Jump to content

19, Pens & Nibs,


rhr

Recommended Posts

Trademark no. 16012, Consolidated Agency Co., "Pens, Inks, And Nibs", Nov 20, 1888, used since Nov 13, 1884, is for the word "Fountograph", an early use of the word "nibs" for "pens", or the whole pen point, but by a company from the UK, the first appearance of the word "nibs" in a title in the US trademarks. Also see US patent no. 5,789 for an earlier use of the word "nib" in the patents, but then it doesn't get used again for decades. Trademark no. 34061, Perry & Co., "Pen-Nibs", Jan 23, 1900, used since May 1866, is for the words "Albert Pen" and a portrait of the late Prince Consort, another early use of the word "nibs" in the US trademarks. The redundancy of the hyphenated title is another sign that the confusion between these two words is about to be resolved, belatedly, in the US, and that the word "nib" will imminently displace the word "pen" as the word of choice. Still, it takes a British penmaking company to use the word. Trademark no. 34209, Perry & Co., "Pens", Feb 20, 1900, used since 1868, is for the words "Abraham Lincoln" and a portrait of the late president. In a step backwards, it seems like the USPTO re-asserted its hegemony and dictated what it viewed as the correct form of this title by forcing the use of the word "pens" instead of the word "nibs". Trademark no. 79883, Johan A. Alling, "Pens And Nibs", Oct 18, 1910, used since Aug 1, 1909, no trademark image on the USPTO website, another late appearance of the word "nibs" in the Trademark system, but not in the Patents or the Designs. It seems almost as if the Patent-Design division and the Trademark division of the USPTO weren't talking to one another. ;~)

 

George Kovalenko.

 

:ninja:

 

If you want to perform the trademark searches, simply cut and paste, or type the trademark numbers into the search window in the Trademark Document Retrieval Portlet.

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • rhr

    2

  • Dave Johannsen

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Resume Writing Services

Round nibs allows fast writing but will only produce lines of uniform thickness.Italics produce crisp writing and great line variation but will be slower to write.Many people believe that the happy medium lies in the cursive italic nib.

 

Resume Writing Services

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, "fountain pen" (to denote a pen that held its own ink) seems to have settled into consistent and unambiguous use more than two decades earlier than the resolution of nib vs. pen (IIRC, "fountain pen" was pretty well established by the 1880s)? I would have guessed that nib/pen/holder/fountain pen usage would have all shaken out more or less simultaneously. Thanks for the interesting post.

 

 

dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Round nibs allow fast writing but will only produce lines of uniform thickness. Italics produce crisp writing and great line variation but will be slower to write. Many people believe that the happy medium lies in the cursive italic nib.

I don't know about that. I use italic nibs exclusively, and I write like the wind. You get used to the sharp edge and the corners. The problem is that most people try to use pressure with their italic nibs to get line variation, even though it isn't required with italics, and then they complain about the nib ripping the paper. Well, they are the ones at fault, not the nib. An italic nib requires a very light touch, and in spite of that, you still get line variation. You have to learn to let the nib glide over the paper at just the right level of pressure.

 

Practically all the writing in the western world between the 7th and 19th centuries was accomplished with sharp, chisel-cut quills, and they wrote quickly enough. The only constant complaint you read from that era is that they kept running out of the small quantity of ink held by a single dip of a quill, and that they had to keep redipping into an inkwell right in the middle of an interrupted thought. What they wanted was a pen with its own supply of ink, not a pen with a different nib. I shouldn't make too much of that, though, because quills are by their own nature flexible, so that flexiness is responsible for a lot of the italic character of the writing from that era. But with metal nibs, you need next to no pressure at all. There's the familiar Duofold ad from the 1920s touting that the pen would write under its own weight, simply resting on the web of skin between the thumb and index finger and dragged along on the paper. The thumb and finger tips are required only for control, not pressure, or minimal pressure at best.

 

Before I typed this post into the message board, I wrote the whole thing with an italic nib. ;~)

 

So, "fountain pen" (to denote a pen that held its own ink) seems to have settled into consistent and unambiguous use more than two decades earlier than the resolution of nib vs. pen (IIRC, "fountain pen" was pretty well established by the 1880s)? I would have guessed that nib/pen/holder/fountain pen usage would have all shaken out more or less simultaneously. Thanks for the interesting post.

It's hard to establish exact dates. All we have to go by is the printed and published and manuscript evidence. I am simply making my deductions from the limited evidence of the US patent, design, and trademark specifications, but a more firm chronology would have to look more closely at the British patents, and advertisements, and diaries, and correspondence, as well as the world literature in other languages. But you're right, the patent literature is a fascinating read, if you can get past some of its dry aspects. Mind you, you'll have to read all of them. ;~)

 

George Kovalenko.

 

:ninja:

Edited by rhr

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33501
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26627
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...