Jump to content

Waterman Eye Dropper With A Mabie Todd Nib


revdem

Recommended Posts

I recently picked up a Waterman #16 eye dropper at an antique store. It has a fair biit of wear on the imprint, is a dark brown color, but has no chips or cracks. It has a waterman clip, but an interesting nib. Instead of the expected #6 Waterman nib it has a 55, stub nib made by Mabie Todd. It has a three line Longitudinal imprint reading Mabie Todd & Co/Legal nib/New York, and a crescent shaped breather hole. I know some of the early Waterman ads said that you could buy a pen holder and have your own nib installed - could this be a possible explanation for what's gone on here? Paid the princely sum of $3.00 for this pen and wanted to satisfy my curiosity as to how it ended up the way it did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vintagepens

    3

  • revdem

    3

  • Dlpens

    2

  • Scrawler

    2

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Great nib!

Waterman stopped advertising the fitting of non-Waterman nibs back in the early 1890s, if my memory is correct (I don't have my notes on this handy at the moment). Your pen would have been made no earlier than 1910, assuming the clip is original, so one can assume that the nib's installation was not "official".

I've run across other pens with non-Waterman nibs that by all indications had been in the pens for a very long time, but likely as not they were installed way back when by pen mechanics more concerned with pleasing a customer than the strictures of the Waterman company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That Mabie Todd nib might be pretty scarce. Congratulations!

 

I also find now and then pens with wrong nibs and I always assumed that the original nib was broken and somebody put a substitution nib that was available or favorite by the owner of the pen.

" I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." -- Albert Einstein

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great nib!

Waterman stopped advertising the fitting of non-Waterman nibs back in the early 1890s, if my memory is correct (I don't have my notes on this handy at the moment). Your pen would have been made no earlier than 1910, assuming the clip is original, so one can assume that the nib's installation was not "official".

I've run across other pens with non-Waterman nibs that by all indications had been in the pens for a very long time, but likely as not they were installed way back when by pen mechanics more concerned with pleasing a customer than the strictures of the Waterman company.

There was some wag, who was an expert riveter who cut up accommodation clips and riveted them to caps of early pens, after it became fashionable to make pens with pocket clips. I have an example of a Swan Mabie Todd with a very similar nib. It is a bit later than this one. I estimate around 1917. That has had an accommodation clip cut up like this and riveted on in a similar way. It is quite possible that the riveting may have been done as late as the mid 1920s. In the case of this pen, it is very likely that both the body and nib were made before 1910, which is the patent date of the clip that was used on this pen, it is also quite likely that work was done much later.

 

The earliest Clip-Cap I have seen was from 1906, shortly after, I think in 1908, Waterman started to put lever fillers in. I am not sure, but I think that by 1910 they were probably mostly lever fillers. So My guess is that the Clip-Cap was taken from a post 1910 pen and then riveted on to an earlier pen.

Edited by Scrawler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waterman only introduced its first lever-fillers in 1915. Waterman's slip-cap eyedroppers remained popular for some time after the introduction of the lever-filler, too.

 

The pen (nib excepted) appears entirely consistent with standard Waterman manufacture c. 1910-1915. I see no reason whatsoever to posit that the clip was installed later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recently acquired a Waterman 52 1/2 BHR lever-filler with a nib that has a single "W" on it. I thought at first it was a Waterman nib, but after some checking on the web I'm fairly sure it's a Paul Wirt nib. Nice and flexible too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waterman only introduced its first lever-fillers in 1915. Waterman's slip-cap eyedroppers remained popular for some time after the introduction of the lever-filler, too.

 

The pen (nib excepted) appears entirely consistent with standard Waterman manufacture c. 1910-1915. I see no reason whatsoever to posit that the clip was installed later.

Yes you are right, my brain was not in gear, I was thinking of Sheaffer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We often find earlier pens with later nibs. For that reason alone you cannot date a pen by the nib. In many instances the owner did drop a pen on its nib and brought the pen in for a repair. Either the owner or the repairman could have made the decision to use that nib, which is very nice. One of my joys at flea markets etc. is taking off the caps of otherwise boring pens and finding wonderful replacement nibs, like Waterman 100 nibs and occasionally earlier nibs or a music nib. This Mabie Todd nib looks to me to be a nib made in the teens by MT. Nice pen!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really wasn't that unusual for customers to ask a repairman to install a special nib, and most would happily comply. I recall buying a group of three or four pens from a man's estate -- a Wahl, a Conklin, and (I think) a Moore, all late 1920s to mid-1930s in date -- all of which were fitted with needlepoint warranted nibs. Clearly, the fellow liked super-fine nibs, and didn't care what brand name was on them.

 

I must differ from my friend Don on the dating of the Mabie Todd nib, though: to my eye, it's earlier than the pen, not later -- maybe 1890s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I believe that David is correct. I forgot about the crescent breather hole. Nib is probably earlier than the pen itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I dare to bring that topic up because I have recently bought a pen with a similar nib. I've asked for information in this spanish forum and some others similar nibs appeared. People thinks that there's a relation between them and some legal documents mainly in England. As it would be the case of John Whytwarth, Conway Stewart, Mentmore, etc. It is also supposed that those short tines perhaps were used to make copies with carbon papers. But nothing definitive.

Any theory of what would the "Legal Pen" or the number 33 mean? or if is there a practical reason for those crescent breathing holes and short tines?

 

http://s23.postimg.org/rp89byna3/w_IMG_3980.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Accountant/accounting nibs maybe.

 

Here

Thank you Force, that is a possibility. I thought that accountant nibs were always fine pointed, but maybe not. Interesting link, I'll ask Álvaro from Goldnibs about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

The "Legal Pens" were Mabie Todd's stub dip nibs. Here are a 44 and a 55 in reversible holders:

 

http://i.imgur.com/RZNKZsV.jpg

 

They do work as excellent FP nibs as well, though. The crescent shaped hole gives them a little flex. I'm currently using the 44 in a Desiderata:

 

http://i.imgur.com/Q4vE7lA.jpg

 

Here's the range of MT Legal Pens (from a 1903 catalogue):

 

http://i.imgur.com/n0EsNgI.jpg

 

More info in this thread: https://www.fountainpennetwork.com/forum/topic/295948-mabie-todd-dip-pens/page-2

 

http://i.imgur.com/utQ9Ep9.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've run across Moores with Waterman nibs on one or two occasions, and I found an incredibly flexy nib on a Remington, of all things. I asked Art Van Haselin to transplant it back into a Waterman body, which I have hopes he can accomplish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33583
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26772
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...