Jump to content

Delivered: M215 (M) And Vp (B)


Hohn

Recommended Posts

So yesterday I took delivery of my first "nice" fountain pens from Pam @ Oscar Braun (no affiliation). I got an M215 in Medium (the one with the rings) and a VP with the broad nib. Opinions follow:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

The M215 is a revelation. It has two things I love in particular: great flow, and a some spring to the nib. I was pleasantly surprised just how much give there is to the nib. Coming only from cheaper Lamys, this was a very different experience. In an experienced hand, it could be used to give some flex-based variation. In my clumsy hands, it's a pleasant novelty.

 

I was surprised just how small is the M215. It's downright petite-- almost cute. But it's big enough for my hands (I'm over 6ft tall, with medium hand size). The web of my hand (when held that way) contacts the pen at the twist portion for the piston fill. So I wouldn't want it smaller, but it is big enough. As added bonus for being the perfect "Goldilocks" size, it fits in a front pocket very easily.

 

Balance is perfect, as is weight (which matter less than balance, imo). The pen is light, but has just enough mass to feel substantial.

 

I can see why someone might like a bigger pen or different stylings and such. But I'm convinced that you can't really get much *better* a Pelikan in the higher series-- just *different*-- a little more nib spring, a larger body, a little more panache. Could a ~$400 M800 be four times better than this M215? Not a chance, imo.

 

I think the M215 (and the M2xx in general) are probably safe choices for the daily-carry role. The perform superbly, transport easily, and aren't so expensive that you'd have a cardiac event if something should happen to it.

 

This is my favorite pen, and probably always will be. I don't see myself buying anything more expensive-- if I buy more pens at all. (surely, those are famous last words, lol!)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

The VP was very different.

 

For one, the VP is even smoother than the M215. With both Perle Noir and the included blue Pilot ink cart, it makes a REALLY annoying squeaking sound. The more I used it, the less this seems to be occurring though.

 

I love the retractability of the VP. And I hate it. Why? Because the nib has no immediate connection to the the pen body that you grasp, the nib ends up "floating" inside the pen body. This isolation KILLS all feedback from the tip. Aside from losing the feeling, the results in lost motion as well. Also, the act of retracting the nib seems to fling ink all over the pen's innards, perhaps flying up from the feed. Nothing major, but seems like a preventable oversight.

 

Anyway, I realized why I was fighting the VP so much. I was pushing it too hard, using it like a ball point pen almost. Once I learned to just very lightly grasp it, it no longer had the feeling of fighting the pen- it just soared across the page. It's sooooo smooth. It glides along so smoothly that it makes my writing sloppy, in that I can't seem to control it very well.

 

I do like the VP. While I prefer the M215, the VP is definitely a keeper.

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

The M215 and VP have a lot in common. The both are very popular, enough to where replacement nibs are easy to source, and customizations from someone like Richard Binder are easily obtained. They also both carry VERY well in a front pocket or shirt pocket.

 

 

I had surmised that choosing two such very popular FPs as my first "real" FPs was a safe bet, and that tack appears to have been valid.

 

 

Justin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Hohn

    3

  • troglokev

    1

  • Bookman

    1

  • DAYoung

    1

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

As the owner of two M200s and a former M215 owner I must agree that the Pelikans are great pens. The 200 series is very small - that's my only complaint about them.

 

I have two VPs as well and adore them. I have no issues with loss of feedback...I just appreciate their unbeatable convenience!

 

NM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulations. Thanks for the review and I wish you much enjoyment.

Dave

 

Thankful for being blessed with a genteel life and wonderful wife

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something I forgot to mention about the VP-- the CON-50 cart converter.

 

It's terrible-- absolutely just terribly designed.

 

Firstly, the end is WIDE OPEN. See this pic from Brian Goulet:

http://www.gouletpens.com/v/vspfiles/photos/PN69899-2.jpg

 

This means that it flows freely which is good. You aren't going to have the dreaded "bubble" phenomenon in this converter, as the OD is large enough to prevent that capillary action with all but the most viscous inks.

 

But there is no positive seal to the converter where it nests into the feed that I can tell. A "proper" design IMO would have a radial seal O-ring around the outside base of the CON-50, creating a positive seal here. You can tell that this leaks because as you twist the piston upward, you can hear air rushing in around the seal where it SHOULD be sucking ink up into the reservoir. :doh:

 

Another beef with the design: the piston comes only down to the "stop" in the middle of the converter. That means you will ALWAYS have a substantial air pocket in the converter, and this wastes ink capacity and reduces feed regularity (more pressure variation).

 

Related to this is that there is NO visual indication of how well you have filled the pen. With the converter nested into the pen, you will ALWAYS see an "empty" converter. :doh:

 

 

So to sum up, the CON-50 gives you a converter that fills poorly, feeds freely (but inconsistently), and frustrates almost every important element of the ink-filling process.

 

Other than that, not bad. :bonk: :bonk:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many people have reported greater satisfaction with the CON-20 converter, so perhaps you should try it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps. I think that's the button-filler, right? Not sure how that works, but I trust pistons-- at least ones that are "proper."

 

JMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the con 20 is the squeeze converter. i think it will get more ink in it. and if you push the 50 in far enough, it won't leak at all.

 

the 70 is the button converter, and doesn't fit in the vp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My M215 is my favorite pen and daily writer. You'll love yours even more over time, Hohn. Excellent choice.

I love the smell of fountain pen ink in the morning.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But there is no positive seal to the converter where it nests into the feed that I can tell. A "proper" design IMO would have a radial seal O-ring around the outside base of the CON-50, creating a positive seal here. You can tell that this leaks because as you twist the piston upward, you can hear air rushing in around the seal where it SHOULD be sucking ink up into the reservoir. :doh:

 

Push harder. My experience with Pilot converters is that they are usually a very tight fit. It sounds to me like you haven't seated the converter properly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33577
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26766
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...