Jump to content

Can Someone Identify This Waterman Pen?


Zorthianator

Recommended Posts

I bought this pen a while ago and I can't find the exact model. It has a set that includes ink and an addon for the pen that provides a different type of nib.

 

Is this worth anything in particular? Anyway I could trade it for something else?

 

Thank you!

post-115627-0-31777700-1408129521_thumb.jpg

post-115627-0-40785600-1408129531_thumb.jpg

post-115627-0-24079100-1408129834_thumb.jpg

post-115627-0-70801800-1408129840_thumb.jpg

Edited by Zorthianator
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Zorthianator

    5

  • Left FPN

    3

  • RMN

    2

  • Uncle Red

    2

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Pictures of the section and nib would be a big help. Looks like a nice pen, how does it write?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pictures of the section and nib would be a big help. Looks like a nice pen, how does it write?

Added more pictures! Hope it helps.

 

It writes very smoothly, I doubt it was ever used before since it was completely dry and the suctions thing inside the pen was completely transparent before I filled it up to see if it would work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a pen I do not recognise. It is not on the captainchang site.

But last week there was a pen with similar nib called a jif-matic. This had a squeeze converter.

See here: https://www.fountainpennetwork.com/forum/index.php/topic/270122-does-anybody-know-this-watermans-jif-matic-fountain-pen/

 

I wonder about the 88 on the cartridge pack. Last week there was another topic where boxes with that number and with 23 were shown, apparently older types of Waterman cartridges?

 

I would think this pen to be 60s or thereabouts, an answer of Waterman to the P51 and P61.

 

 

 

Edit. Could be an X-pen. This has a capillary filler. You put it in the ink for a while and it sucks in the ink, like with the P61.

 

 

D.ick

~

KEEP SAFE, WEAR A MASK, KEEP A DISTANCE.

Freedom exists by virtue of self limitation.

~

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a pen I do not recognise. It is not on the captainchang site.

But last week there was a pen with similar nib called a jif-matic. This had a squeeze converter.

See here: https://www.fountainpennetwork.com/forum/index.php/topic/270122-does-anybody-know-this-watermans-jif-matic-fountain-pen/

 

I wonder about the 88 on the cartridge pack. Last week there was another topic where boxes with that number and with 23 were shown, apparently older types of Waterman cartridges?

 

I would think this pen to be 60s or thereabouts, an answer of Waterman to the P51 and P61.

 

 

 

Edit. Could be an X-pen. This has a capillary filler. You put it in the ink for a while and it sucks in the ink, like with the P61.

 

 

D.ick

Thank you for the help!

 

Are these collectible? I've been thinking about trading it for something else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know very little about prices.

 

IF it is indeed the X-pen, it would be interesting for the real collectors. These capillary systems are not easy to use, so people would not bother, I guess. I hope one of the other real collectors chimes in.....

 

 

D.ick

~

KEEP SAFE, WEAR A MASK, KEEP A DISTANCE.

Freedom exists by virtue of self limitation.

~

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does the pen have Waterman stamped/etched/engraved on it. While it is boxed with a bottle of Waterman ink it may not be what it seems.

 

If it does not I am sticking my neck out and saying it's not a Waterman pen set.

 

Is the name on the barrel engraved into the plastic. I assume it was a giveaway from the steel supplier to it's best customers. They are still in business so maybe someone there might know some history. Email them a picture.

 

As for value, again one of the Directors of Pfenninger Stahl AG might like it on their desk.

 

PS, we never did receive an answer on the 88 reference though having done a little searching I found this. It appears 1987 was an important period for the Gillette/Waterman company and 1988 was the first accounting period for Waterman pens under the Gillette company. Just maybe this was acknowledged with 88 on the ink packaging. I will make this a new topic for others to read. And further reading, if the pen is not endorsed Waterman could it be a Parker pen.

Edited by Force
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does the pen have Waterman stamped/etched/engraved on it. While it is boxed with a bottle of Waterman ink it may not be what it seems.

 

If it does not I am sticking my neck out and saying it's not a Waterman pen set.

 

Is the name on the barrel engraved into the plastic. I assume it was a giveaway from the steel supplier to it's best customers. They are still in business so maybe someone there might know some history. Email them a picture.

 

As for value, again one of the Directors of Pfenninger Stahl AG might like it on their desk.

 

PS, we never did receive an answer on the 88 reference though having done a little searching I found this. It appears 1987 was an important period for the Gillette/Waterman company and 1988 was the first accounting period for Waterman pens under the Gillette company. Just maybe this was acknowledged with 88 on the ink packaging. I will make this a new topic for others to read. And further reading, if the pen is not endorsed Waterman could it be a Parker pen.

 

 

It's engraved on the cap saying "Waterman", so I guess it's really a Waterman set.

 

I will try to contact this company and see what I can find out about this pen.

 

Thanks!

 

Edit: I found this PDF document about some teachers magazine during the 1960s and found out that they used to advertise this pen to teachers in Switzerland. So I assume that the "88" has nothing to do with 1988.

 

Supposedly it's the WAT pen made by Waterman and used to cost 12.50 Swiss Francs, sold by Jif AG in Zürich.

Edited by Zorthianator
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26772
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...