Jump to content

Parker Green Vacumatic in WWII


Randorider

Recommended Posts

Last month I bought a nice green vacumatic set in an antique store in Florida. It is personalized LT. Gordon B. Chapman Q.M.C. The date code is 1 with no dots which at the time I thought was first quarter. I did some Internet research and found that Lt. Chapman may have graduated from a military school in 1941, then was killed in WWII. The pen set I thought might have been a graduation gift. As I read more about vacumatics I realized I had the date code wrong, that no dots means fourth quarter, which would make this less likely a difficult graduation gift in 1941.

A few weeks ago I saw a similar set on ebay and noticed that it too was engraved with an officer's name and rank and the Q.M.C. initials. Because this officer was a major I thought it was unlikely to be a graduation gift.

So now I'm wondering whether the quartermaster corps issued green vacumatics to its officers. Have you seen any other green vacumatics with this personalization? I don't have my pen now, I sent it out to have the diaphram, so here's a photo of the pen I saw on ebay.

 

Len

post-4421-1230856801_thumb.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Randorider

    4

  • Richard

    3

  • david i

    2

  • John Danza

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Last month I bought a nice green vacumatic set in an antique store in Florida. It is personalized LT. Gordon B. Chapman Q.M.C. The date code is 1 with no dots which at the time I thought was first quarter. I did some Internet research and found that Lt. Chapman may have graduated from a military school in 1941, then was killed in WWII. The pen set I thought might have been a graduation gift. As I read more about vacumatics I realized I had the date code wrong, that no dots means fourth quarter, which would make this less likely a difficult graduation gift in 1941.

A few weeks ago I saw a similar set on ebay and noticed that it too was engraved with an officer's name and rank and the Q.M.C. initials. Because this officer was a major I thought it was unlikely to be a graduation gift.

So now I'm wondering whether the quartermaster corps issued green vacumatics to its officers. Have you seen any other green vacumatics with this personalization? I don't have my pen now, I sent it out to have the diaphram, so here's a photo of the pen I saw on ebay.

 

Len

 

The two digit date code indicates production first quarter 1938.

 

Green was a typical color well documented for regular sale.

 

Barring the highly improbable discovery of a vintage requisition sheet from the military, etc, it will be difficult to support a claim that the military ordered any (or only) green Vacumatic run for its staff. Too- pure speculation on my part- noting that the pen shown was a quite high end (expensive) FP back in the day, I s'pose i find it a bit unlikely the US Army decided to outfit its staff routinely with such pens.

 

regards

 

David

Edited by david i
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to Col. John A. Hauck, U.S. Army (ret), the Army purchased exactly zero fountain pens for issue to its personnel. Col. Hauck (then a Staff Sergeant) was the Division Clerk for the Seventh Army, in the Aleutians. He used the standard Army issue writing instrument, a wooden-handled steel-nibbed dip pen. Soldiers who wanted to use fountain pens brought their own pens with them, received them as gifts from home, or purchased what was available in the PX. It was to rear-echelon PXes the world over that pens destined for the military went; Col. Hauck told me that they virtually never showed up in combat-zone PXes.

 

FWIW, both Dwight Eisenhower and Douglas MacArthur carried pens they brought with them, Ike a GF-capped Buckskin Beige "51" given to him by Kenneth Parker and MacArthur a Big Red Duofold. If the Army were issuing fountain pens, the supreme commanders of the European and Pacific Theaters would certainly have been at the top of the list.

Edited by Richard

sig.jpg.2d63a57b2eed52a0310c0428310c3731.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The photo in my original post was the pen I saw on ebay because my pen is not available for photographs. Yes they are a couple years apart in manufacturing, but they are similar vacumatics with similar engravings. Sorry for that confusion.

 

This interesting Parker advertisement from 1944 implies that 60% of Parker pens were going to the army and the navy. Was 60% of Parker's pen production at this time wooden handled steel nib dip pens? That's one unlikely possibility. A more reasonable possibility is that the pens were going to the PX to sell to soldiers and sailors and that Parker was misleading in its advertising. It could also be that 60% of Parker production was not pens but was something else that the military needed. Again a reasonable possibility but also a misleading advertisement. Or possibly Colonel Hauck is wrong.

 

I agree, the pens used by Eisenhower and MacArthur are not conclusive. You could present a good argument that they would not use army-issue pens. Maybe MacArthur would use a big, bold, distinctive pen and Eisenhower would use a more modern pen, each distinguishing himself from his army-issue using subordinates.

 

David's cost analysis is very persuasive. Maybe it was the style of the quartermaster corps officers to buy themselves similar pens at the PX. Or maybe, because the quartermaster corps had influence on which companies would get army contracts, it was Parker that presented nice pens to the officers in the quartermaster corps.

 

Len

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The photo in my original post was the pen I saw on ebay because my pen is not available for photographs. Yes they are a couple years apart in manufacturing, but they are similar vacumatics with similar engravings. Sorry for that confusion.

 

This interesting Parker advertisement from 1944 implies that 60% of Parker pens were going to the army and the navy. Was 60% of Parker's pen production at this time wooden handled steel nib dip pens? That's one unlikely possibility. A more reasonable possibility is that the pens were going to the PX to sell to soldiers and sailors and that Parker was misleading in its advertising. It could also be that 60% of Parker production was not pens but was something else that the military needed. Again a reasonable possibility but also a misleading advertisement. Or possibly Colonel Hauck is wrong.

 

I agree, the pens used by Eisenhower and MacArthur are not conclusive. You could present a good argument that they would not use army-issue pens. Maybe MacArthur would use a big, bold, distinctive pen and Eisenhower would use a more modern pen, each distinguishing himself from his army-issue using subordinates.

 

David's cost analysis is very persuasive. Maybe it was the style of the quartermaster corps officers to buy themselves similar pens at the PX. Or maybe, because the quartermaster corps had influence on which companies would get army contracts, it was Parker that presented nice pens to the officers in the quartermaster corps.

 

Len

 

Hi,

 

We lack, i believe, a significant enough sampling to draw any conclusions or even serious hypotheses as to the purchasing habits of military pen buyers regarding color/brand/model/make. Speculation can be fun, but even then it is helpful to consider the breadth and depth of the data/observation from which we launch into it.

 

Offhand, i vaguely recall seeing other makes and other color Vacs with military personalizations, though I have not kept data carefully regarding this issue.

 

best regards

 

david

Edited by david i
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While David's correct that we have insufficient data to draw any conclusions, the Parker notice seems to conflict with the information told to Richard.

 

Len, I would suggest you do a request for information from the Defense Department. This info should be available under the Freedom of Information Act. There shouldn't be anything secret about whether or not the military ordered pens during the war.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anything the Army issued would have been stock. No personalizations. It is very unlikely that the Army would have issued fountain pens to anyone, commissioned or not. Parker "51"s would have been a personal purchase by the individual, or a gift from someone. I can just about guarantee this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Army were issuing fountain pens, the supreme commanders of the European and Pacific Theaters would certainly have been at the top of the list.

 

Just for the sake of fun, I'm going to point out Patton's non-reg sidearm-- High Command might occasionally have some non-issue kit.

 

But I'm not suggesting that there were GI Vacumatics.

Ravensmarch Pens & Books
It's mainly pens, just now....

Oh, good heavens. He's got a blog now, too.

 

fpn_1465330536__hwabutton.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... the Parker notice seems to conflict with the information told to Richard.

No, it doesn't. Those pens, as I said, were going to rear-echelon PXes -- all over the world, but mostly destined for Zone Interior (official term for "stateside").

sig.jpg.2d63a57b2eed52a0310c0428310c3731.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for the sake of fun, I'm going to point out Patton's non-reg sidearm-- High Command might occasionally have some non-issue kit.

Patton was recognized as something of a loose cannon, but Ike put up with him for the same reason that Abe Lincoln refused to dismiss Grant: as Lincoln put it, "He fights."

sig.jpg.2d63a57b2eed52a0310c0428310c3731.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We lack, i believe, a significant enough sampling to draw any conclusions or even serious hypotheses as to the purchasing habits of military pen buyers regarding color/brand/model/make.

 

Yes, I agree. I saw two vacs, out of the millions (?) produced, that are similar enough that I thought there might be a connection because of the style and engraving and was asking whether anyone else has seen others with the same features. I am trying to make N larger, but I don't expect to get a significant p value. It's not a study, just anecdotal.

 

Len

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We lack, i believe, a significant enough sampling to draw any conclusions or even serious hypotheses as to the purchasing habits of military pen buyers regarding color/brand/model/make.

 

Yes, I agree. I saw two vacs, out of the millions (?) produced, that are similar enough that I thought there might be a connection because of the style and engraving and was asking whether anyone else has seen others with the same features. I am trying to make N larger, but I don't expect to get a significant p value. It's not a study, just anecdotal.

 

Len

 

As to the similarity of the engraving...

Parker sold/rented/gave???? an engraving machine to their dealers so that they could properly engrave the users name on a pen...

This machine, AFAIK, was the same for all dealers.... during the celluloid period of the Vacumatic, etal I believe the machines used a heat impression system

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33559
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26744
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...