Jump to content

Help For This Onoto Pen


migbotero

Recommended Posts

I've got this Onoto pen and not sure about barrel material and approximate year of production.

I'm sure it is not a Minor, neither Magna, Mammoth, 2000, 3000, N, O, K models....but not sure if I can designate it as the "standard" model.

It is black chased but not sure if hard rubber or celluloid (no typical smell is recognized).

It is plunger filler, and measures approx. 139-140mm capped, 134mm uncapped and 180mm posted, with 16-17 grams of weight.

Although at the end there is a number 4601, I think it seems more similar to the 5600/6230 series (maybe this part was changed and is not from the original pen). Nib is 3/st (stub?).

I think it is from 30's to 50's but need to be more precise.

Could you please help me with your knowledge?

post-112662-0-72645800-1418566614_thumb.jpg

post-112662-0-12922600-1418566632_thumb.jpg

post-112662-0-00047500-1418566652_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • richardandtracy

    5

  • Cob

    5

  • migbotero

    4

  • PeterBeoworld

    1

It has the same nib as my 5601s and a similar shape. The clip is the same as my 6234. The Onoto numbering system seems to follow little in the way of order! We keenly await Steve Hulls definitive volume which may clear things up!

Very nice pen though. I may be wrong but I think yours will certainly be post 1930 and the question is whether it is pre or post WWII. I would guess pre but am happy to be proved wrong!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a 6233 which has the 3/st nib and the long section and twin cap bands the same as yours. I assume that one of the four digits refers to the colour; mine is green marbled. I also have a rose marbled Onoto numbered 5601; this one has a shorter section but the nib ( a broad oblique) carries the same 3/st designation.

 

The 6233 photo includes an unusual Croxley.

 

Cob

 

post-117400-0-29385000-1418599343_thumb.jpgpost-117400-0-86916000-1418599318_thumb.jpg

 

 

fpn_1428963683__6s.jpg “The pen of the British Empire” fpn_1423349537__swan_sign_is.jpg


Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cap looks like an Onoto 6233 to me. The 4601 seems to have a single cap ring, and the cap has a taper in a similar manner to the 56xx series (see Cob's upper photo above, where the taper starts around an inch from the top of the cap). For a photo of a 4601, take a look here: http://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/lovely-onoto-4601-fountain-pen There are other pens that look the same with the 4601 number on the web. All the 4601's I've seen on the web seem to have a #2 nib and short section too. So, I think it's a 6233.

 

As I understand it, most of the 623x's pre WW2 had ink view windows in the barrel. This was dispensed with post war, so I'd guess the pen is 1947 (when I think production got under way with a vengeance) to 1953 when I think the model was discontinued (or was it 1956?). HOWEVER, I don't think you'll get a definitive answer until Steve Hull's long awaited book is published.

 

Regards,

 

Richard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must be losing my marbles: I just checked, and the sections on the 6233 and 5601 are identical; the only difference is in the height of the clip screw and of course the clip and the cap bands !

 

Cob

fpn_1428963683__6s.jpg “The pen of the British Empire” fpn_1423349537__swan_sign_is.jpg


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all of you, I agree with Richard about 6233, all of these I've found are exactly as mine:

-same clip design

-same nib 3/st

-same number of cap bands (2)

-same feed section length

-same capped length? (138-140mm) - but not sure

 

But 5601's identified have different clip design (small ball ended), one cap band, shorter feed section, and I think also a shorter capped length (134mm??).

So, I think that the end screw (with 4601 number) of my pen must be from another pen.

 

Do you think this pen (mine) is hard rubber or celluloid?

For date of production, I guess we need to wait for the new Stephen book to come, unless we could get brochures from 30's or 40's for these Onotos.

Your help is very appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The plunger end will be hard rubber, as will the cap finial.

To decide on the body of the pen, you can rub it with your finger until it gets warm. If it smells like a car tyre when warm, it's rubber. If not, celluloid. I think it'll be celluloid.

The section will be celluloid.

 

I reviewed my 6233 here: https://www.fountainpennetwork.com/forum/index.php?/topic/173388-onoto-6233-blue-pearl-review/ Gives weights & dimensions for a direct comparison.

 

Regards,

 

Richard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, once rubbed I can get the "car tyre" smell. So, this is hard rubber, BCHR. There is not any ink window in the barrel (something introduced by 1937 in Onoto celluloid colored pens).

So, I don't think it is from 1950s, I suspect it was manufactured on 1930s (maybe contemporary to the first Magnas produced by 1937). And other option could be that many pens produced before WWII were stored and then re-introduced from 1946 to 1950?.

In this case I would consider that these pens are really from 1930s, although marketed in 1940s.

This is a very interesting exercise, and to be continued....

Another quest for my pen is to service the plunger mechanism and seals. I contacted with Peter Twydle from "The Pen Museum", and probably I will send him my pen after Christmas.

Do you have previous experience with this or other Onoto repairers?

Edited by migbotero
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, once rubbed I can get the "car tyre" smell. So, this is hard rubber, BCHR. There is not any ink window in the barrel (something introduced by 1937 in Onoto celluloid colored pens).

So, I don't think it is from 1950s, I suspect it was manufactured on 1930s (maybe contemporary to the first Magnas produced by 1937). And other option could be that many pens produced before WWII were stored and then re-introduced from 1946 to 1950?.

In this case I would consider that these pens are really from 1930s, although marketed in 1940s.

This is a very interesting exercise, and to be continued....

Another quest for my pen is to service the plunger mechanism and seals. I contacted with Peter Twydle from "The Pen Museum", and probably I will send him my pen after Christmas.

Do you have previous experience with this or other Onoto repairers?

For Onoto repairs, I can recommend Peter Crook at Carneil Pens; he has done three of my Onotos and I have just sent him another, a very old one with over/under feed he will do the seals and is also going to make a new cap for it.

 

Cob

Edited by Cob

fpn_1428963683__6s.jpg “The pen of the British Empire” fpn_1423349537__swan_sign_is.jpg


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to mention Eckiethump ( http://eckiethump.webs.com/ ) who restored my grandmother's gold sheathed 1924 hallmarked Onoto 3000. You can see the 'before' pic here: https://www.fountainpennetwork.com/forum/index.php/topic/40712-request-for-info-on-onoto-pen/ and the after in the first picture here: https://www.fountainpennetwork.com/forum/index.php?/topic/240495-onoto-magna-classic-review-blue-gold-chased/

 

 

Regards,

 

Richard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you very much, Peter, Cob... and Richard (very good reviews of your pens).

Your help is highly appreciated.

 

I will consider your restorer's recommendation, as I want to see this pen in good working order (I dipped the nib just to know the line variation, hardness or flex of the nib).

It's a very nice piece from this historical brand, and I'll try to look for some other "sister" to adopt (Magna and maybe one older 3000, who knows...).

 

Regards,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have learned a lot here, especially from Richard's review which is a great piece of work. I was fortunate the other day to get a cheap 3000 (with the over/under feed) and also for the same very small price, a 2000 to keep my working 2000 company.

 

They can be found occasionally! The working 2000 has a nib which is really quite unexceptional really - obviously good, but a bit ordinary I should say and a bit on the firm side for my taste (it is not a stub which is a different matter of course). On the other hand, the 3000's nib is gorgeous and I am really looking forward to getting it back.

 

Cob

fpn_1428963683__6s.jpg “The pen of the British Empire” fpn_1423349537__swan_sign_is.jpg


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been looking for an under/over feed 3000 at a reasonable price for ages (by this I mean approx. £10-£15), but haven't been that lucky yet.

 

Regards,

 

Richard.

Well I paid £19 (broken cap) and I think I did very well indeed!

 

Cob

fpn_1428963683__6s.jpg “The pen of the British Empire” fpn_1423349537__swan_sign_is.jpg


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comparing my BCHR Onotos 5601 and 6233 clearly shows the tapered/finishing end of the section to be quite shorter, hence sharper, on the latter pen.

Plus there is a clearly marked subordinate numbering on the top end of the barrel of 8.7 after the 5601 and a 66. after the 6233.

All caps, rings, clips and nibs seem identical on both pens and the caps could be (possibly) interchanged, albeit a tad better fit on the original pen.

The 6233 also has a fill directional turn arrow on the knob.

Past dating search has, now arguably, given them both c.1948.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26772
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...