Jump to content

Another Snorkel - On Estimating The Time Of Last Repair


Watermonkey314

Recommended Posts

I'm travelling so I haven't been able to fiddle with my first, partly-repaired Snorkel. My second Snorkel did arrive just before I left, and I've got it with me now. It appears to be a first-year Sentinel (white dot, 14k Triumph nib, SS cap w GF furniture) in surprisingly good repair. I'm quite happy with having paid $24 shipped for it!

 

I'm making the guess at it being a first-year pen based off the sac protector and Richard Binder's page on Snorkel repair - it has the "first-year" type of protector with one larger guide rail and no crimping to the plug. Given that, it's about 62 years old. I was fully expecting the rubber to be ossified, but I was shocked to find that's not the case. The point holder gasket was nice and pliable when I pulled it out; as I insert the sac protector+snorkel, I feel a similar amount of resistance as I did with my partly-repaired Snorkel. Likewise, the rear O-ring also seems ok, as it seems to produce a comparable amount of suction as my other Snorkel. Finally, the sac itself seems pliable, and some (extremely cautious) testing with water showed the entire fill system appears to be at least somewhat functional. (Another point of note - the section threads were not sealed, so I believe this implies that someone has been inside the pen.)

 

Now, I'm well aware of the danger of an unrecognized sac failure in a Snorkel, but I strongly believe that this pen has been serviced. I just don't know how long ago it was; the seller didn't know it was even a Snorkel and mentioned that he'd found it inside his grandmother's desk. Would you recommend resaccing it anyways? Would semi-regular checks inside the barrel be sufficient to monitor the health of the sac?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • GG917

    1

  • Tylerjordan

    1

  • Watermonkey314

    1

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Always resac pens that haven't be explicitly restored. It will save you trouble down the road!

 

I would replace both seals, too. Even if they seem good now there is no guessing how old they are or when they'll fail.

Edited by Tylerjordan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seen snorkel with worn o-ring still doing a little "pfff" when working the filling mechanism. But you'd better change them to make sure the pen is filling completely. The minimum for a snorkel restauration is to change the sac and two seals (front and back).

 

Changing a sac in a snorkel without taking care of the seals is like resacing a lever filler but not de-rusting the pressure bar.

 

Some unrepaired snorkel can open witouht having to apply heat, the adhesive can simply give up. It's aroud 60 year old!

Edited by GG917
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33582
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26771
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...