Jump to content

New Esterbrook J Pen


bfg

Recommended Posts

Finally, the new Esterbrook J pen appears at Fahrney's http://www.fahrneyspens.com/Item--i-30672S. Has anyone seen one in real life? From the Fahrney's add I am disappointed but not surprised. This seems like just another acrylic cc pen with a German nib. Then they have a special one with a sterling cap and grip http://www.fahrneyspens.com/Item--i-30671S?src=WFED0115SENTTOEL&utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Inhouse&utm_campaign=150122 Looks nice but $350 with a German steel nib?

 

An Esterbrook without interchangeable nibs is, in my opinion, no Esterbrook at all. It's sad to see great pen names like Esterbrook, Chilton and Mabie Todd return as likely Chinese-made mediocrities. Maybe the new maker will improve but it seems they don't really understand what Esterbrook was and, so far, I see no reason to buy one.

post-91159-0-70137300-1421957160.jpg

post-91159-0-32289800-1421957194.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Ernst Bitterman

    1

  • inkstainedruth

    1

  • bfg

    1

  • benbot517

    1

Yeah, terrible idea to launch with these vomit-inducing pens. I'm not unrealistic enough to expect interchangeable nibs from a recently launched pen company, but they could at least have at least started off on the right cosmetic foot and heritage nod with at least a design actually related in some way to the Esterbrook classics.

 

Hope they'll correct this mistake and come out with better pens (and send these current offerings to the incinerator.)

Edited by spaceink
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ARRRRgh! :crybaby: Can one hear the anguished cries of 4 Richards, Ed Wood and Syd Longmaid (perhaps even D.J.)?

Best Regards
Paul


“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
– Albert Einstein

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

An Esterbrook without interchangeable nibs is, in my opinion, no Esterbrook at all. It's sad to see great pen names like Esterbrook, Chilton and Mabie Todd return as likely Chinese-made mediocrities. Maybe the new maker will improve but it seems they don't really understand what Esterbrook was and, so far, I see no reason to buy one.

 

Not only no interchangeable nibs, but only one nib, period! Seriously??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This didn't bother me until I saw they actually call one model the Esterbrook J series! Why bother when it looks nothing like the J pens?

 

The new Deluxe is also nothing like the original Deluxe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well looking at the price and based on the pictures, this should be a self-limiting problem. I would expect (and hope) they will not be in business long. It's too bad Levenger didn't buy the rights to the name, they certainly would have treated it with more respect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This didn't bother me until I saw they actually call one model the Esterbrook J series! Why bother when it looks nothing like the J pens?

+1 on that. Nah, make that +1000.

The thread discussing the new Esties (most of the posts along the line of "What were they thinking?") is up to 14 pages at last count.

This. This is why I've mostly gone the vintage route the last couple of years. I'm guessing that the new owners were looking at what Parker did with the reissued Duofolds (which at least have the grace to LOOK like Duofolds) and -- more recently -- the IM Vacumatics. Which of course don't look *anything* like Vacs, and certainly won't have the Vac fill system, but at least are (somewhat) attractive -- I've considered getting one, except for the bad taste modern Parkers have left in my mouth over the issues I've had with Urbans.

But these. No way in hell am I spending money on one of the "new" Esterbrooks. Not when I can find vintage J pens easily enough. With interchangeable nibs, no less -- I've built up a nice set of 9xxx nibs at this point, in particular -- and for a lot less cash than even the low end new Esties are listed for. Yes, a few of the really exotic nibs have eluded me so far (not paying more for a 9284 nib than I paid for a Plum Parker 51, thanks lots...) but I've done pretty well overall. And the vintage Js -- the mackerels -- just are, well, pretty. You can't say that about the "new" ones. Some of those blanks look just like the acrylic Konrad colors. And I'll take an acrylic Konrad over a new Estie any day of the week -- and for less money.

Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth

"It's very nice, but frankly, when I signed that list for a P-51, what I had in mind was a fountain pen."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading this and the other thread on the topic, and what I keep getting is the sense that one is spending a lot of money to get a "New N Improved!" item that looks only vaguely like that which it has the name of. Given modern society's failings, this shouldn't surprise. For example, after spending a lot of money for "New N Improved"....

 

fpn_1422373906__prettierer.jpg

Edited by Ernst Bitterman

Ravensmarch Pens & Books
It's mainly pens, just now....

Oh, good heavens. He's got a blog now, too.

 

fpn_1465330536__hwabutton.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33563
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26748
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...