were adjusted so that what came out on my screen (iMac 20") was as near as I could get with my scanner. As noted above, the Havasu and Kensington should be visually separated a litte more. I think that there is a green component in the Kensington that is fluorescing.
All samples were written with an E.S. Perry Osmiroid #1 Stub Italic on Stora Enso 4CC paper.
The scanner was turned on and left to warm up for one hour before scanning.
#13
Posted 08 November 2009 - 08:51 AM
John
I really like your Majestic Havasu! It seems to have captured Majestic's astonishing shading and donated it to that cheerful blue. I wonder if one could pull off the same trick by using it in a green or purple?
#14
Posted 08 November 2009 - 02:51 PM
Yours,
Totally Confused
PS Of course this is the fun thing about this network - everyone views things differently
#15
Posted 08 November 2009 - 05:04 PM
This post has been edited by JakobS: 08 November 2009 - 05:08 PM

Sign In
Register
Help

MultiQuote