Jump to content

Parker "51" Single Jewel


christof

Recommended Posts

I have a question to all the Parker "51" experts out there. I am currently working on a visualized timeline of my Parker "51" collection but I do not know when exactly the production of the Parker "51" vacumatic single jewel has been started. Can anyone help me out?

post-18813-0-31704400-1336547020.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Glenn-SC

    4

  • christof

    4

  • George

    3

  • jhoch

    2

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Actually the single jewels started in late 1941.

According to The Parker "51" book, the Single Jewel version of the "51" was introduced in 1942 due to wartime material restrictions.

 

I have never seen a SJ with '41 date stamp. That doesn't mean that they don't exist, I've just never seen one, or heard of one for that matter.

Have you?

I'd love to see a photo of one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help again. Here's the result of my work. Let me know if there should be something wrong:

https://www.fountainpennetwork.com/forum/index.php?/topic/220855-whats-up-at-christofs/page__view__findpost__p__2341290

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't own a first year single jewel, but I have seen pictures of a few of these pens. One actually came up for sale on Ebay a few years back. Check out the first two paragraphs here Parker 51 Versions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I am totally confused by the pens in your link. The first two are labeled 1941 and 1942 in your picture, and then in the text you say they both have 1946 imprints. What am I missing?

 

If you are trying to put together an overall timeline for the type of 51's produced - that is one thing. But why attach only the start date to your individual pens. Why not put the range of production? For instance, 1942-1948, or something. Seems like that might be more meaningful.

Edited by Procyon

"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana." - Groucho Marx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I am totally confused by the pens in your link. The first two are labeled 1941 and 1942 in your picture, and then in the text you say they both have 1946 imprints. What am I missing?

 

If you are trying to put together an overall timeline for the type of 51's produced - that is one thing. But why attach only the start date to your individual pens. Why not put the range of production? For instance, 1942-1948, or something. Seems like that might be more meaningful.

 

Thanks for your comment. You didn't miss something but perhaps I was not clear enough in my description. I wanted to show the changes in design of the different models of the P "51". Of course I do not have a first year pen of every model and that is what I tried to explain in the description. But on the picture I wanted to declare the year of the start of the production of every model. I also thought that it would be clear that the production period only was during the time until the following model has been introduced. But I will change this if you think it would be more meaningful.

 

I am not that Parker "51" expert as you probably are. So please let me know if something is wrong on my timeline or if there is missing a model. This would be very helpful for me. Thanks a lot in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So there are conflicting experts.

 

Until I see one, or have someone here produce one, the truth is unresolved.

 

(and everything sold on eBay 100% authentic, right!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will reiterate from Parker51.com :

 

"In addition, I have been able to inspect a demonstrator with the "1" imprint by the clutch ring and a rounded blindcap."

 

I've seen a couple of single line imprints by the clutch ring that had single jewel bottoms.

 

Regards,

George

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahh, murkiness at the 51's dawning!

Sensitive Pen Restoration doesn't cost extra.

 

Find me on Facebook at MONOMOY VINTAGE PEN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will reiterate from Parker51.com :

 

"In addition, I have been able to inspect a demonstrator with the "1" imprint by the clutch ring and a rounded blindcap."

 

I've seen a couple of single line imprints by the clutch ring that had single jewel bottoms.

 

Regards,

George

George,

 

I'm not sure we count. Tim may not count either.

 

On that avatar, I can make it now less one pen...

 

Todd

San Francisco International Pen Show - The next “Funnest Pen Show” is on schedule for August 23-24-25, 2024.  Watch the show website for registration details. 
 

My PM box is usually full. Just email me: my last name at the google mail address.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I am certainly no expert on the 51's. In fact, I was really surprised to find that the single jewel pens were produced as early as 1942 (or 41, whichever it is). I thought they came much later - I guess because all of mine are 1946 and 1947's. Glad to learn something. :)

"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana." - Groucho Marx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"In addition, I have been able to inspect a demonstrator with the "1" imprint by the clutch ring and a rounded blindcap."

 

The question was "I do not know when exactly the production of the Parker "51" vacumatic single jewel has been started. Can anyone help me out?"

Even if a '41 dated demonstrator is spotted, does that signify production?

Was that a prototype Demo only unit?

Was that "rounded blindcap" added later?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for the date of the single jewel, I looked in The Parker 51 book and sure enough, it says 1942. Sorry for the mixup-should really check my pen library before I post.

 

Regards,

George

Edited by George
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both the 51 and the VAC book say no SJ 51 pens were produced in 1941. Having said that I would add that with the outbreak of the war lots of turmoil was going on in American industry and even at Parker as they prepared to reduce consumption of strategic materials. It would not surprise me at all if a few 1941 SJ pens were produced at the very end of December 41. They were gearing up and the SJ was the thing of the future for Vac pens as a whole. Even if I have never seen a SJ 51 first year pen it would not be a big surprise if there are a rare few of them floating around.

Rod Rumsey

Email me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nice pens christof :thumbup:

Pens are like watches , once you start a collection, you can hardly go back. And pens like all fine luxury items do improve with time

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33553
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26724
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...