Jump to content

RHODIA Lg. Webnotebook + 2010 Lg. Planner Review


CopyGuru

Recommended Posts

Rhodia Large Webnotebook and 2010 Large Planner

 

Specs of Webnotebook: 5.5”x8.25” with 192 Pages and 7mm spacing (the Moleskine large is 6mm, Clairefontaine is 8mm, Rhodia staple pads are 7mm) Price is $19-$20

 

Size of Rhodia 2010 Large Planner: 6”x9”, made in USA by QuoVadis- for Rhodia. Price is $19-20

 

MHO (my honest opinion) of the Large Webnotebook…

 

The Larger of the Rhodia Webnotebooks is very nice quality. They have a spongy, soft, leather-like material for the cover. The elastic “web” is loose on the back, not like the Habana which is tight to the rear of the cover when not “webbed” over the cover.

 

The paper is a slight yellow- and is extremely smooth. It’s the heavier 90g Clairefontaine weight- not the 80g used in the Staple-Bound pads. You’d need a paintbrush to get bleed-through. The lines are 7mm in the larger Webnotebook- and I believe 6mm in the smaller version of this notebook. The rulings do not bleed to the edges like Moles or Clairefontaines… this non-bleed looks cleaner IMHO. On the bottom corner of the sheets there is a Rhodia logo. Also- there’s a ribbon to bookmark. I don’t care for them- but I know a lot of people like them.

 

The cover itself is stiff similar to a Habana notebook- not “hard” like the Mole… but in no way too “soft.”

 

Since it is brand new- the signatures are a little tight- but with some use, it’ll lay flat.

 

The first and last sheets are a nice orange color in the orange notebook- and black in the black versions. Also the orange is not as vibrant as the Staple-Bound Rhodia pads.

 

Nice notebook for sure… it would be PERFECT for me if Rhodia offered it in 5x5 as well as 7mm lined.

 

As for the 2010 Large Rhodia Planner…

 

For starters- the planner is not made in France by Rhodia- it is made by QuoVadis in the USA for Rhodia- with the 90g paper- which is heavier than the 80g used in the Rhodia Staple-Bound pads.

 

I would have liked it if the Webnotebook reviewed above and the Planner were the same size- like the Mole planner and notebooks. It just looks cleaner when they are used together.

 

Not only are the sizes different from the Rhodia planner to the Webnotebook- but the cover on the planner is much softer than the cover of the Webnotebook. You can tell they are made by two different companies.

 

I’d say the 2010 Large planner is basically a softer-covered QuoVadis Habana with a Rhodia logo on it. This is by no means bad- QuoVadis planners are awesome- especially the Notor Habana.

 

On the rear, the elastic band “web” sticks tight to the rear of the planner if not in use- which I prefer to the loose web of the Mole or the Webnotebook mentioned above.

 

Overall- I will use the 2010 Rhodia planner this upcoming year… I have given up the Mole planner 2 years ago for the Notor by QuoVadis. And as for the Webnotebook- Since I use FPs only- and prefer 7mm (the Habana is 8mm)--- it looks like this is going to be my new STANDARD.

 

Both products are top quality and worth the money 100% IMHO.

Edited by CopyGuru
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • CopyGuru

    1

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33559
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26744
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...